Linda Minor
Re: we must know our true enemy if we are to defeat it
Fri Sep 12 15:42:17 2003
64.140.158.240

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: we must know our true enemy if we are to defeat it
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:05:27 -0500
From: "Linda Minor" lminor@vvm.com
To: "APFN" APFN@apfn.org
CC: RAMillegan@aol.com , "Catherine Austin Fitts" catherine@solari.com

I beg to differ with this interpretation. The Jewish bankers are not at the top--merely in the front. There's a big difference. They are being used as nominal owners, but they do not own the actual title to the assets. They act as trustees, as do most investment bankers who control investments for pension plants and other pools of capital. They use "other people's money." We are the other people, and we let them do it because we want our pensions to keep making big returns. The true culprit is greed and the financial model that allows investment to be conducted with the protection of legal secrecy.

Linda Minor

See http://mypage.direct.ca/l/lbouchar/chapter2.htm

There are many individuals who focus on blaming the Jewish banking powers as the sole creators of currency creation and usury. No doubt a Jewish element had used these practices but they were not involved in creating the Bank of England. I consider this blaming of Jewish bankers, a red herring to divert culpability from the Crown of England in creating and sustaining these processes during the last three centuries. These processes have now expanded world wide.

Let us review some of the facts involved in the creation of The Bank of England:

In 1693, William Paterson proposed that the "Bank of England" be based on the idea of a "Fund of Perpetual Interest" which creates a permanent National Debt. Backers of Paterson’s idea were impressive. The spokesman was Michael Godfrey, a merchant of great substance. Other supporters were members of the leading City Livery Companies. Many were Members of Parliament and many were directly associated with the government of the City. Of the first twenty six members of the Court of Directors, six subsequently became Lord Mayor. All were solid in their support of the "Glorious Revolution" which was Protestants versus Catholics. All were Protestants.

The promoters had in mind a bank of issue which involved creating their own currency. They had long known that the most profitable source of income to the Goldsmith-Bankers were in their own "notes", which passed from hand to hand in the limited area where they were recognized. It would greatly enhance profits for a bank, if they could issue notes which would be recognized and accepted over an area far wider than any that the goldsmiths could command.

The Committee of the House of Commons, which grasped the implications, rejected Paterson’s scheme. These far-reaching and historic proposals were later deliberately placed, with obscure wording, at the end of an ordinary finance bill. The bill related to taxes on liquor, ale and custom duties. This process of concealing the intent of the bill contributed to it’s passing. Later, this underhanded process of introducing banking legislation appeared throughout the world.

The Act received the Royal Assent on 25th April 1694. Opponents of the Bank, in Privy Council, tried to get the granting of the commission postponed. Their attempt was stopped by the Queen, under specific orders of King William III who was away on a military campaign. On the 15th of June, a commission was issued under the great seal, to which was attached a draft of the proposed Charter. Sir William Ashurst, the Lord Mayor, and other city merchants were named as commissioners.

The corporate books were opened at Mercers Chapell on June 21st. The Book of Subscriptions first shows a sum of 10,000 pounds in the names of the King and Queen, followed by 1,267 individual shareholders. In all, there were 11 contributors of the permitted maximum amount of 10,000 pounds. They were the Earl of Portland, 6 individuals described only as Esquires, James de la Brettoniere of London, William Brownlowe of Woodcott, Surrey, Thomas Howard of Westminster, Thomas Mulsoe of the Middle Temple, Anthony Humberstone and Anthony Parsons (both of London). The remaining 4 subscribers of the maximum amount allowed were elected members of the first court of directors. They were Sir John Houblon and his brother Abraham, Theodore Janssen and Sir William Scawen.

The Governors and Directors were to be chosen each year between March 25 and April 25, by those shareholders who held no less than 500 pounds in stock. 633 shareholders were qualified to vote and this was done in Mercers Hall on Tuesday July 5th, 1694 at 8 a.m.. From this vote, the first Court of Directors was elected. The names inscribed in the Charter are:

Sir John Houblon (Governor)

Michael Godfrey (Deputy Governor)

Sir John Huband BT Sir James Houblon KT

Sir William Gore KT Sir William Scawen KT

Sir Henry Furnese KT Sir Thomas Abney KT

Sir William Hedges KT Brook Bridges

James Bateman George Boddington

Edward Clarke James Denew

Thomas Goddard Abraham Houblon

Gilbert Heathcote Theodore Janssen

John Lordell Samuel Lethieullier

William Paterson Robert Rathworth

John Smith Obadiah Sedgewick

Nathaniel Tench John Ward

The Charter was sealed at Powis House, Lincoln Inn Fields by Sir John Somers, Keeper of the Seal on July 27th. The 6th act of the 1694 Bank Act was evidently designed to prevent the bank from ever falling into the hands of a clique (through returning Directors) because two thirds could not be re-elected. This was faithfully observed until 1872. In that year, the proportion retiring was changed, and in 1892, the practice was dropped.

