James
Weapons of Mass Destruction; or, Words of Mass Deception
Fri Sep 13 13:49:33 2002
68.98.68.169

Weapons of Mass Destruction; or, Words of Mass Deception

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: The Demonization Industry of George Herbert Walker Bush
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:58:56 +0300
From: "James xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: apfn@apfn.org

Dear APFN,

This time, if you list this article, could my e-mail address be deleted,
and, could my byline be shown as ...

Efstratios, Greece


====================================================

THE DEMONIZATION INDUSTRY OF GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH


George Herbert Walker Bush, Bush the father, has always been proud of his
1600's ancestry from Massachusetts. Although Bush's ancestor may not have
actually come over on the "Mayflower" itself, perhaps, a few years later, it
may have been a boat named the "Junebug", or something similar. Because
George Herbert Walker Bush thereby almost always looks upon everyone else as
inferior, this may largely explain why he was able to so easily name three
purported demons as follows:

. Manuel Noriega - 1989
. Saddam Hussein - 1990
. Slobodan Milosevic - 1991

All three names suddenly became known to the general public, almost like a
sudden new advertising campaign for a new commercial product, suddenly
unveiled by the major networks. All three demons came into being during the
four year period that Bush the father was President of the United States.


Part I - Manuel Noriega


The trial of Manuel Noriega took place on or about 1990 in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case was assigned
to a Judge Hoeveler, who later initially heard the famous Elian case. It is
said that Judge Hoeveler did not allow the Noriega defense to present
important evidence linking Bush the father to Noriega. However, in 1988,
Newsweek magazine, while Katherine Graham was still alive, published an
important article linking the Chief of Staff to then Vice-President Bush the
father to activities of this sort in Central America.

Throughout American history, impeachments of U.S. District Judges have
always been extremely rare, except two or three times during the late
1980's, the Reagan-Bush period. Thus, a few months earlier, also in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, there was another
Judge, a Judge Hastings, who ruled that the defense in another case could
present evidence that would be relevant to the innocence of the defendant.
The same prosecutors as in the forthcoming Noriega case then brought
allegations of prior bribery or perjury against Judge Hastings. However,
the jury found Judge Hastings innocent.

A few months later, Judge Hoeveler then issued his restrictions on the
presentation of evidence by the Noriega defense. Just by coincidence, this
evidence also showed important links between Bush the father and goings on
in Central America. The question easily becomes, who was Noriega always
working for? When the defense is not allowed to present important,
mitigating evidence before the jury, this is something that truly results in
a mockery of the Sixth Amendment; but it seems that during the Reagan-Bush
period, it didn't matter.

What else did Manuel Noriega really do wrong? During the late 1970's,
President Jimmy Carter concluded a treaty with Panama such that, twenty
years later, American troops would be withdrawn from the Panama Canal Zone.
Twenty years later, Bill Clinton actually kept this promise, and he withdrew
the troops. However, a lesser known fact is that after the first ten years,
by the end of 1989, for the first time in history, Panama was to be allowed
to name the Managing Director of the Panama Canal Company. As the end of
1989 approached, Manuel Noriega thought that what was in writing in the
treaty was the truth. However, it must have been the case that Bush the
father felt that Mr. Noriega didn't have sufficient blue blood flowing
through his veins; and all the time, the public thought that it was the
prohibited substances issue that was relevant.


Part II - Saddam Hussein


The acronym, WMD, is known to stand for Weapons of Mass Destruction; or,
does it stand for Words of Mass Deception? If Saddam still has such
weapons, where did he get them from? Way back in 1978, Iraq reoriented
itself from East to West, and a number of formerly prominent communists in
Iraq were done away with (put to death). Then, a French company was allowed
to begin construction of a nuclear power plant near Baghdad. Of course,
Saddam was also helping the West with his war against Iran, thereby
punishing the Ayatollah for what he did to the American Embassy in Tehran in
1979.

