Martin F. Abernathy
Lawsuit -- Part2
Wed Aug 27 19:30:07 2003
138.16.136.150

This ruling gives the impression Plaintiff Schlund agrees that mental

telepathy is possible, which he does not. Let this court fully

understand that Plaintiff Schlund has never asserted mental telepathy

and does not believe mental telepathy is possible. Plaintiff Schlund

factually knows from information supplied by the Government itself that

the Government uses electronic methods and instruments, including

electronic devices to conduct surveillance and other methods to conduct

such information gathering, to transfer their voices, sounds and force

to torture a person using such electronic system(s). The Government

always asserts against such targeted persons that he/she may be a

lunatic asserting “surreal and fantastic” claims, despite the claims are

mathematically easy to factually prove against the individuals

conducting the illegal intrusions using electronic mediums to piggyback

off existing established platforms and instruments owned and paid for by

others (factually proven in Koyomejian v. United States). Since the

Koyomejian decision and others, the DOJ and DEA have intensely attempted

to guard their electronic systems’ capabilities and activities from the

public while violating the rights of individuals and entities in Arizona

and elsewhere in the United States. The covert nature of this fact is

to mislead the public and suppress knowledge to the public and prevent

individual liability to said persons who utilize the technologies for

surveillance and torture activities which violates Plaintiff Schlund’s

and others’ constitutional rights.



The Defendants know that the use of implants to remove political

witnesses is the perfect crime. It can be denied under the cover of law

to protect fabricated or real investigations and the technology used

cannot be reverse engineered by anyone other then governments or the

corporations that secretly work with or for them. Plaintiff Schlund

does not have access to super conductors or secret power sources like

plutonium or other types of secret power supplies or batteries but

Plaintiff can easily prove that the technology exists and can make a

paper airplane to show jets can fly. Expert witnesses, eye witnesses,

testimony and demonstrations are all that is required to prove that the

electronic basics exist, and are being used by the Government and that

the torture is real and conducted and controlled by the Government to

attempt to cover-up their crimes not the crimes of Plaintiff Schlund,

but their crimes and electronic gamesmanship that hurts others, as well

as Plaintiff Schlund.

Plaintiff Schlund reminds the Defendants and the courts that when the

Nazis under Hitler injected the Jews in their necks after taking them

into custody, that the Nuremberg trials convicted these criminals for

Crimes Against Humanity. It was never determined what they injected but

only that the injections were done under the cover of law against the

will of those being injected and that the injections made them sick or

resulted in their torture or suffering at the hand of the government.



This is what happened to Plaintiff Schlund and the same words can be

used that convicted the Nazis of similar crimes. Plaintiff Schlund

understands that laws are only used against the enemies of the

government and never against those protected by the government. In other

words, if Plaintiff Schlund was to commit this same crime, he would be

prosecuted and imprisoned but the government employees are above any

laws because they commit their crimes under the authority of a warrant.

The Government’s employees are protected and are above any laws as they

offered Plaintiff Schlund if he joined them.



Let this court and the Defendants fully understand that Plaintiff

Schlund read the Nazi research from the concentration camps using sounds

to torture, this was in the CIA files in the Don Bolles Papers and

Plaintiff understands how and why the government designed these

torture devices to destroy the lives of innocent whistle blowers

and political witnesses like Plaintiff. Plaintiff Schlund had

all the research and the designing and manufacturing files from the CIA,

DEA and NSA and all the files from the Surveillance Court, Justice

Department and others on the use of these weapons under the cover of law

against innocent Americans.



All of this is provable in a trial but not before a corrupt judge who is

being paid to stop a trial or any other legal proceedings to protect the

corrupt judges and agents and those they work for, like George W. Bush.

In a fair trial before a non-corrupt judge, the government would have no

chance of disproving assertions made by Plaintiff.



From what Plaintiff Schlund has learned and understands, he was, and

continues to be, under a fabricated investigation for alleged drug

manufacturing, drug smuggling, drug dealing, mass murder, gun running,

thievery and for other crimes. In truth, Plaintiff Schlund has never

made any drugs nor has he ever smuggled any drugs or chemicals into the

United States. Plaintiff Schlund is not a drug dealer and has never

killed anyone. He has never run any guns or sold any guns that were, to

Plaintiff’s knowledge, to be used or sold illegally to anyone.