It is interesting to see the disinformation put forward on the theory of a Jewish conspiracy in developing the Bank of England. Many have pointed to Nathan Amschel Rothschild as being a great influence. Not only was he not yet born but the first Rothschild Merchant Bank was not created until the early 1800s, approximately one hundred and ten years later. There is even an instance were the Bank of England refused to honor the Rothschild Merchant Bank notes. The course of action taken by Nathan Rothschild, was to send one of his clerks, on the hour, with Bank of England notes for conversion throughout one day. The Bank of England Directors convened with him that evening and agreed to honour the Rothschild’s Merchant Bank issue from that day onward. This illustration, as well as the process used for creating the Bank of England, shows us that no Jewish banking conspiracy controlled the Bank of England at that time.

The creation of this bank was done through the efforts of English Merchants and Goldsmiths, stimulated and ordered by the King and Queen of the realm. Later, the Rothschild’s influence on British economics increased dramatically because of events surrounding the Battle of Waterloo. A quick recap of this famous battle will clarify the way the Rothschilds benefited....

In any event, the results of the 18th of June fighting became known to the Rothschild’s and the information was delivered to England in spite of a fierce channel storm. While British shareholders, believing that the battle was lost, were dumping their various stocks, the Rothschild’s, being the sole owners of news of the victory at Waterloo, were able to tremendously increase their holdings at bargain prices. This is how they became a foremost power in the British economy. Another opportunity for the Rothschilds to greatly increase their influence in England was due to their involvement in stopping the stockmarket crash of 1825. They brought in a large amount of gold from Paris to shore up finances in England.

These historical facts disprove that there was ever a Jewish conspiracy in the creation of the Bank of England in 1694. The Bank of England became historically known as a stronghold of the Whigs and a bulwark of the Protestant Succession.

++++++++++++

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

My original book had traced and named the shadowy figures in the United States who planned the Federal Reserve Act. I now discovered that the men whom I exposed in 1952 as the shadowy figures behind the operation of the Federal Reserve System were themselves shadows, the American fronts for the unknown figures who became known as the "London Connection." I found that notwithstanding our successes in the Wars of Independence of 1812 against England, we remained an economic and financial colony of Great Britain. For the first time, we located the original stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks and traced their parent companies to the London Connection.

***

February 15, 1791

(The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. by H. E. Bergh, Vol. III, p. 145 ff.)

The bill for establishing a national bank, in 1791, undertakes, among other things,--

1. To form the subscribers into a corporation.

2. To enable them, in their corporate capacities, to receive grants of lands; and, so far, is against the laws of mortmain.

3. To make alien subscribers capable of holding lands; and so far is against the laws of alienage.

4. To transmit these lands, on the death of a proprietor, to a certain line of successors; and so far, changes the course of descents.

5. To put the lands out of the reach of forfeiture, or escheat; and so far, is against the laws of forfeiture and escheat.

6. To transmit personal chattels to successors, in a certain line; and so far, is against the laws of distribution.

7. To give them the sole and exclusive right of banking, under the national authority; and, so far, is against the laws of monopoly.

8. To communicate to them a power to make laws, paramount to the laws of the states; for so they must be construed, to protect the institution from the control of the state legislatures; and so probably they will be construed.

I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground--that all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states, or to the people (12th amend.). To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.

The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution.





----- Original Message -----
From: APFN
To: succeed@alt3.net ; APFN Yahoogroups ; APFN SMARTGROUP
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:12 AM
Subject: we must know our true enemy if we are to defeat it

we must know our true enemy if we are to defeat it
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=44390;title=APFN

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: The enemy - money power.
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:38:00 +1000
From: "Joe Bryant"
To:


In Remembrance of the September Dead!

