RCVD FM: UN-MONITORED ACCOUNT
THE OKC BOMBING - FOUR YEARS BEFORE THE EXPLOSION
Sun Dec 10, 2006 19:22
 

*** DO NOT REPLY AS THIS EMAIL IS BEING SENT TO YOU FROM AN
UN-MONITORED ACCOUNT. *** Received by APFN 06/17/01 ; 7:22 PM
The other 20, or perhaps thirty, or perhaps 40 or more people
who should of been lying next to Tim McVeigh on that gurney.
I believe it is well past time these questions be answered.

THE OKC BOMBING - FOUR YEARS BEFORE THE EXPLOSION
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mcveigh_patsy.htm
----------------------------------------------------------

The bombing of the Murrah Building was over six years ago.....The
Government's chosen Patsy has recently been executed. So, the chapter
is finished and the (manuscript) closed - correct? Hardly.......
Governor Frank Keating's brother, Martin Keating, wrote a manuscript in
1991, roughly four years before the OKC bombing. Gov. Frank Keating is a
former FBI hot shot. His brother, Martin could not get this work published
until AFTER the bombing. This manuscript, now a published book, is titled
The Final Jihad. In this book, Keating lays out a story of terrorists,
based in OKC, who decide to bomb a Federal building. And the name of one
of the key "terrorists" in the book is? Tom McVey. Tom who? And for the
gist of this fictional work: The terrorists in The Final Jihad are
stopped by an Oklahoma highway patrolman for a broken tail light. So, this
is just coincidental, right? If so, the Sun no longer "comes up in the
East", and I've this great bridge to sell you, located in the middle
of the Florida Everglades, I believe.

Now, let me see: We have a book in manuscript form written FOUR years
before the OKC bombing whose story line involves terrorists in Oklahoma
City. This part of this fictional work comes true, which if you have
followed Hollywood, or certain works of published "Fiction", such as
this works, you know that "they" frequently release the details of their
agenda if not entire pieces of the mosaic for public consumption. And it
is ALWAYS couched as "fiction". It is not...............
We have a main character in the book by the name of Tom McVey. In real
life, the bomber four years later in OKC is named Tim McVeigh.
We have the terrorists in this fictional work stopped by Oklahoma state
troopers for a broken tail light. In real life, our bomber, Tim McVeigh,
is pulled over by an Oklahoma state trooper because of a missing license
plate.

How's that for fiction being stranger than reality? In this book,
remember, it's written in 1991, our author also predicts the TWA downing
and the World Trade Center bombing. Was this just a premonition that Mr.
Keating had? I hardly think so. It simply proves, yet one more time, that
everyone of these violent events are carefully planned out several years
in advance, then orchestrated. What this book does sound like is blue
print for the bombing.
What is Mr. Martin Keating's background? In his own words:
http://www.firstkeating.com/author.htm

"Martin Keating is a master storyteller with unique access to government
intelligence agencies and clandestine terrorist groups. His brother Frank
Keating, currently governor of Oklahoma, is a former FBI agent and
assistant secretary of the Treasury who supervised the Secret Service, U.S.
Customs, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. Keating's
uncle, Barney Martin was a career intelligence officer who headed the U.S.
Navy's worldwide foreign intelligence collection operations and
counterintelligence activities.
Introduced to the intelligence community through generations of family
involvement, Martin Keating knows intimate details of what the rest of us
can only imagine. Armed with firsthand knowledge of explosives and of
chemical and biological weapons, Keating accurately reveals what the
highest government officials have known, feared, and covered up for much
too long."

Martin Keating also bragged after the bombing that he had copies of the
surveillance film from the Southwest Bell building across the street from
the Murrah building. The film from the Regency Towers survived completely
intact. The government claims the Southwest Bell film didn't - my money
says they're lying and they're lying to protect their assets and their
invented story (and their asses). There wasn't a scintilla of this story
in any (mainstream) media publication(s) except Media Bypass Magazine.
You would think the "mainstream media" would have jumped on this like a
June-bug just because of who the author of the manuscript is: Brother of
the Governor of the State of Oklahoma. Nope. Dead silence. Still think
the mainstream press, the media is uncompromised, uncorrupted? Think again.
They haven't done their job, for the most part, for 30 years now. One of
the primary thrusts of the "Agenda" was to gain control of the media, for
after all, he who controls the media controls the power. For the most
part, they've succeeded. For now.

