dfgraphics
Latest Bin Laden Video phoney. 7 of 19 found alive!
Fri Sep 13 08:07:53 2002
68.98.68.169

Latest Bin Laden Video phoney. 7 of 19 found alive!
9/12/02
dfgraphics@gci-net.com

7 of the 19 hijackers "identified" by the FBI, were found alive
AFTER 9/11. (See following URLs at bottom about the 7 wrongly
identified men, located by British reporters and others, last year.)

But Bush, our FBI and major news media, CONTINUE TO IGNORE that
7 (unknown) IMPOSTORS used their identities!
-------------------------
Because of the preceding fact, the latest Bin laden
video "confession" must be a phoney! Video statements that ALL 19 of
the FBI IDENTIFIED hijackers KNEW - in advance - they were going to
die on suicide flights, is an obvious lie!
-------------------------
Therefore, the possibility this convenient new video "evidence"
may have been produced - or "doctored" - by somebody in our
government OR by "another" nation's Intelligence Service (Israel's
Mossad?), should be investigated by Congress!

(Qatar's Al-Jazeera TV which presented the new video, has an
unpublicised association with Israel. According to a recent Mid East
Realities email, the station ignored reporting last month a "secret"
meeting between Qatar's foreign minister and his Israeli counterpart,
Shimon Peres.)
http://www.middleeast.org/launch/
-------------------------
THE RATIONALE AND EXCUSE for our "War on Terrorism," starting
against Afghanistan's Taliban, now stretched to Iraq, rests upon
Bush's claimed FOUNDATION BELIEF that 19 specifically "identified"
MUSLIM extremists, directed by Bin Laden, hijacked the four 9/11
planes and crashed them on intended suicide "terror" missions. If
that belief is in error, the "foundation" falls apart.
-------------------------
President Bush, our government AND major American news media had
been alerted by British media since last September that
Bush's "foundation belief" was in error, at least concerning the 7
falsely identified as hijackers by our FBI. Yet Bush and the media
continue to ignore this astounding revelation, repeatedly showing the
SAME 19 photos and names! Why?
-------------------------
The preceding logically leads to asking these QUESTIONS:

* Were MORE of the 19 hijackers ALSO impostors?

* Is it possible the REAL directing "terrorists" who planned the
attacks and controlled the planes (while keeping Andrews Air Force
Base's TWO always ready interceptor squadrons, grounded) have escaped
discovery?

* Is it possible that 9/11 was actually TREASON inside America
to falsely enrage the American people against the entire Islamic
world in an invented "War on Terrorism?" Daily becoming more a "War
on Islam?"

* Is it therefore also possible that some of the 19 assumed
hijackers (if they were even on the planes) may have been
unknowing "patsies?"
----------------------
Telegraph UK Sept 23, 2001 "REVEALED: THE MEN WITH STOLEN
IDENTITIES."
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml
-----------------------------------
Independent UK Sept 17, 2001 'SUICIDE HIJACKER' IS AN AIRLINE
PILOT ALIVE AND WELL IN JEDDAH."
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=94438
-----------------------------------
BBC News Sept. 23, 2001 "HIJACK 'SUSPECTS' ALIVE AND WELL"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_1559000/1559151.stm
----------------------------------
"7 OF THE 19 BELIEVED HIJACKERS NAMED ARE STILL ALIVE."
http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/wtc/wtc-hijackers.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Al Qaeda" in Arabic translates to "the base."
From The Christian Science Monitor 9-5-2
DEBUNKING THE MYTH OF AL QAEDA
Its Size And Reach Have Been Blown Out Of Proportion
http://www.rense.com/general28/myth.htm
Excerpt: The US must be careful about its use of the term "Al
Qaeda." Meaning "the base" in Arabic, it originally referred to an
Afghan operational base for the mujahideen during the Soviet
occupation in the '80s.
------------------------------
Proof Israel/Richard Perle dictating War on Iraq?
9/12/02
dfgraphics@gci-net.com

Robalini... 2nd of 2 emails I'm sending to many in Congress and the
media...
--------------------
BEFORE carpet bombing begins and tens of thousands of Iraqi
civilians become "collateral damage" dead, we should first consider
the following:
----------------------
IS THERE PROOF America's proposed WAR AGAINST IRAQ is being
dictated by the ISRAELI government in collusion with Defense Policy
Board head Richard Perle and his band of ISRAEL-FIRST advisors
surrounding President Bush?
---------------------
YES, according to Lyndon LaRouche who says he has PROOF and
presents it in a PRESS RELEASE (see bottom)contending that Richard
Perle and an Israeli Spy Ring network of "Pollard stay-behinds"
inside the Bush Administration are behind the "urgent" drive to
induce Bush and Congress to go to war against Iraq!

