EXCLUSIVE: White House Forbids Publication Of
Op-Ed On Iran By Former Bush Official

SOURCE:
Middle East analyst Flynt Leverett, who served
under President Bush on the National Security
Council and is now a fellow at the New America
Foundation, revealed today that the White House
has been blocking the publication of an op-ed he
wrote for the New York Times. The column is
critical of the administration’s refusal to
engage Iran.
Leverett’s op-ed has already been cleared by the
CIA, where he was a senior analyst. Leverett
explained, “I’ve been doing this for three and a
half years since leaving government, and I’ve
never had to go to the White House to get
clearance for something that I was publishing as
long as the CIA said, ‘Yeah, you’re not putting
classified information.’”
According to Leverett the op-ed was “all based
on stuff that Secretary Powell, Secretary Rice,
Deputy Secretary Armitage have talked about
publicly. It’s been extensively reported in the
media.” Leverett says the incident shows “just
how low people like Elliot Abrams at the NSC
[National Security Council] will stoop to try
and limit the dissemination of arguments
critical of the administration’s policy.”
Listen to Leverett’s remarks at a panel today at
the Center for American Progress:
CLICK HERE FOR AUDIO
Transcript:
Thanks. I think I was able to put out some of my
basic ideas on how we need to be engaging Iran
diplomatically. They’re, you know, expounded on
in greater length on paper. I wanted to say
something briefly about the administration, and
where it is.
I have been extremely pessimistic that this
administration is inclined or capable of
genuinely rethinking its approach to Iran in the
way that we need it to at this point, and I’ve
had an unfortunate experience this week that has
only confirmed that for me. As I do with all of
my publications, the Century Foundation paper, I
showed to the CIA, for whom I used to work, to
verify that I was not revealing classified
information. They did so, as they have with 30
other things that I’ve published since leaving
government. Didn’t ask to change a word.
I prepared an op-ed for the New York Times off
of this paper, which is ready to go, ready for
publication. The CIA says that as far as they’re
concerned, there’s not any classified
information in it. But the White House has
intervened, claiming that there is classified
information in the op-ed, even though it’s
already been cleared. It’s all published. It’s
all based on stuff that Secretary Powell,
Secretary Rice, Deputy Secretary Armitage have
talked about publicly. It’s been extensively
reported in the media. But the White House is
saying I can’t publish an op-ed in the New York
Times that lays out the argument. I’ve been
doing this for three and a half years since
leaving government, and I’ve never had to go to
the White House to get clearance for something
that I was publishing as long as the CIA said,
‘Yeah, you’re not putting classified
information.’
Why this week — after the Baker study group,
when pressure is on them to rethink their
position on Iran — why do they not want this
op-ed, based on my experiences in government, my
experience dealing with Iran, with Iranian
officials, after I left government? Why do they
not want this op-ed going in the New York Times
this week? I think it says something, and I
think it says something about just how low
people like Elliot Abrams at the NSC [National
Security Council] will stoop to try and limit
the dissemination of arguments critical of the
administration’s policy.