Has anyone ever put Martin Keating under oath and ask him to produce
these video surveillance films? No. Why not? Because the truth will destroy,
or ar least could potentially destroy the likes of George Bush Sr., who
ultimately ordered the bombing, the Clinton's, several Rockefeller's,
the directors of the FBI, ATF, CIA, DOD NSA, NSC, NATO and so on.
There is talk that Frank Keating - who states emphatically on the live
news coverage the morning of the bombing that more bombs were found and "have
been removed from the building" (a statement he now denies, but is
memorialized on film) - may be slated to replace Louis Freeh. Oh, good,
that makes me feel real warm and fuzzy.

I just thought I'd bring up this little bit of history that has such a
strange resemblance to what happened in OKC.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23037
This pretty much says what the rest of us are saying: There are so many
unanswered questions and McVeigh is evidence. Why is our good Christian,
John Ashcroft trying to hurry up with this execution? Is it to expedite
the process of exposing the likes of Bush, Clinton, Freeh and others? Or
simply to further the cover-up in order to finally "resolve" this issue?
McVeigh allegedly gave a false name, using fake ID in the name of "Bob
Kling" to rent the Ryder truck, yet he rented a hotel room where he parked
this big beacon the same day using his own name. How come? We sure have a
lot of strange things and numerous "Tim McVeigh's" running around.
How come we have so many Ryder trucks and how come everyone likes yellow
Ryder trucks so much?

Dennis Mahon, grand poo-ba of the Eloim City crowd, a very bad guy, make
no mistake about it. Carol Howe was apparently involved with this guy. Ms. Howe
was an ATF undercover informant later charged and tried by the government; she was acquitted. As I
said, everyone seems to love yellow Ryder trucks, from the World Trade Center to OKC to Eloim
City. How come no one ever rents U-Haul or some other brand? How come they're always from
Ryder and always yellow? Ryder rents white trucks, I've seen them. The reason is simple - Ryder
Trucks is
a CIA proprietary company. The yellow Ryder truck is a "trigger", an indicator
to Law Enforcement that some illegality is underway, and the truck is
involved. makes it very simple for them.