Iraq is the only major holder of oil reserves that does not have access to
the sea. Apparently, Saddam was promised the city of Abadan on the Iranian
side of the Shatt al-Arab waterway, but it didn't work out. The Shatt
al-Arab waterway is the result of the biblical Euphrates and Tigris rivers
joining together, and then flowing into the Persian Gulf. Going back in
history, the British once grabbed the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab waterway
from the Ottoman Turks when oil in Mesopotamia was first discovered, and
then they called this area "Kuwait". Later, during the 1920's, according to
the Council of the League of Nations, the Mesopotamian Mandate did not
provide for the existence of Kuwait.

After Saddam's eight year war against Iran failed to provide Iraq with the
city of Abadan, it's almost as though Saddam then said to Ambassador April
Glaspie, "Ms. Glaspie, can I hava (sic) Kuwait? You know, Kuwait."

As things had been happening, in 1981, Israel surprised Washington by
bombing the French nuclear power plant under construction near Baghdad.
This happened on June 7, 1981. On June 16, 1981, Reagan, perhaps upon
suggestion by Vice-President Bush the father said, about this air raid,
"Well, I did make a statement in which I condemned that." So, at that time,
Bush the father stood behind his good boy, Saddam. Bush the father stood
behind his good boy, Saddam, nuclear reactor and all.


Part III - Slobodan Milosevic


In the Spring of 1941, Adolf Hitler told the Balkan countries that they
were going to have to sign up for his forthcoming war against Russia. Then,
Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria said yes. Only Yugoslavia and Greece said no.

Only Yugoslavia and Greece got bombed. In 1989, Bush the father told the
Balkan countries that, since the USSR had crumbled, they were going to have
to sign up for the Partnership for Peace (formerly NACC). Then, Hungary,
Romania and Bulgaria said yes. Only Yugoslavia said no. Only Yugoslavia
got bombed.

After Yugoslavia said no, Slovenia and Croatia then went into rebellion,
and they seceded from the otherwise historical six republics altogether of
federal Yugoslavia (otherwise presented by the media as a "Declaration of
Independence"). Germany previously supplied Slovenia and Croatia with
advanced weaponry, which served to foil the Yugoslav Federal Army.
Actually, the Prime Minister of Yugoslavia was not Slobodan Milosevic. The
Yugoslav Prime Minister was a Roman Catholic. His name was Ante Markovic,
and he was from Zagreb, Croatia. Mr. Milosevic's job at that time was
similar to state governor, and he had no power. It was Mr. Ante Markovic
who was in charge of the Yugoslav Federal Army, and his office was in
Belgrade.

With regard to Srebrenica in July, 1995, the Goldstone Srebrenica
Indictment, IT-95-18, admits, grudgingly, that five thousand armed
guerrillas, actually Islamist terrorists, were given sanctuary in
Srebrenica. During prior months, these guerrillas would make nighttime
forays into nearby small Serb villages, and then they would do what their
Islamist brothers have been doing at night for years in villages in Algeria.

Eventually, in 1995, these guerrillas attempted to escape to nearby Tuzla,
and there were casualties along the way. The Goldstone Srebrenica
Indictment consists of 58 paragraphs altogether. However, after several
months of forensic effort had gone by, only one paragraph, paragraph 20,
lists the details of the casualties, later described by the media as a
massacre. These details are shown within sub-paragraphs 1 through 7 under
paragraph 20. Sometimes, only 10 or 20 bodies are listed at a time.

Apparently, later on, these numbers were too small for Clinton. Also,
since then, the Islamists have become quite adept in, as they say, "moving
the bodies around". Eventually, lots and lots of bodies were to be moved
around, the better to make Clinton's speeches sound more plausible.

When news fabrication is allowed to take place, everything can change. As
an example of what can happen, the following true excerpt is presented,
before news fabrication, from the Milosevic "Blackbird" Speech, translated
by the U.S. Dept. of Commerce:

"Serbia has never had only Serbs living in it. Today, more than in the
past, members of other peoples and nationalities also live in it. This is
not a disadvantage for Serbia. I am truly convinced that it is its
advantage. National composition of almost all countries in the world today,
particularly developed ones, has also been changing in this direction.
Citizens of different nationalities, religions, and races have been living
together more and more frequently and more and more successfully."

• Re: Weapons of Mass Destruction - Rep. Tom DeLay — JOYCE Stringer, Sat Sep 14 05:12