torell

Flight 77 is the proof of conspiracy

Thu Dec 12 16:53:51 2002
204.189.23.7

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Flight 77 is the proof of conspiracy
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:31:43 -0600
From: torell torell7@netscape.net
To: apfn@apfn.org

I wanted to pass on something that includes links you have doubtless
seen, but the piece gives specific reasons for specific oddities. More
important, it suggests a course of action.
....................

This is the prologue. At these two links you find why reasonable
people can believe that a 757 did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Don't
be put off by the humorous approach..
http://www.koolpages.com/killtown/pentalawn2000.html

http://www.koolpages.com/killtown/pentanium.html

Here is a story that fits the facts.

An element of the Bush administration staged a terrorist attack on US
soil to rally Americans to an otherwise unacceptable plan of invading
Afghanistan. The hijackers were either trained terrorists or
wannabes. They were conspicuously Middle Eastern, which was essential
to focus Americans' aggression on the Middle East. In the days
immediately following 9/11, Bush mentioned Iraq as well as Afghanistan
as a target for reprisal.

The hijackers were tasked with the destruction of the WTC and targets
in Washington. In view of their background, it would have been crazy
to trust them to restrict themselves to those targets. In the
terrorists' circle, the Sears Towers, the World Bank, the Canadian
parliament building and the Royal Bank had all been considered for
attack, so an armed fighter was assigned to baby-sit discreetly each
commandeered airliner to make certain the hijackers did not expand
their mission.

The presence of the baby-sitters made it imperative to suppress normal
interceptor response. Interceptor response means that military
aircraft intercept any plane that is hijacked, off its route, or out
of communication. The military aircraft are deployed as soon as the
problem occurs. When they are within close visual range of the plane
in distress, they track along with it to keep the air traffic control
system aware of its location. This occurred about 60 times during the
year before 9/11.

Since each of the hijacked aircraft had had its own fighter escort
whose mission was to prevent any but the desired attacks, the normal
function of interception would pose three dangers to the operation. 1)
The intercepting pilots might see the fighters and recognize them for
what they were. 2)The baby-sitting fighter might shoot down an
interceptor though the target was the hijacked aircraft. 3)An
interceptor pilot might witness the shootdown of a hijacked airliner.

Any of these three actions would endanger the scenario of a surprise
terrorist attack on the US. Accordingly, there was a historic
quadruple 'failure' of interception on 9/11.

The Pentagon was the intended target of Flight 77. However, it was
realized too late that the hijacker who would be flying the 757 did not
have the skill necessary for the high speed turning descent and precise
strike. The solution was elegant.

The hijacking pilot was ordered to take control of the plane, turn off
the transponder, descend below radar, and fly the plane several miles
out over the Atlantic, turn approximately 180 degrees, do the easier,
straight in approach and kamikaze a land target, the White House or the
Pentagon. The pilot flew east below radar but the passage of the
airliner at low altitude and high speed was not noticed since nearly
everyone was indoors watching television.

A missile or drone was launched so it struck the Pentagon when Flight 77
would have hit if the hijacker had been capable of the maneuver involved.

When Flight 77 was far enough from the coast that identifiable debris
would not wash ashore, it was shot down. You may recall that private
flying was not permitted in the days immediately following 9/11. This
prevented unauthorized observation of the of the oil slick or floating
debris.

The debris field and oil slick of Flight 77 might have been captured by
both US and non-US satellite imaging. Only non-US imaging would be
available to locate wreckage of the 757 on the ocean floor, since the US
government is unlikely to cooperate in exposing the deception. However,
other countries that are alarmed by US aggression, may find it in their
interest to retrieve physical evidence that Flight 77 could not have
struck the Pentagon. Retrieving Flight 77 debris from the ocean floor
will make it clear 9/11 was crime, not terror. The states' prosecution
of the murder cases will open the conspiracy more effectively than
Congressional investigation.

Regardless of whether the satellite imaging comes through, we should
start the side scanning sonar over a grid off Delaware and New Jersey.
Side scanning sonar was used to find JFK, Jr.'s plane, and later, his
father's PT boat. Flight 77 is there to be found. It is the evidence
that will put Bush, Rumsfeld and Myers, at least, in prison for the
rest of their lives. Why those three? They are the few people in the
world who could supress interceptor response.

notes:
About interceptors:
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/11_20_01_911murder_sect2.html

The hijackers who flew into the WTC had a much easier flying assignment
than the hijacker who was to crash the Pentagon.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1542204.stm

Flying 300 mph less than 10 feet above the ground would be very
difficult even for a skilled pilot.
http://www.koolpages.com/killtown/flight77/hijackers.html

You can't trust people who are willing to hijack airliners and crash
them into the WTC and the Pentagon. If the administration was
complicit in 9/11, there had to be babysitters. Babysitters are also
an explanation as to why the interceptor response was inhibited. Here
other targets are mentioned.
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/01_25_02_revised_012802_vreeland.html 
=================================================================

Flight 77 - Pentagon questions
Nothing on this timeline makes sense
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm

WTC: STRANGER THAN FICTION
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm

WTC-911 - THE BASIC QUESTIONS
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_questions.htm

Senator Says Sept. 11 Report Too Soft on CIA, FBI
A leader of the Senate intelligence committee criticized on Tuesday a congressional inquiry into Sept. 11-related intelligence failures
as too soft on US agencies, especially the CIA.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=1880812

For $2.00 get a full report on 9/11
Mail:
George
P.O. Box 5772
Austin, Texas 78763

George was interviewed on Alex Jones show today 12/12/02,
it the best info I have heard. //klv
http://www.infowars.com/

• Re: Flight 77 is the proof of conspiracy — torell, Fri Dec 13 00:02
• DAN HOPSICKER EXPOSING CIA/HEROIN 911 CONNECTION!!! — Brian Downing Quig, Fri Dec 13 00:11