Devvy Kidd
A RESPONSE TO KOFI ANNAN AND PRESIDENT BUSH
Sat Sep 14 17:38:45 2002
208.152.73.166

A RESPONSE TO KOFI ANNAN AND PRESIDENT BUSH


By Devvy Kidd
September 14, 2002
NewsWithViews.com

Today the airwaves were filled with speeches by UN Secretary-General Kofi
Annan and President George Bush. Following these speeches which reeked of
"global" worship as the world's silver bullet for peace, every single pundit on
the television set focused on the rhetoric of Annan and Bush without a single
reference to America's sovereignty.

Most of the day all commentary consisted of Mr. Bush proving his case and
America's subservient role to the UN. Nary a breath of reference to our
sovereignty or the real agenda of the UN. Walter Cronkite, a media icon for so
many Americans, said the following in 'A Reporter's Life': "A system of world
government is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and
yield up their precious sovereignty."

Without a doubt, Saddam Hussein is one of the lowest life forms on this globe.
No doubt his soul will be consigned to the bowels of Hell for all eternity like
other murdering tyrants before him. Yes, he deserves to be taken out by the
people of his country, and no doubt he's developing all kinds of horrifying
weapons - the same kind now held by Russia, Communist China, the United
States and Israel, to name a few.

Kofi Annan is a Communist, just like his good friend, Nelson Mandela. They
are Reds, period. The United Nations is nothing more than a Communist
organization out to destroy the sovereignty of all countries and turn them into
states of a one world government. Today Annan spoke as if he had been
anointed King of the Planet.

Annan spoke of "member states" as if the united States of America were not a
country, but rather just a state of this insidious "global community." He spoke
of "multilateralism" being the only way that "member states" could function
on this earth. He spoke of Iraq's continued defiance of UN mandated
conditions. He referred to the attendees as "Excellencies."

In his speech, President Bush said that since the end of the Gulf War, Iraq had
repeatedly violated U.N. resolutions. He said, "As a symbol of our commitment
to human dignity, the United States will return to UNESCO. This organization
has been reformed and America will participate fully in its mission to advance
human rights and tolerance and learning." Spoken like the true globalist
serving his world masters. But, what does UNESCO, another evil arm of the
UN, have to do with Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction?

His most dangerous words were:

"The conduct of the Iraqi regime is a threat to the authority of the United
Nations, and a threat to peace....The United States helped found the United
Nations. We want the United Nations to be effective, and respectful, and
successful. We want the resolutions of the world's most important multilateral
body to be enforced."

Following all this bluster on the floor of the UN, the talking head shows
followed suit. The most egregious dialogue came from the very popular,
constitutionally deficient and factually challenged, Bill O'Reilly. During his
interview with Scott Ritter, Mr. O said that America had every "right" to go
into Iraq and remove Hussein. It was our "right" to invade without
provocation, another sovereign country, topple it's government and declare
ourselves champion of human rights as a world bully.

The Constitution of the United States

It is the supreme law of this land. In 1945, the United States unlawfully
entered into a treaty with the Communist UN. First, the Seventeenth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was never ratified. This is an indisputable
fact backed up by indisputable documents. Therefore, the U.S. Senate seated in
1945, had no legal authority to sit in office, much less vote on any treaty. This
is a legal fact. We have not had a legally serving Senate since 1913.

However, since few believe we are a nation of laws anymore if it threatens
their job or material possessions, let us then move on to just who is the UN?
Were they in part created by the U.S. as Mr. Bush touted today? The UN
scheme was masterminded by many, notable was Alger Hiss, a spy and a
traitor.

The UN is a private group of individuals who are funded by 170 countries on
the globe. The UN is not a government. This organization run by Communists,
invites diplomats from all these countries to hold meetings to further a one
world government and absolutely crush any national sovereignty of any
country.

The United States of America does not enter into treaties with private
organizations. You will never see the U.S. enter into a treaty with Ducks
Unlimited or Girl Scouts of America. This is a fact that seems to escape people
like Dan Rather, Shawn Hannity and Phil Donahue.

America's Participation in the UN is Unconstitutional

Many Americans simply don't understand the danger or the legality of our
participation with this private organization. I would invite everyone to read a
scholarly presentation on how the UN Charter violates our supreme law of the
land from Judge J.J. Boesel at:
http://www.devvy.com/boesel_20000205.html

It is quite obvious in listening to the responses from "Congressional leaders"
like Daschle, Gephart, Luger and others, that they have no regard for the
Constitution nor any understanding of our Founding Fathers when it comes to
getting ourselves entangled in every tribal squabble or Middle-Eastern flap that
comes down the pipeline. However, there seems to be no end to the hypocrisy
of people like President Bush and the Congress when it comes to rogue states
like North Korea.

