Alfred Lilienthal
Greater Israel -- What Does It Really Mean?
Mon Apr 14 02:38:41 2003
24.207.55.153




http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/greaterisrael.htm

Greater Israel -- What Does It Really Mean?
2003





The U.S. led war on Iraq... and eventually many other Muslim nations may be part of an Israeli plan to let others die for the goal of its expansion into Greater Israel. Extremist Zionist sympathizers in Bush's administration are the perpetrators of this scheme to have American military men and women die for Israel. See the arguments below for this claim.


Are Arabs and other Muslims really "crazy"
to believe that the War on Iraq may be part of
an Israeli and American "Zionist" plot to
dominate the entire Middle East?



WAR TO CREATE "GREATER ISRAEL"

Bin Laden said an attack on Iraq would be followed by U.S. "aggressions" against more Arab countries such as Egypt, Sudan, Iran and Syria for the benefit of its ally Israel.

"This attack on Iraq is part of a new crusade to prepare the region, after dividing it, for the creation of a Greater Israel. This means the whole region will be ruled by Jews," he said.

-----

The man behind the Bush Zionists in U.S. --
Sharansky in Israel
(who tells Cheney and Wolfowitz what to tell Bush to say)

Date: Fri Jul 5, 2002 10:53 am
Subject: Coincidence? Parts of Bush speech match Sharansky proposal

Washington Post
July 2, 2002
A Sound Bite So Good, the President Wishes He Had Said It
By Dana Milbank

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11253-2002Jul1.html

[excerpt of article follows]

Is Natan Sharansky working in the White House speechwriting office?

Sharansky, Israel's housing minister and deputy prime minister, is the former Soviet dissident and head of a right-wing Russian-immigrant party. But by coincidence -- or something more -- the Israeli-Palestinian peace plan Sharansky published in the Jerusalem Post on May 3 sounds a lot like the peace proposal Bush delivered in the Rose Garden on June 24.

"The time has come for new leadership" for the Palestinians, Sharansky wrote. "The Palestinians must be encouraged to form an open and free society that is not burdened by the fear, hatred, and terror that have been sown in recent years by Arafat and his leadership."

Here's Bush's version: "Peace requires a new and different Palestinian leadership so that a Palestinian state can be born. I call on the Palestinian people to elect new leaders, leaders not compromised by terror."

Sharansky wrote that his seven-point plan "cannot happen overnight" and called for a "three-year transition period."

Bush, in turn, said a final agreement "could be reached within three years from now."

Sharansky envisioned an "international coordinating body" headed by the United States that could, with a Palestinian Administrative Authority, "develop the infrastructure for democratic life among the Palestinians." There would also be an "international economic fund" for industry and infrastructure.

And Bush? "I've asked Secretary Powell to work intensively with Middle Eastern and international leaders to realize the vision of a Palestinian state, focusing them on a comprehensive plan to support Palestinian reform and institution building." The president said the United States would work with the World Bank and international donors on "a major project of economic reform and development."

Finally, Sharansky argued that only a "free and open" society "can serve as a solid guarantee for normal relations between the two peoples." For this reason, "we owe it to ourselves and to our future to help the Palestinians help themselves."

Bush, seven weeks later, submitted that "a stable, peaceful Palestinian state is necessary to achieve the security that Israel longs for." Israel should "take concrete steps to support the emergence of a viable, credible Palestinian state," he added.

The Sharansky and Bush plans are not entirely the same; notably absent from Sharansky's version was Bush's call for Israel to freeze its settlements in Palestinian territory. Still, Sharansky themes began to tumble from the lips of Bush officials.

Speechwriting director Michael Gerson did not return a phone call asking about the coincidence.


Profile OF Anatoly (Natan) Sharansky
Israel's great dissembler
http://www.redress.btinternet.co.uk/sharansky.htm





In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates."

Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: "The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon."

NOTE: Sometimes the term Nile to the Euphrates is used, whereas the Brook of Egypt may be another lesser waterway about 100 miles East of the Nile. Either way, it adds up to the confiscation of a huge amount of Arab territory.


Greater Israel Map In Hebrew



Does this image make it clear enough
that what the Arabs and other Muslims have claimed,
about schemes for Israeli expansionism, is actually
a valid concern and not baseless craziness?

http://geocities.com/operationshekhinah2/two.html



Liberating America From Israel
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/liberating_america_from_isrel.htm


Greater Israel "LINKS":
All the references on this web page
and many other articles we recommend.


http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/greaterisrael_links.htm

• Who runs Bush & the USA? — Frank McLean, Mon Apr 14 03:01
• USS Cole suspects escape — APFN, Mon Apr 14 04:18
• The Jewish Internet Association — LibertyThink, Mon Apr 14 03:34
• Israel's Proxy Wars — M. Shahid Alam, Mon Apr 14 15:01