Plaintiff Schlund does not steal and is as good of a citizen as he can

possibly be while he is under torture by the corrupt judges and corrupt

agents of the federal and state government.



Let the court fully understand that Plaintiff Schlund does not possess

the knowledge to make any drugs and never has and only knows what the

DEA had Carl Altz/John Green who worked for them tell Plaintiff.

Plaintiff Schlund has been framed and already tried in a federal trial

with the federal court acquitting him and the Judge calling the

government’s activities of framing him outrageous conduct of the United

States. The federal court demanded the arrest of the agents involved in

Plaintiff Schlund’s arrest and prosecution for obstruction of justice

and perjury in the framing of Plaintiff to remove him as a political

witness.



In Plaintiff Schlund’s 1978 trial, the DEA and Sheriff’s Office did

threaten to murder the children and wife of Plaintiff’s first witness,

Bob Snow, if he dared to testify for Plaintiff and had also threatened

Plaintiff’s second witness, William Schlund with prosecution if he dared

to testify. These threats against Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses continue

to present with the courts and government agents continuously making

threats by various means, including the use of electronic force for the

intended purpose of selectively targeting such witnesses, including

continuous threats against Plaintiff and his witnesses and their

children.



Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses and their children have been

electronically monitored and physically trespassed upon, threatened and

tortured through electronic and other used technologies designed for

this and other purposes. These corrupt agents threaten such witnesses

and Plaintiff Schlund by using electronic implants and torture.



Other witnesses of Plaintiff Schlund have been assassinated. Only a Nazi

court could allow this kind of Obstruction of Justice and Witness

Tampering under the cover of law. Many of Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses

are now in fear for their lives or their wife’s and children’s life and

the government continues to harass witnesses and dissidents that are

threatening to them to protect the Bush family and others as they

plunder the treasury of the United States and use the Justice Department

to remove the political witnesses and dissidents, as set forth in the

Bolles Papers.



The court should further understand that others, including the DEA, have

repeatedly threatened to murder Plaintiff Schlund if he dares continue

these lawsuits and have tortured him continually for the past 25 years

since Plaintiff refused to join the DEA and help in the many political

assassinations and the running of the drugs and the fixing of elections.

The DEA solicited Plaintiff Schlund to kill some young girls they had

been providing to Federal Judge William P. Copple for sex. This was in

1977, after the DEA had offered Plaintiff Schlund a position in the DEA.



When Plaintiff refused, the government targeted and tortured him.

After Plaintiff Schlund’s arrest, Judge Copple was assigned to

Plaintiff’s trial. Judge Copple then removed himself the day before

Plaintiff was to file the recusal against him for being a corrupt judge

detailing what Plaintiff had read in Judge Copple’s CIA file in the

files Plaintiff has always called the Don Bolles Papers.



Let the Defendants fully understand that Plaintiff Schlund was briefing

the FBI on the CIA and DEA plans to fix the presidential elections of

the United States when Plaintiff was injected with CIA designed implants

to torture him. The surveillance court and other courts refer to these

devices as monitoring devices and pretends they are using these devices

in real investigations. Any witness complaining of torture is

discredited and the Government claims that their claims of torture are

only their attempts at escaping the Government’s investigation.



If the court chooses to deny this, Plaintiff Schlund demands under the ruling

of Doran v. McGuiness, supra, to be allowed to remove two of the devices

in trial or under the supervision of the Court and videotape the removal

to prove that the devices are real. Plaintiff Schlund does not know the

location of other devices that were also installed in Plaintiff by the

government. The removal of only two devices will not stop all of

Plaintiff’s torture and other devices were also installed and if

Plaintiff removes the devices that he knows of, others will be injected

under the protection of corrupt judges of the court. The court can

subpoena the DEA and person(s), including Agent John Albano, into court

to testify to their injection of Plaintiff Schlund and can subpoena the

FBI, including Agent Adam S., into court to testify to the devices being

CIA devices.

