Lagasse, WilliamThe Statements of Sgt. William LagasseTue Jun 24 20:16:58 2003208.152.73.64GO TO LAST STATEMENT REPLY TO DICK EASTMAN.....The Statements of Sgt. William Lagasse Subject: 9-11Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:11:40 -0400From: "Lagasse, William, , PFPA" To: "'apfn@apfn.org '" Dear Sir rest assured it was a Boeing 757 that flew into the building thatday, I was on duty as a pentagon police sgt. I was refueling my vehicle atthe barraks k gas station that day adjacent to the aircrafts flight path.It was close enough that i could see the windows had the shades pulled down,it struck several light poles next to rt 27 and struck a trailer used tostore construction equipment for the renovation of the pentagon that was tothe right of the fueselage impact point. The fact that you are insinuatingthat this was staged and a fraud is unbelievable. You ask were the debrisis...well it was in the building..I saw it everywhere. I swear to god youpeople piss me off to no end. I invite you and you come down and I will walkyou through it step by step. I have more than a few hours in generalaviation aircraft and can identify commercial airliners. Have you ever seenphotos of other aircraft accident photos...there usually isnt huge amountsof debris left...how much did you see from the WTC?...are those fakeaircraft flying into the building. I know that this will make no diffrenceto you because to even have a websight like this you are obviously adiffrent sort of thinker. To: Sgt. WIlliam LagasseFrom: Dick EastmanDear Sgt. Lagasse,Ken Varden considers you letter important enough to forward to several people interested in what REALLY happened.Your statement indicates that you are a very good witnesses who knows planes and knows who what to look for.Before passing on your letter to others who can't make up their minds what to believe, could you describe further all that you witnessed.Is Barraks K in Fort Meyer, west of the crash, or is it attached to the Pentagon itself? Where did the plane come in, in relation to the Naval Annex and the Columbia Pike?Were you able to see what part of the Boeing hit the lamp posts and at what height the posts were "clipped"? (Or did you notice the downed poles afterwards?) Where were you standing in relation to the crash point, the helipad, the trailor that was hit?How far from the crash? I'd like to locate you on the map.Several people saw the shades pulled down -- were you looking at the port (left) or starboard side?Did you notice the plane tilt its wings or bank in its final flight? Did you see the trailer being struck or is this based on your later observation of the damage? How did the plane descend as it approached the Pentagon at the bottom of the hill?You saw the debis everywhere in the building. Were you in the building or did you look in through the hole made in the crash before the wall collapsed?Or did you go inside and look around at a later day?What specific parts of the Boeing (passenger chairs, fuselage, aluminum frame etc.) did you see? What debris did you see that you recognized as coming from a commercial airliner?You saw the Boeing go by. Did you see the actual explosion? If so, can you describe how the plane went in.I will pass on the letter you have already sent to places where this topic is being heatedly argued and where the majority of people have not yet made up their minds.I must admit that I am heavily influenced by pictures of the hole and the video camera evidence -- but I cannot say I am 100 percent certain what happened.I hope you give me the benefit of the doubt that I will not dismiss your observations out of hand. If I am mistaken, please believe it is an honest mistake and remember, I have never heard your story.Sincerely,Dick EastmanYakima From: Lagasse, William, , PFPATo: Dick Eastman Mr. Eastman The barracks k gas station is were the press set up after theattack, approx 500-600m west-south west of the pentagon. The aircraftstruck the poles in question, they were not blown down, the aircraft passedalmost directly over the naval annex splitting the distance between the ANCand Columbia pike. and was approx 100-150ft agl when it passed over theannex and continued on a shallow-fast decent and literally hit the buildingwere it met the ground. There was no steep bank, but a shallow bank with aheavy uncoordinated left rudder turn causing a severe yaw into the buildingwith the starboard side of the cockpit actually hitting at about the sametime the wing was involved with the trailer, Because of the Doppler effectno one could have heard the plane if they were on rt 27 until it was alreadyin the building, identifying its position and trajectory from that anglewould have been difficult if not impossible...it was not over ArlingtonNational Cemetery but closer to Columbia pike itself, there is a small groveof trees that would have shielded anyone on 27 from seeing the aircraftuntil it was literally on top of them...again not much time to make theassessment. I identified it as American Airlines almost as soon as I sawit and radioed that it had struck the building. I was on the Starboard sideof the aircraft. There was very little wake turbulence that I can recall,which was surprising to me. The aircraft DID NOT have its landing gear orflaps extended. whoever said the landing gear comes out when its that lowforgets the aircraft was exceeding the speed that would allow gear to beextended. How and where the trailer was struck I cant speak of because rt 27blocked my view slightly to the right because it is elevated. I did howeversee it in person BEFORE any EMS/Fire arrived and it was fully engulfed inflame 30-40 seconds after impact literally torn in half. you can see in afew AP photos a tower workers 300zx on the left side of the impact pointthat was struck adjacent to the fire truck that was hit. 3 fireman werethere at the tower as well as two persons in the tower that watched thisentire process and are luck to be alive. There was almost no debris to theright/south of the impact point but I found a compressor blade and carbonfiber pieces over 3/4 of a mile away to the north on 27 when we werecollecting evidence. The biggest piece of debris I saw was one of theengines smashed...but intact in the building. I saw the building from theinside and outside..before during and after the collapse and rest assuredthat it was indeed an American airlines 757 that struck the Pentagon thatmorning. no photos clearly show the size of the original breech...it was atleast 10-12 feet high and 20-30 feet wide not than size persons who weren'tthere claim. I don't know what else I can say to convince you. I hope yoursearch for the truth will end with this e-mail as I have nothing to gain bylying or distorting facts.. I live with what I saw everyday of my life, Ithas taken a long time to deal with the images, screams and anger I feltthat day, to be honest your website angered me to the point I wanted to justcurse and rant and rave but I decided this would be much more helpful inquelling misconceptions 911 HIGH TREASON!! Beaver Cole, Tue Jun 24 20:28 What about the 28 witnesses never seen again? CIA Mind Control Victim, Tue Jun 24 21:40 Such as? Ron Harvey, Wed Jun 25 10:33 Re: Such as? William Lagasse, Wed Jun 25 17:18 Such as? Ron Harvey., Wed Jun 25 20:04 RE: Your letters posted and being discussed. Dennis Stewart, Wed Jun 25 13:36 42,000 Google indices for Impeaching Bush Bush/CIA Mind Control Victim, Wed Jun 25 12:25 What about the Demacrat Liberals??? Vincent Germano, Thu Jun 26 15:15 FBI mole spied for free trips, court told An FBI informant, Tue Jun 24 22:51
Main Page - Friday, 06/27/03
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES