Norman Solomon
"The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media."
Fri Dec 13 18:23:03 2002
208.152.73.54

Decoding Some Top Buzz Words of 2002
By Norman Solomon
Dec 13, 2002

How words are used can be crucial to understanding and misunderstanding
the world around us. The media lexicon is saturated with certain buzz
phrases. They're popular -- but what do they mean?

"The use of words is to express ideas," James Madison wrote.
"Perspicuity, therefore, requires not only that the ideas should be
distinctly formed, but that they should be expressed by words distinctly
and exclusively appropriate to them." More than two centuries later,
surveying the wreckage of public language in political spheres, you might
be tempted to murmur: "Dream on, Jim."

With 2002 nearing its end in the midst of great international tension,
here's a sampling of some top U.S. media jargon:

"Pre-emptive"
This adjective represents a kind of inversion of the Golden Rule: "Do
violence onto others just in case they might otherwise do violence onto
you." Brandished by Uncle Sam, we're led to believe that's a noble
concept.

"Weapons of mass destruction"
They're bad unless they're good. Globally, the U.S. government leads the
way with thousands of unfathomably apocalyptic nuclear weapons. (Cue the
media cheers.) Regionally, in the Middle East, only Israel has a nuclear
arsenal -- estimated at 200 atomic warheads -- currently under the
control of Ariel Sharon, who has proven to be lethally out of control on
a number of occasions. (Cue the media shrugs.) Meanwhile, the possibility
that Saddam Hussein might someday develop any such weapons is deemed to
be sufficient reason to launch a war. (Cue the Pentagon missiles.)

"International community"
Honorary members include any and all nations that are allied with
Washington or accede to its policies. Other governments are evil rogue
states.

"International law"
This is the political equivalent of Play Dough, to be shaped, twisted and
kneaded as needed. No concept is too outlandish, no rationalization too
Orwellian when a powerful government combines with pliant news media. Few
members of the national press corps are willing to question the basics
when the man in the Oval Office issues the latest pronouncement about
international behavior. It's a cinch that fierce condemnation would
descend on any contrary power that chooses to do as we do and not as we
say.

"Terrorism"
The hands-down winner of the rhetorical sweepstakes for 2002, this word
aptly condemns as reprehensible the killing of civilians, but the word is
applied quite selectively rather than evenhandedly. When the day comes
that news outlets accord the life of a Palestinian child the same
reverence as the life of an Israeli child, we'll know that media coverage
has moved beyond craven mediaspeak to a single standard of human rights.

Although you wouldn't know it from U.S. media coverage, 80 percent of the
Palestinians killed in recent months by the Israeli Defense Force during
curfew enforcement were children, according to an October report from the
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem. Twelve people under the age of 16
had been killed, with dozens more wounded by Israeli gunfire in occupied
areas, during a period of four months. "None of those killed endangered
the lives of soldiers," B'Tselem said.

Closer to home, in less dramatic ways, the concept of "human rights"
melts away when convenient. Even an assiduous reader of the U.S. press
would be surprised to run across some key provisions of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations more than 50
years ago and theoretically in force today. For instance, the document
declares without equivocation that "everyone has the right to work, to
free choice of employment, to just and favorable conditions of work and
to protection against unemployment."

Perhaps the Universal Declaration passage least likely to succeed with
U.S. news media appears in Article 25: "Everyone has the right to a
standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and
of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and the
necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of
unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of
livelihood in circumstances beyond his control."

Words expressing those kinds of ideas are scarce in our media lexicon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Solomon's latest book is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media."
Written by Norman Solomon of Fair.Org--Posted 12/13/2002
========================================================
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing
that ever has." -Margaret Mead -