Plaintiff Schlund has found that the court always runs from the truth

and never looks for the truth and always just tries to make the person

being tortured look like they are crazy or involved in some crime.

Justice and the truth are easy to find. It is easy for the court to

subpoena the government agencies into court to document the truth. The

court can also just call George W. Bush’s corrupt appointees into court

to do the cover up.



Further, Defendants and the courts are on notice to understand that many

records held by the DEA and others are not real and do not represent the

truth and were obtained by the DEA committing perjury to the court to

obtain the warrants. Plaintiff Schlund believes the same to be true

with regard to the ATF and other files. Plaintiff Schlund believes that

the ATF files were generated to protect the DEA and cover up the DEA’s

taking of Plaintiff’s guns while Plaintiff was working with the FBI and

the guns were then used in assassination attempts against Plaintiff and

were to be used as “throw down” weapons after Plaintiffs assassination

by the government.



When Plaintiff called the police to report these guns missing, the Phoenix police

called the FBI and then called back Plaintiff and told Plaintiff that they could not

take a police report because the guns were taken by federal agents of the DEA and

that they were above the authority of local police and that this was a federal

matter that the FBI was aware of. The FBI could not act on these crimes

because Janet Reno was secretly working for the Bush family and

protected the DEA as John Ashcroft now does. The FBI, IRS and the other

agencies stopped all of the assassination attempts against Plaintiff but

the torture of Plaintiff continues because the torture is done under the

cover of law in surreal and fantastic investigations authorized under

perjury and conversations obtained from Plaintiff while being tortured

for the conversations or in exchange for relief from torture. These

conversations were then submitted to the court under perjury.



While Plaintiff Schlund’s family was asleep in their home and also while

in Mexico on fishing trips, the DEA used a gas on Plaintiff and his

family to place them in a state that they could not wake up from. This

gas was used on the small children of Plaintiff and others which

resulted in placing them in a state where they were unable to resist or

awaken that allowed the government to violate them as they pleased.



The DEA would then inject drugs into the bodies of Plaintiff’s family

and him. These drugs kept them in a drugged state where the government

could hypnotize Plaintiff and his family and others and then make them

perform certain tasks for the government to take photos of them so the

government could generate fabricated and false evidence against them to

discredit them to cover-up the crimes committed by the government. This

was done to cover-up crimes that Plaintiff Schlund and his wife had

witnessed or had personal knowledge of. These crimes were committed by

the government.



Sometimes Plaintiff and his family would be kidnapped by force from

their home and would be drugged and kept in a drugged state by the DEA

for up to three days at a time. During these kidnappings the government

would repeatedly and continually work on them with drugs and hypnotize

them to make them perform acts for the government as needed to force

them to do things so the government could take photos and films of them

to discredit them and remove them as credible witnesses against the Bush

family and those that worked under the Bush family doing political

assassinations, running drugs, money laundering and fixing public

elections.



After these photo and film sessions Plaintiff and his family would be

returned to their home and would wake up in their beds like nothing had

happened. Sometimes, upon waking up, Plaintiff would still have the

cotton ball on his arm where the IV had been removed from his arm.

Other times, he would be injected in his foot with the antidote to the

drugs that he was kept on during these drugged interrogation and/or

filmed sessions.



Plaintiff’s innocent children would miss school and he would miss work

during these political kidnappings and they would all wake up at the

same time. Sometimes they would wake up in the morning and other times

they would all wake up at 6:00 p.m. or 9:00 p.m. with up to three (3)

days having expired while they were in this drugged state held by the

government.



In Mexico, Plaintiff and family did wake up on the beach at 1:00 p.m. on

an August day with the temperature around 120 degrees. They would be

suffering from dehydration and unable to account for any of the missed

and elapsed time. Friends that were on the fishing trip with them would

also wake up at the same time and ask what happened. We were all gassed

that night by the DEA. All of their personal items and things would be

gone and they would later receive them back in the mail after returning

to the United States.



During these drugged programmings and interrogations by the government,

Plaintiff would be hypnotized and directed to make a statement when a

key word was later spoken. This allowed the government to record these

statements to attempt to prove he was guilty of things which in truth he

had no knowledge of or part



Main Page - Thursday, 08/28/03

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)