http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/090802pollard_affr.html
---------------------
According to LaRouche, the collusion was originally planned back
in 1996, with Richard Perle proposing to then Prime Minister
Netanyahu a NEW ISRAELI POLICY:

* repudiating the Oslo Accords
* a PERMANENT Israeli occupation of the entire West Bank and Gaza
* elimination of Saddam Hussein
* to be followed by overthrowing or destabilizing the governments of
Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Iran

The document, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the
Realm," (FOR Israel) was prepared for the Jerusalem and Washington,
D.C.-based Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies
(IASPS), one so-called "independent" organization now being quoted in
the media giving "reasons" to attack Iraq. Perle and his "Israel-
First" crowd are OBSESSED with pressuring Bush and Congress to adopt
and carry out their Israel-Likud "Clean Break" policy.
----------------------
(Excerpt from LaRouche Press Release): "Perle most recently
staged the July 10, 2002 Defense Policy Board session, which demanded
the purging of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of all opponents of the Iraq
war, and called for a U.S. military occupation and takeover of the
Saudi oil fields and a total break with the House of Saud-just as his
July 1996 IASPS "Clean Break" study had proposed."
-----------------------
(Read the LaRouche EIR Press Release at bottom and judge for
yourself if there is sufficient proof for Congress to hold IMMEDIATE
PUBLIC HEARINGS to investigate LaRouche's serious charges about
CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR inside Bush's administration.)

http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/090802pollard_affr.html
-------------------------
(ADDITIONAL): In the UK Independent 10 Sept 2002, ROBERT FISK makes
similar accusations about ISRAELI LOBBYISTS, now dictating policy
inside the Bush administration, in the following scathing article...
BUSH IS INTENT ON PAINTING ALLIES AND ENEMIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST AS
EVIL:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=332011

(Excerpts): Only The Nation among all of America's newspapers
and magazines has dared to point out that a large number of former
Israeli lobbyists are now working within the American administration
and the Bush plans for the Middle East - which could cause a massive
political upheaval in the Arab world - fit perfectly into Israel's
own dreams for the region.

The magazine listed Vice-President Dick Cheney - the arch-hawk
in the US administration - and John Bolton, now under-secretary of
state for Arms Control, with Douglas Feith, the third most senior
executive at the Pentagon, as members of the advisory board of the
pro-Israeli Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa)
before joining the Bush government. Richard Perle, chairman of the
Pentagon's Defence Policy Board, is still an adviser on the
institute, as is the former CIA director James Woolsey. ...Mr Perle
advises the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld...

President Bush, of course, will not be talking about the
influence of these pro-Israeli lobbyists when he presents his vision
of the Middle East at the United Nations on Thursday.
-----------------------------
Note: The above JINSA organization was identified by LaRouche as
a lobby for the Israeli Army, the IDF (Israeli Defense Forces.) and
Ariel Sharon. The above (biased) officials, strongly dedicated to
promoting Israel (and its army), should not be tolerated inside our
government!
-----------------------------
Posted by Dick Fojut
Dick Fojut Graphics dfgraphics@gci-net.com
Tucson, AZ
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
PRESS RELEASE
from the website of Lyndon LaRouche's
EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
(Released by the LaRouche in 2004 committee on Sept. 8)
------------------
THE POLLARD AFFAIR NEVER ENDED!
http://www.larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2002/090802pollard_affr.html

Lyndon LaRouche reports that there is now firm evidence that the
ongoing drive to induce President George W. Bush to launch a war
against Iraq, is a 1996 Israeli government policy that is being
foisted on the President by a nest of Israeli agents inside the U.S.
government. This Israeli spy network inside the United States was
unable achieve their objective until President Bush was entrapped by
the events of Sept. 11, 2001 and the falsified accounts of those
events provided by this foreign intelligence apparatus, and lured
over to their policies. Lyndon LaRouche demands to know: Is this not
the motive that explains the who and why of the attacks of Sept. 11,
2001? LaRouche demands an immediate Congressional investigation, to
help purge the U.S. government of this foreign intelligence
apparatus, which attempted, with the 9/11 events, to seize control
over U.S. foreign policy. The network of Pollard "stay-behinds"
inside the Bush Administration is engaged in a witting hoax, to
induce the President and the U.S. Congress to go to war.

When you read the summary evidence below, you will certainly share
Lyndon LaRouche's conclusion that all of these people must be
immediately fired from their Administration posts, and that the U.S.
Congress must launch public hearings to get to the bottom of this
criminal scheme.

