John KaminskiNo plane hit the PentagonSun Sep 15 15:08:05 2002208.152.73.165 Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:28:09 -0400 From: John Kaminski skylax@comcast.net Repeat: The story saying a giant hijacked jetliner hit the Pentagon isfalse, and here's why: http://www.crc-internet.org/june2a.htm (site down)THE CLAIM THAT THE PENTAGON WAS NOT STRUCK BY A PLANE IS DELIBERATE DISINFORMATION http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hunthoax.html [SNIP]What happened? Oh, it is very simple, very sad and mathematical: the two planes collided after the Swiss air traffic controllers in Zurich had three times asked the crew of the Tupolev to lose height. In vain. For reasons unknown, the Russian pilot failed to reply, but he did begin to descend at the last moment. Too late: the pilot of the Boeing, alerted to the approach of the Tupolev by its alarm system, had already in its turn begun to lose height… to avoid a collision, thereby, alas, making it inevitable. Under the impact, the two planes shed flaming debris over a wide area, falling 11,000 m, onto the north bank of Lake Constance. The only question to be asked is that of responsibility. Why did the Russian plane take so long to react? And how explain the fact that the automatic alarm failed to advise the Boeing pilot of a safer course to avoid the Tupolev? But the fact remains, in all its indubitable horror: 71 persons perished, 69 of the victims being Russian, among whom 52 were minors and 20 children less than 14 years old, all en route to Barcelona where they were to spend their holidays. The remains of the bodies of the victims, mingled with that of the two planes, lay strewn over the undulating fields. The two black boxes of the Tupolev were located; they will undoubtedly provide answers to the questions asked. But a comparison with the alleged crash of the Pentagon, which left no visible trace of significant debris, neither engines, black boxes nor undercarriage, is eloquent! It allows us to see the difference between a real Boeing and a phantom Boeing…[SNIP]GO HERE FOR THE FULL STORY: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hunthoax.html =========================================================================THE EVIDENCE: One hole, 2 ˝ yards in diameter Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ˝ yards in diameter.Click for more: Re: The "OFFICIAL" Story is a LIE! (Flight 77) The Webfairy, Sun Sep 15 16:00
THE CLAIM THAT THE PENTAGON WAS NOT STRUCK BY A PLANE IS DELIBERATE DISINFORMATION http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hunthoax.html
[SNIP]What happened? Oh, it is very simple, very sad and mathematical: the two planes collided after the Swiss air traffic controllers in Zurich had three times asked the crew of the Tupolev to lose height. In vain. For reasons unknown, the Russian pilot failed to reply, but he did begin to descend at the last moment. Too late: the pilot of the Boeing, alerted to the approach of the Tupolev by its alarm system, had already in its turn begun to lose height… to avoid a collision, thereby, alas, making it inevitable. Under the impact, the two planes shed flaming debris over a wide area, falling 11,000 m, onto the north bank of Lake Constance. The only question to be asked is that of responsibility. Why did the Russian plane take so long to react? And how explain the fact that the automatic alarm failed to advise the Boeing pilot of a safer course to avoid the Tupolev? But the fact remains, in all its indubitable horror: 71 persons perished, 69 of the victims being Russian, among whom 52 were minors and 20 children less than 14 years old, all en route to Barcelona where they were to spend their holidays. The remains of the bodies of the victims, mingled with that of the two planes, lay strewn over the undulating fields. The two black boxes of the Tupolev were located; they will undoubtedly provide answers to the questions asked. But a comparison with the alleged crash of the Pentagon, which left no visible trace of significant debris, neither engines, black boxes nor undercarriage, is eloquent! It allows us to see the difference between a real Boeing and a phantom Boeing…[SNIP]GO HERE FOR THE FULL STORY: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hunthoax.html =========================================================================THE EVIDENCE: One hole, 2 ˝ yards in diameter Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ˝ yards in diameter.Click for more:
Main Page -09/18/02
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES