Why We Are Picketing This Federal Court Building
Friday, 23-Feb-01 22:51:07
24.14.28.77 writes:
Why We Are Picketing This Federal Court Building
Printed notice handed out by Vincent and Sophie Germano while picketing the U.S. Court in Houston, Texas, beginning Feb. 21, 2001 protesting abuse of power and violation of civil rights by Judges who are sworn to defend our Constitution and Bill of Rights
"The people are the rightful masters of both congresses and courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it". Abraham Lincoln
Since the Constitution of the United States of America is the Supreme Law of the Land and superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, including Congress, any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void - Marbury v. Madison, 5 (Cranch) U.S. 137, 174, 176. Constitutional rights must be interpreted in favor of citizens-Byars v. U.S., 273 U.S. 28.
As the result of the outrageous, indefensible corrupt conduct in the courts in Oklahoma as shown in case history page attached hereto, we filed a civil Rico
suit in this Federal Court-docketed a civil rights case. The Bank is named defendant and our prior lawyers co-conspirators. The suit demands a trial by jury to set aside a series of fraudulent judgments and seeks compensation for
the seizure of our American Inn property representing all that we worked a life time for. The corrupt legal actions drove us out of a life long business and our only source of income.
As in each of our prior failed efforts for a trial by jury, the Bank moved for summary dismissal of our law suit. A Judge in this building also abused his discretionary powers, settled law and ignored the true facts and displayed his bias against these pro se Germanos to strike our suit. This Judge based his decision on the Bank's feloniously perjured affidavit, motion, brief and court orders - shown to have been obtained by "intrinsic" fraud by court records and two affidavits filed in support of our complaint and in opposition to appellees motion for summary judgment.
We appealed the judgment of this court's Judge to the U. S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Upon review of Appellees' opening brief, we filed a "motion to supplement the record containing 42 exhibits that are vital to defending our appeal against appellees' slanderous attacks upon our integrity and to expose
their assertions of fact and case law as fraudulent, and grounds for remand for a trial by jury denied us since summoned as defendants in the Bank's feloniously perjured foreclosure in 1985.
THE DECISION TO PUBLICIZE OUR STORY AND PICKET THIS COURT, however, stems from the likely defeat of our appeal as indicated by the deceptive orders by the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, that are not listed on the Case Docket. The clerk corruptly deprived us of "en banc" reconsideration of a single Judge's denial of our motion to supplement the record in accord with the court's prior decisions, and refused to file our motions complaining of the Clerk's wrongdoing and Appellee's attorneys' violation of ABA'S Model Rules of Professional Responsibility. Leave to supplement the record with the appellees'and our attorneys' paper trail of corrupt conduct, fraud upon the court that is beyond comprehension would compel an independent Judge to remand our case for a trial by jury denied us since 1985.
Vincent and Sophie Germano
Case History
CASE HISTORY OF CORRUPT CONDUCT AND FELONIOUSLY PERJURED INSTRUMENTS ON WHICH JUDGES OF STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS IN OKLAHOMA LEVIED SUMMARY JUDGMENTS AGAINST US
In 1981, together with our life savings and a loan secured by a mortgage & personal guarantees by The First Bethany National Bank, Bethany Oklahoma, now First Bethany Bank and Trust, (Bank), we constructed the American Inn located at Interstate-40, Oklahoma City, OK. On January 4, 1985, without default or notice the Bank filed a lawsuit in foreclosure. What happened to us from that date to this day must be publicized as a warning to all Americans.
We sought legal services of lawyers of nine (9) Oklahoma City law firms, who instead, corruptly conspired with Bank's insider-lawyer in awarding Bank judicial foreclosure and dismiss our counterclaims - based on feloniously perjured statements that another lender's commitment to pay-off Bank's Note & mortgage, obtained for a $19, 500.00 consideration, "had expired."
Seeking protection under CH-11 Bankruptcy, we helplessly witnessed two corrupt Trustees join the bankers & lawyers in taking full, fraudulent control of American Inn's proceeding in which they criminally prosecuted a fraudulent adversary suit against us; finalized the foreclosure and defeated our appeal from their pre-petition fraud and American Inn's reorganization under Title 11, U.S.C. in such cases.
Our attempts to obtain justice were again thwarted by the corrupt Trustees' who filed false affidavits in support of the bankers and lawyers who corruptly moved federal and state district courts for summary judgment[s]-dismissing our Federal lawsuit against the Bank and our Cross Petition in the Bank’s lawsuit against us and defeated appeals of the open court crimes.
We sought relief in the U.S. Supreme Court only to have it's Clerk ignore the court's prior decisions to deny our pro se plea for relief because it arrived one day out-of -time! As a result of the extortionate lending and corrupt legal actions, the Comptroller of the Currency obtained a foreign judgment against us in the Harris County ,TX, District Court. After filing our federal suit in Houston TX, the Federal Agency assigned the judgment to a third party in 1999.
Thus, having been defrauded of our assets without a trial by jury by the corrupt conduct of our prior attorney[s], ethical representation has been denied us to this day. Exhibit (b) lists the names and addresses of 94 of over 200 lawyers contacted since 1985, who have declined our cause on a contingency fee basis.
See our Web site showing our lawyers incredulous violation of trust as they conspired with Bank's insider-lawyer Peter Pierce's felonious legal actions in moving the courts in Oklahoma for a total of seven (7) summary judgments.
Vincent and Sophie Germano ==============================================================
Many
|