Every year we ship tens of millions of tons of food to feed the starving in North
Korea while their government spends all their resources developing weapons of
mass destruction that they would like to use on US as soon as they feel they're
ready. Tomorrow when you get up at dawn to go to work, don't forget to
thank Mr. Bush and Congress for allowing you to work your fingers to the
bone to fund the North Koreans and their quest for weapons of mass
destruction.

The Right to Defend Our Borders

America is not in a self-defense posture. Mr. Bush is taking America into
dangerous territory that will draw the continued wrath of terrorist nations:
Being an aggressor, based on a future threat that may or may not materialize.
I love our Republic. I don't want to see one more American die from terrorism,
but this course that Bush is pursuing will come back to haunt this nation a
thousand fold.

We have the unquestioned right to defend our borders, our shores, our land
and our people. Of course, little to no effort is being made in that direction.
Our borders are still open to any terrorist or murder who wants to walk across
them. Any effort at identifying individuals from terrorists states is met
immediately with shrieks from race racketeers who make their living yowling
about "racial profiling."

The American people are in grave danger today as they were a year ago. There
are no guarantees or promises about safety and security and that is why it is
imperative that our military be brought home. Our military is here for US, not
to attack countries around the world for threats, real or about some vagaries
that may happen in the future. We would condemn such actions, i.e. China
going after Taiwan. Are the American people ready to see thousands of body
bags shipped home to attack China if they go after Taiwan? I haven't met a
single one.

War can only be declared by an act of Congress - a lawfully seated Congress.
While Mr. Bush will put up a public horse and pony show about "consulting
with Congress," he will get his way. As Mr. Clinton said back in August of 1998
while in Ireland, "...You know, by the time you become the leader of a
country, someone else makes all the decisions." Anyone who thinks George
Bush, Jr., is calling the shots, is still in an extreme case of denial.

A Warning Ignored

Congressman Utt from California, Congressional Record, House of
Representatives January 15, 1962 Page 215:

"You can expect to see a one world government, Communist controlled, under
the United Nations. You will see the United Nations run up astronomical debts
which we, under the terms of the treaty, are bound to pay."

His full speech, a critically important one on the UN, can be viewed at:
http://www.devvy.com/utt_20020410.html

Back in 1969, former Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Taft Benson spoke pearls
of wisdom when he said:

"Already, I can hear the chorus chanting "isolationism, isolationism, he's
turning back the clock to isolationism." How many use that word without
having the slightest idea of what it really means! The so-called isolationism of
the United States in past decades is pure myth. What isolationism? Long before
the current trend of revoking our Declaration of Independence under the guise
of international cooperation, American influence and trade was felt in every
region of the globe. Individuals and private groups spread knowledge, business,
prosperity, religion, good will and, above all, respect throughout every foreign
continent.

"It was not necessary then for America to give up her independence to have
contact and influence with other countries. It is not necessary now. Yet, many
Americans have been led to believe that our country is so strong that will can
defend, feed and subsidize half the world, while at the same time believing that
we are so weak and "inter-dependent" that we cannot survive without pooling
our resources and sovereignty with those we subsidize. If wanting no part of
this kind of "logic" is isolationism, then it is time we brought it back into
vogue."

I wish I could say I support our President in his actions, but I cannot. Not
knowing what I do about the global agenda and the threat to our dear and
glorious Republic. Today Mr. Bush slapped the Constitution and the people of
this country in the face by going to a Communist organization and pleading
his case to America in harm's way as the aggressor.

© 2002 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
=======================================================================

US GOVT INSIDERS NOW BEGINNING TO SPILL
THE BEANS ON 9-11 / CIA CONNECTIONS

It looks like the one's with inside information are
starting to come out of the woodwork! Check out this
CBC Radio interview: An interview with Michael
Springmann exposes the CIA's links with the terrorist
attacks on September 11 Straight Goods reader
Ken MacAllister of Vancouver, BC writes:

"Michael Springmann worked for the US government
for 20 years with the foreign service and consulate.
He just went public with the story of his involvement
in a large scale CIA operation that brought hundreds
of people from the middle east to the US, issued them
passports and trained them to be terrorists. Springmann
says that the CIA is working closely with Bin Laden and
his operatives in Jeddah and has been since 1987.
The most haunting implication from this interview is
that all of the terrorist acts of late were planned and paid
for by the CIA with US taxpayers money so that the US
could legitimately bomb the hell out of Afghanistan..."

LINK below, for a printable version of this article as
it was received via email. This article is accompanied
by a vast amount of contact information :
http://www.radicalpress.com/news/activistskit.htm

• Hearing on the “Conflict with Iraq – An Israeli — C-SPAN, Sat Sep 14 19:20