COMMENTS FLIGHT 77
COMMENTS FLIGHT 77 Page 4
Mon Jul 28 18:33:02 2003
208.152.73.116

Your 2,109 search results for "APFN"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/search/results.pl?q=APFN&x=48&y=7&recipe=bbcfour&scope=bbcfour&tab=www

COMMENTS FLIGHT 77 Page 4
... http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm . 911 - TERROR IN AMERICAN - PARTS 1 - 4 ...
live.cgcu.net/links?go=http:%2F%2Fwww.cyberspaceor ...

Date: 3/17/02 1:17:30 PM Pacific Standard Time

Hi Kent, Been doing some more digging, because after I read this report and its very informative historical info I think it is quite possible to prove the flight path and damage do not support the 757 conclusion. I believe I have found a photo from a Spanish site which shows no HOLE previous to the secondary round of explosions as reported on the Washington Post site. I will send that link as well.
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/77comment4.html

Hi Kent,

While extensively reviewing dozens of web sites, photos and stories concerning the Pentagon I noted several important details which perhaps unintentionally misled many people. The first critical detail is the time of the event itself. Many photos and stories placed the 757 striking the Pentagon anywhere from 9:20 to 9:43 am. While this may not seem important it is the key to correcting the 30 minute window in which a section of outer ring E actually collapsed.

This link is to the Spanish site: http://www.elcorreodigital.com/portada/noticias/ataque/galeria1w.html

The first photo I believe shows the first initial moments after the first explosion. Because the picture was small and the building quite dark enlarging the image did not reveal what I believe is the next important clue which is the arrival of the first red fire truck. I have combined three photos to show what this entire debate is about: namely the missing 757. The french site and several others used photos directly from the Pentagons own site and I also downloaded their images to see if they supported the angle of entry into the building, the stated amount of penetration and structural damage as cited by the wash. Post: Rebuilding the Pentagon,

the sun http://www.sun-sentinel.com/graphics/news/terror/pentagon.html

CNN / www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/interactive/terror.3d/content1.html 

and here http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Sep2001/010914-F-8006R-003.jpg

[from this page http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Sep2001 /]

this is a large image showing great detail of a very powerful explosion but not from a 757. The image has been noted by many people but the critical aspect to this is keeping in mind the flight path into the Pentagon would have placed that 757 directly into the left side. Look at the monitor resting on the shelf. The clean edge which has no fire damage down the middle but in the rear. The front of the Pentagon did not collapse for thirty minutes. Now look at the middle photo in the attached file. This had to be taken shortly after the Spanish photo 1w. There is no hole and there is no evidence of a 757 striking the Pentagon. The defenselink site has several photos of the Area in Question prior to the collapse. The entry angle on many news sites states that the 757 flew just above ground level straight over the helicopter pad and into the bottom floors. The explosion however seems to come from below allright but around the entire section which was being remodeled. That first photo shows thick smoke from the area just in front of the trailer/fence but it also shows puffs of smoke coming from further down as well. The time sequence coupled with the odd video showing the wrong date and time gives the impression that portion of the E ring collapsed with the strike of a 757. But that is not what the evidence actually shows. Another reason for confusion was this action by the Pentagon: {This image was captured prior to a Department of Defense-imposed total restriction on photography in the vicinity of the recovery operations. http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2001/09/18/2/?nc=1 } The image was not critical but the clamp down on photographing the area explains why critical steps in the event itself and the aftermath do not provide a clearer accounting of the investigation and actions around the damaged areas. http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/21_APwindsdown.html  And it didn't help that every news source had a different take on what happened. So naturally people believe what they are told. There is a site with the names of the people who died at the Pentagon: http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-472122-victims.php  and I am sure out of respect for the dead many would rather move on then stir up more trouble. But the sad fact is that if the truth is not being addressed then those who died are not being honored by our refusal to act on our better conscience. Go through the images in such a way that they can be seen side by side...it helps to clear up the confusion. Then ask yourself why did they lie about something like this? The motive for this crime must be something quite rotten to behold. But that is why they blamed it on the Talibin.
MORE
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/77comment4.html
 
===============

URGENT: 911 Cartel Infighting Info
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/carteninftx.htm