On May 8, 1995, Michael Fortier, who has just been given an 18 month pass
off his 12.5 year prison term, told CNN "I do not believe Tim blew up any
building in Oklahoma. There's nothing for me to look back on and say,
'Yeah, that might have been. I should have seen it back then.' There's
nothing like that." Two weeks later, he claims that he and McVeigh actually
visited the OKC federal building and "cased" the place.
What does Hoppy Heidelberg have to say about this? If you've read my
previous posts or kept up with this bombing through other sources, you know
that Hoppy was the original foreman of the grand jury that eventually
indicted McVeigh and Nichols. You can read a really good interview with
Hoppy at: http://www.devvy.com/9606.html#grand
Hoppy has this to say in that interview:
"Q: Let's talk about Michael Fortier, McVeigh's friend. At first when the
FBI questioned he said McVeigh would never have blown-up the federal
building and killed all those people. He said all the FBI had on McVeigh
was his arrest for a traffic violation and a concealed weapons
charge. Then a couple of months later he's saying that he and McVeigh
actually went to OKC and cased the federal building with an eye to bombing
it. What's going on here?
A: No. You're off base on that.
Q: You mean on Fortier's confession? He's confessed to being a participant
in the bombing.
A: That's not it.
Q: I don't understand.
A: Let me put it this way, if I had been Fortier's attorney, he would have
walked. He wouldn't have given a statement and he would have walked.
Q: That's pretty strong.
A: There's a lot you need to know about Fortier.
Q: In the Media Bypass article, you said he was just a kid and the FBI put
a big scare into him.
A: Tremendous pressure. They brought 24 hour-a-day pressure on him for
several months at great expense.
They were on him at his job in Kingman, AZ., and because of that he was
fired. They were on him at his home at his trailer, too.
Q: That much?
A: Do you see?
Q: Well, I know there was a weapons charge they were threatening Fortier
with, and I believe they also said they'd put his wife in jail if he didn't
cooperate.
A: It has to do with the sheer amount of pressure over that period of time.
Q: Wearing him down.
A: He had no attorney.
Q: Are you serious?
A: For that whole period. And he wasn't under arrest either.
Q: That's - A: He was pressured for 24 hours a day and e had no
attorney. He's a kid. He's not smart enough to understand what's going on.
Q: Not smart enough - A: To realize the FBI had nothing on him. He had no
one to advise him.
Q: The FBI couldn't arrest him?
A: They didn't want to arrest him.
Q: Why not?
A: Because if they did, they'd have to appoint a lawyer for him. It was
months before he was arrested.
Q: I'm digesting this. It's very bizarre.
A: He got conned.
Q: But eventually he did give them what they wanted. He confessed to being
involved in the crime with McVeigh.
A: You're missing it.
Q: Well, if he hasn't made an outright confession - A: Let me ask you
something. What's the fastest way to get from Kingman, AZ., to Southern
Kansas?
Q: I have no idea. If Fortier and McVeigh were traveling from Kingman to
Southern Kansas....
A: They'd go through OKC.
Q: Oh. Fortier just told the FBI they had been in OKC on their way to
Kansas? That's all? He didn't say they were casing the federal building?
A: You're warmer.
Q: Well, all right. If Fortier never told the FBI they cased the building...
A: It's somewhere in between.
Q: In between? You mean, it's between they were just passing through OKC
and they were casing the building?
A: You're warmer.
Q: Fortier told the FBI they were in OKC on the way to Kansas and they went
by the federal building, and they looked at it. Something like that.
A: Something like that.
Q: And there was never a real admission about planning to blow up the
building.
A: You need to read Fortier's confession. It was printed in the Daily
Oklahoman.
Q: Fortier, the prosecution's big witness, never confessed. Is that what
you're saying? Not even close?
A: Not even close.
Q: But the prosecution didn't need him to gain an indictment against McVeigh.
A: They want Fortier as a witness in the actual trial. Big time. But if
his statement is so far south of being a confession, then they can't really
use him at the trial.
Q: No they can use him. What he has to say won't make an impression on
some jurors, but it could tip the scales for other more gullible
jurors. The FBI spent all this time pressuring the hell out of Fortier.
A: That's very important because you see, obviously that was the best they
could do. They stayed with him so long because they had nothing better.
Fortier's involvement in the bombing was so minimal it was a waste of
time. If I was the FBI man in charge, I would have made one run at Fortier
and then forgotten all about him.
Q: So in other words, he never confessed to casing the building with McVeigh.
A: The media has completely exaggerated it. Fortier and McVeigh were
driving through OKC on the way to Kansas and they passed by the federal
building. Something like that.
Q: And the media stretched that.
A: Something like that.
Q: And the FBI spent so much time pressuring Fortier to link McVeigh to the
bombing because they had nothing better.
A: They had nothing better.
Q: But you feel McVeigh is linked to the bombing.
A: Yes, I do. But the FBI relied on a man, Fortier, who really couldn't
provide anything important to them. You need to remember that. That's
important. There's more to this." *End*

Why did Terry Nichols turn himself in to police and give detailed
statements to the FBI without an attorney present? He sees his name out on
the television set and goes in to set the record straight. If you were
responsible for this heinous crime, would you hang around your farm house
and then go turn yourself in for questioning? I guess if you're really dumb.
You won't believe it, but I've run out of questions for now. It sure would
be nice to get some answers. Stay tuned. I'm sure things are likely to
get even more twisted as the beltway boys sweat big time in the weeks to come.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Government Had Prior Knowledge Of The Bombing
MORE....>>
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/mcveigh_patsy.htm   

Main Page - Sunday, 12/10/06

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)