Stephen P. Pizzo
http://www.stephen.pizzo.com
Email me at: stephen(at)pizzo.com
NEWS FOR REAL
http://newsforreal.com/
Basta!
Enough. Enough, enough, enough! Enough with the spin and
re-spin. Enough with slandering those who question this
abortion of a war. And enough with the war itself. The
time to put a stop to this madness was long ago. But we
didn't. Instead we allowed a clutch of half-mad
fundamentalists unleash a bloody, unless, un-winnable
war that's killed maybe hundreds of thousands. A war
that has become an insatiable black hole that sucks in
more lives every day.
Now the President, and his shrinking circle of fellow
travelers, want to send up to 35,000 additional US
troops into that black hole. He will also ask Congress
for a couple of hundred billion more dollars (we don't
have) to pay for two more years of war.
Enough! We should have said enough, meant it, and forced
it long ago. But today is all we have, and today is a
far better day than tomorrow, to say it, “enough
already!”
To Democrats, like Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid, I
say, get with it or get the hell out of the way. You've
hidden behind your triangulated, mealy-mouthed,
obfuscated, do-nothing, take-no-risks, non-positions for
too long. And, to our shame, we have allowed you to get
away with it. Enough of that too.
The time has come for Democrats to do something for
change, to stand for something, for a change. We are
onto your dodge, you excuses, which can be summarized
something like this:
“Sure I voted to give the President permission to attack
Iraq. But I did so only to give him negotiating power. I
didn't think he would really do it. And I sure didn't
vote for the kind of incompetence we've seen in
conducting the war.”
Oh, how tidy. How minced. How nauseatingly weaselly.
That vote was four years ago. Where the hell have you
been since? That vote was 2951 dead US GI's ago. Since
Democrats and Republicans in congress has voted over
$350 billion in funding to facilitate that deadly
incompetence. So shut up with that crap, Hillary. You
and Democrats like you, have your own penance to do,
your own crow to choke down, your own shame to shoulder.
And the best way to begin is to learn how to say,
“enough!”
That's what voters said in November, “enough!” Our vote
putting Democrats back in control of Congress, was not a
vote for anything. It was a vote against this war. It
was not a vote for “Hillary for President,” it was a
vote against the current occupant of that office.
The time has come for those of you elected to congress
last November to act. The day you raise your hands and
are sworn into office this January the very first thing
you must do – Nancy Pelosi – is to say "enough!" You
need to stop this war, stop it dead in its bloody
tracks. And, no, Nancy, that can't wait 100 hours until
you raise in the minimum wage. In fact, we can wait for
every item on your first 100 hours to-do list, Ms.
Pelosi. What we can't wait one day longer for is for
congress to say, “enough” to this war. No more
continuing resolutions. No additional funds for a
“surge” of troops to Iraq. Enough! The only money the
administration should get for Iraq is just enough to pay
for a safe and orderly extraction of US troops out of
Mad Max Iraq.
Below is a chart every member of congress should have
stapled to their forehead until they get it. It shows
that, when it comes to fighting an indigenous
insurgency, sending more troops is simply feeding the
beast. As you can see in January 1965 Lyndon Johnson was
at precisely the same juncture as George W. Bush finds
himself today. The US had 180,000 troops fighting
Communist Viet Cong insurgents in Vietnam, and we were
losing. Johnson's choices, like Bush's now, were
limited; withdraw or add troops. To Johnson, Texan like
Bush, withdrawal meant defeat and he was not about to
stand for that on his watch. So he added troops – a lot
of troops – another 360,000 troops. (See chart below.)
We all know how that turned out. Still, even to this
day, die-hard right-wingers will tell you that we didn't
lose that war, but forfeited it. That politicians in
Washington “tied the hands of our military.”
Excuse me. Tied whose hands? We had B-52's carpet
bombing North Vietnam, air tankers defoliating thousands
of square miles of rain forest, free-fire zones in which
anything that moved, man, woman, child or water buffalo,
was shot dead, entire villages were napalmed. I'd hate
to see what those right-wingers consider “unhindered”
warfare.
I only mention that because that's what we will hear
from those now in favor of sending more troops to Iraq.
They will argue that we have not fought in Iraq as
though it was a real war, and that's precisely what we
must do now. And, that if we do send more troops, we can
still “succeed.”
Hello. Earth to morons. Vietnam is a smaller country
than Iraq -- 325,360 sq km compared to Iraq's 432,162 sq
km. We poured over half a million troops into that
smaller country -- far more troops than we could muster
today -- and we still couldn't gain the upper hand over
those insurgents. Nevertheless we are about to be asked
by this an administration -- an administration with a
unbroken record of failure -- to give them one more
crack at it. They want us to accept the unlikely premise
that, if we just let them increase US troop strength in
Iraq to something around 165,000, we could still
“succeed.”
READ THE FULL REPORT:
http://newsforreal.com/
-----------------------------------------
Bush's Secret Plan
For Iraq
As everyone in the Bush Administration seems to be
writing and leaking their own CYA memos, one has to
wonder what George W. Bush and Karl Rove are thinking.
Well, News For Real has gotten our fictional hands on a
memo George wrote to Karl just last week. In it Bush
voices some disappointment with his long-time partner,
indicates that frin here on he's calling the shoots, and
reveals his secret plan for dealing with the meltdown in
Iraq.
Memo
CLICK:
http://newsforreal.blogspot.com/