The summary facts are as follows:

On July 8, 1996, Richard Perle, now the Chairman of the Defense
Policy Board, an advisory group that reports to Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, presented a written document to Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, spelling out a new Israeli foreign
policy, calling for a repudiation of the Oslo Accords and the
underlying concept of "land for peace"; for the permanent annexation
of the entire West Bank and Gaza Strip; and for the elimination of
the Saddam Hussein regime in Baghdad, as a first step towards
overthrowing or destabilizing the governments of Syria, Lebanon,
Saudi Arabia, and Iran. The document was prepared for the Jerusalem
and Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Advanced Strategic and
Political Studies (IASPS), a think tank financed by Richard Mellon-
Scaife. The report, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the
Realm," was co-authored by Perle; Douglas Feith, currently the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy; David Wurmser, currently
special assistant to State Department chief arms control negotiator
John Bolton; and Meyrav Wurmser, now director of Mideast Policy at
the Hudson Institute.

Two days after he received the foreign policy blueprint from Perle,
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu delivered a speech before a joint
session of the U.S. Congress, which strongly echoed the IASPS
outline. The same day, the Wall Street Journal published excerpts
from the IASPS document, and the next day, July 11, 1996, the Journal
editorially endorsed the Perle document.

Beginning in February 1998, the British government of Prime Minister
Tony Blair launched a concerted effort, in league with the Netanyahu
government in Israel, and the Perle Israeli agent-of-influence
networks inside the United States, to induce President William
Clinton to launch a war against Iraq, under precisely the terms
spelled out for Netanyahu in the "Clean Break" paper. The war was to
be launched, ostensibly, over Iraq's possession of "weapons of mass
destruction." United Nations weapons inspectors were, at this time,
still on the ground inside Iraq.

To buttress the war drive, British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook
issued an official lying "white paper" on the Iraqi drive to obtain
WMD. On Feb. 19, 1998, Richard Perle and former Congressman Stephen
Solarz released an "Open Letter to the President," demanding a full-
scale U.S.-led drive for "regime change" in Baghdad. The dangerously
incompetent military scheme for the overthrow of Saddam that was
published in the Open Letter, has been recently revived by the Perle-
led network of "chickenhawks" in the office of Secretary of Defense-
but has been summarily rejected by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Among
the signators on the original Perle-Solarz letter were the following
current Bush Administration officials: Elliott Abrams (National
Security Council), Richard Armitage (State Department), John Bolton
(State Department), Doug Feith (Defense Department), Fred Ikle
(Defense Policy Board), Zalmay Khalilzad (White House), Peter Rodman
(Defense Department), Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of Defense), Paul
Wolfowitz (Defense Department), David Wurmser (State Department), and
Dov Zakheim (Defense Department).

President Clinton rejected the February 1998 demand for war, sending
both Netanyahu and Blair into fits of rage.

On Aug. 6, 1998, Angelo Codevilla, the Washington, D.C. co-director
of IASPS (along with David Wurmser), penned an op-ed in the Wall
Street Journal, demanding the freeing of convicted Israeli spy
Jonathan Pollard. Codevilla argued that Pollard had been right to
pass U.S. classified material to Israel, because of the threat posed
by Saddam Hussein. Days later, two members of the Netanyahu cabinet
contacted Vice President Al Gore, demanding Pollard's release.

After again rejecting the Netanyahu and Blair demands for war on Iraq
in November 1998, President Clinton-under the impeachment onslaught,
led by the Mellon-Scaife-funded apparatus-finally caved in and
authorized Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, as he was returning
on Air Force One from a visit to Israel. But the 70 days of
bombardment did not eliminate the Saddam Hussein regime, and the
issue remained dormant for the next three years ... until Sept. 11,
2001.

Within moments of the 9/11 attack on Washington and New York, the
same Pollard-linked American networks who had designed the Netanyahu
foreign policy were on the warpath, demanding that President Bush go
to war against Iraq, despite the fact that, to this day, there is no
plausible evidence linking Iraq to the September 2001 irregular
warfare attacks. The Sharon government in Israel instantly declared
that the attack had been ordered by Saddam Hussein, and called for
massive retaliation against Baghdad.

On Sept. 22, 2001, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz made a
feverish pitch for war on Iraq at a Camp David meeting with President
Bush and most of the Cabinet. Wolfowitz had been brought into the
inner circle of George W. Bush a year before the 2000 Presidential
elections, at the initiative of former Secretary of State George
Shultz. By 1999, Wolfowitz and Condi Rice had become co-responsible
for pulling together the Bush campaign foreign policy