william_russellsb
911 US Officials Slaughtered Their Own People
Mon Aug 25 00:04:58 2003
64.140.159.184

Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:22:27 -0000
From: "william_russellsb" william_russellsb@hotmail.com
Subject: 911 US Officials Slaughtered Their Own People

The terrorists did not actually need to be aboard the ships to hijack
them and hit the towers. Using radar beacons (set in the buildings)
and remote control would have produced the same effect. Perhaps it is
the reason why so many of them are found to be still alive.
http://christianparty.net/terroristsalive.htm

What does stand out as particularly suspicious and still unexplained
is that fires raged out of control beneath THREE of the collapsed
towers for ONE HUNDRED DAYS, clearly indicating the presence of some
kind of substance utilized in the demolition of the structures. The
Twin Towers did not fall because of plane impacts or fires. They fell
because they were also filled with dynamite. Firefighters told they
heard explosions that occurred after the airplanes hit the buildings.
Most likely explosives were placed on structural supports in the
towers (as was done in Oklahoma City), and these controlled
implosions snuffed out the lives of three thousand people. Bohemian
Grove members are still discussing a convenient cover-up during their
annual "Lakeside Talks".
http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/bohos/lakesidetalks2003.html

It is now obvious that these attacks were staged by the US
administration in order to fuel its military budget and engage in
wars for industrial interests. The hawks killed their own people,
except the few select CEO who were invited at a breakfast meeting at
Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, Nebraska on the morning of September
11, guests of Warren Buffett (isn't he the same guy who has
guaranteed that the United States will suffer a nuclear attack by
terrorists?).

Offutt Air Force Base is the base that Bush flew to on September 11,
supposedly because it is the headquarters of the E-4B, the aircraft
that is the "command, control and communications center to direct
U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders and coordinate actions by
civil authorities". He wanted to be on the scene in person,
particularly as there was fear that the terrorists were in possession
of the secret codes by which they could electronically impersonate
Bush in giving military commands (interesting how we have heard
nothing more of that story). So how much of a coincidence is it that
this meeting with Warren Buffett was at the same air force base that
Bush flew to (apparently Bush intended to fly directly to Offutt, but
had to stop for refueling in Louisiana)? Is it possible that
Buffett's invitation to a bunch of 'important' New York City
executives for a breakfast meeting at an air force base in Nebraska
(just think about how weird that is!) was an attempt to save the
lives of the invitees? Anyway, Warren Buffet's business seems to have
benefited from these events and it allows him to become the 2nd
wealthiest man in the world.

By the way, who benefited from the suspiciously high numbers of put
options purchased prior to September 11 for shares in companies whose
stock prices subsequently plummeted, on the supposition that whoever
was behind the hijacking was also behind most of the purchases of
these put options? And what was the role of the new executive
director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard, who handled these transactions?

Other "wise men" met at the Ritz-Carlton in Washington, D.C. Present
were former secretary of defense Frank Carlucci, former secretary of
state James Baker III, and representatives of the bin Laden family.
They may also have enjoyed great investments through the Carlyle
Group. " Among those associated with Carlyle are former U.S.
president George Bush Sr., former U.K. prime minister John Major, and
former president of the Philippines Fidel Ramos. And Carlyle has
counted George Soros, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Alsaud
of Saudi Arabia, and Osama bin Laden's estranged family among its
high-profile clientele. The group has been able to parlay its
political clout into a lucrative buyout practice (in other words,
purchasing struggling companies, turning them around, and selling
them for huge profits)--everything from defense contractors to
telecommunications and aerospace companies."
http://www.redherring.com/vc/2002/0111/947.html

The Rumsfeld Commission was very prophetic concerning the attacks:
« History is replete with instances in which warning signs were
ignored and change resisted until an external, "improbable" event
forced resistant bureaucracies to take action. The question is
whether the U.S. will be wise enough to act responsibly and soon
enough to reduce U.S. space vulnerability. Or whether, as in the
past, a disabling attack against the country and its people-a "Space
Pearl Harbor"-will be the only event able to galvanize the nation and
cause the U.S. Government to act. We are on notice, but we have not
noticed. »
"Report of the Commission to Assess U.S. National Security Space
Management and Organization», January 11, 2001, chaired by Donald
Rumsfeld.
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/space20010111.html

Another Rand Corporation executive gives further details:
« We try to get our arms around Al-Qaeda, the organization-or maybe
the movement-associated with bin Laden. [.] You have to pause here
and think for a moment, go back to the bombing of the World Trade
Center in 1993. Now, putting aside whether it was possible to
actually topple the North Tower onto the South Tower and kill 60,000
people, consider the goal. [.] They will find other weapons and
tactics and means to reach their targets. And here is an obvious
class of weapon choices: ultralights, UAVs, all types of distance and
stand-off weapons, surface-to-air missiles, rocket-propelled grenades
fired from a distance, remote control mortars, and Man-Portable Air
Defense Systems (MANPADS). »
Bruce Hoffman, mars 2001, Rand Corporation.
« Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - UAVs »,
http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/uav.htm


Take a look at Donald Rumsfeld's confidence concerning the Pentagon
attack on October 12:
"It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using
any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time
and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're
talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight
filed with our citizens, and the MISSILE [sic!] to damage this
building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.
The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the
terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them."
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html
He did know what he was talking about since he surveyed the Pentagon
damages on September 11.
http://www.army.mil/attack4.htm
Check out the picture gallery below.
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

Rumsfeld is an evil genius that has probably also much more to tell
us concerning these attacks. Things that would make his poetry sound
more understandable to the illiterate sheep.

"Happenings
You're going to be told lots of things.
You get told things every day that don't happen.
It doesn't seem to bother people, they don't-
It's printed in the press.
The world thinks all these things happen.
They never happened.
Everyone's so eager to get the story
Before in fact the story's there
That the world is constantly being fed
Things that haven't happened.
All I can tell you is,
It hasn't happened.
It's going to happen."
-Feb. 28, 2003, Department of Defense briefing
http://slate.msn.com/id/2081042

• YES they did,this is how and why — Tom, Mon Aug 25 21:15
• Rumsfeld Commission — various, Mon Aug 25 15:54
• "Fightback against the Patriot Act." — VETERANS FOR PEACE, Mon Aug 25 00:35