It is foolish to think that an infinitesimal desert state and its partisans
in America could overthrow the sovereignty of the American government, take
control of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches, and such
agencies as the Federal Reserve, IMF, CIA, and embark US on a global war
against the Arab world. It takes a vast and very rich Conspiracy and a
century. The Conspiracy was described exactly more than a century ago in
Europe and by President Wilson, long before this evil little state and its
partisans were born.

The world is under siege by a European hierarchy of banking families, at the
top largely Jewish, the money changers and money lenders of history. They
are already the richest people on earth but it is not enough. They have a
Faustian Grand Plan. They mean to own or control everything of value on
earth. Their weapons: MONEY and DEBT-and Washington.

The rise of the Conspiracy over the last two centuries parallels the rise of
zionism. This is not a coincidence. Early on, the Conspiracy realized that
it needed a strong political agency, zionism, and its own country where it
would be free from all governmental oversight and create the murderous rogue
state (israel) that menaces the world today through Washington. (The two
were joined at the hip decades ago by the Conspiracy.)

The Conspiracy is invisible. It functions through its network of global and
central banks and their many subsidized agents, organizations and fronts
around the world. It financed the Morgans and the Harrimans. Even the
haughty kingpin of the American Petroleum Cartel, David, is its lackey just
like his ancestors. It controls the currency of all the major nations
including Russia and China. It "takes" hundreds of billions from the
American people every year. It has no regard for human life except as a
resource for labor, taxes and armies. It has no god; money is its messiah.

A century ago, the Conspiracy had bankrupt Europe with its many wars (the
lifeblood of the Conspiracy). A peaceful America, protected by two oceans,
was on the verge of becoming the most powerful and prosperous nation on
earth and the Conspiracy did not "own" it. This was "unacceptable". A
naïve President Wilson was surrounded by zionists: Baruch, Untermeyer,
Warburg, Schiff, Brandeis, Meyer and House. The Conspiracy wished to take
control of American money, "mobilize its credit" to finance World War I and
overthrow the Czar (for Russian money). And it needed America to assure
victory over Germany (its hated enemy even before WWI). Wilson was
pressured into signing the Federal Reserve Act and to declare war on
Germany. Later he was to say, "I have involuntarily ruined my government".
Ominously, he warned,

"Some of the biggest men in the United States.are afraid of something. They
know there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so
interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above
their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." (And it has grown
enormously from a century of war.)

The Conspiracy mandated that Capitalism become the "state religion" of
America and the world (cheap resources and labor and freedom from taxes and
regulations). A Red Scare began the century long war on Communism. It was
as phony as the "war on terrorism" of today, all bugaboos and demagoguery.
Every politician had to pledge his/her allegiance to Capitalism. Communists
were purged from government, communications, education, industry; tens of
millions died for it in the Conspiracy wars. Today it's still the same:
"globalization", "deregulation" "privatization" and "tax exemption for the
rich".

The Conspiracy financed massive donations to two of the most prestigious
universities in America, turning them into centers of zionist politics and
activities. One has supplied an extraordinary number of officials to the
Washington government. The other created the ultimate terror weapon mostly
by Jewish/zionist scientists to use on Germany. It financed the
Jewish/zionist purchase of entire niche industries: merchandizing, movies,
real estate, television, national magazines and newspapers, jewelry, and now
professional sports from which they have amassed a vast wealth in the
trillions, sheltered from taxes in many foundations and offshore havens.
Cash businesses seem to be preferred.

After World War II, the Conspiracy corrupted American elections with money
and subverted Washington officials with threats of heavily financed
opponents. Truman said that zionist pressure for israel was the greatest
political pressure he had ever encountered. Anyone who resisted was
threatened with ruin or eliminated (JFK?). The Senate was purged of all but
zionist sycophants. In the 60's when Washington docilely surrendered to
israel's murder of American sailors on the USS Liberty the Conspiracy knew
it was in political control of America. But what about the American people?

In the 70's when the destruction of the Savings Banks and Savings & Loans
was planned, the Conspiracy recognized that it needed an epochal event like
the Reichstag Fire and/or Pearl Harbor to subdue t

• BIN LADEN SAYS 'WE DIDN'T DO 911' — Henry Ayre, Fri Sep 12 15:50
• The Al-Qa'idah group had nothing to do with the 11 Septembe — jihaad.faithweb.com, Fri Sep 12 16:00