Stacey Miller
IMPEACH BUSH AND DECLARE WAR ON MEXICO
Mon Dec 9 20:53:43 2002
208.152.73.72

From: Stacey Miller sj_miller68@yahoo.com

Date: Sun, Dec 8, 2002, 6:01 pm

IMPEACH BUSH AND DECLARE WAR ON MEXICO

By: William A. Shields

On March 9, 1916, Francisco "Pancho" Villa crossed the
border and invaded the United States, sacking and
looting the town of Columbus, New Mexico. This is not
the last time the United States would be invaded by an
army of Mexicans.

Millions of Mexicans have crossed the border in recent
years and not one of them has come with honorable
intentions. Since they intended to, then in fact did
cross our southern border illegally, they are
criminals, the lot. But many are more than just
criminals; they are agents of a foreign government,
here to destroy our great nation state.

They come with fake ID cards, issued by the Mexican
government, for use in the United States to obtain
employment, driverís licenses and bank accounts. Why
not simply get a passport and have it stamped at the
border upon entering and leaving the way it is done by
legal travelers with honorable intentions?

They come with knapsack type ìcareî packages supplied
again by the Mexican government, to assist them in
their crime of crossing our border and violating our
laws. Why doesnít the Mexican government do something
about the intolerable massive corruption that causes
Mexicans to flee as if from a burning building?

Meanwhile, President Bush refers to Mexico and
Mexicans as our ìfriendsî and our ìneighbors.î I have
friends and neighbors and none of them have ever
broken into my back door and demanded a seat at the
table. Mr. Bush, by aiding and abetting this criminal
behavior has made himself an accessory before during
and after the fact. It is time to say it. Mr. Bushís
open borders policy is not born of negligence or
stupidity. It is an act of criminal intent and
treason. For that reason, I wish to go on the record
here and now, as one who is calling for the
impeachment of George Bush for treason, high crimes
and misdemeanors.

Mr. Bush and his circle of neo-cons and chicken hawks
want us in a war with Iraq. As far as I am able to
know, Iraq has never threatened one thimble full of
American soil anywhere or at any time. I do not
believe that Iraq poses a clear and present threat to
Americaís interests, nor do I believe Iraq has
impugned Americaís honor in a manner requiring a
military response.

It is the height of arrogance for the United States to
demand that a sovereign nation, ANY nation, disarm.
Just as a private citizen has a right to self-defense
and self-determination, so does a nation. And while
Iraq is being strip searched for the same kind of
weapons that are stockpiled like cord wood in the
U.S., the drumbeat of CIA propaganda about Saddamís
atrocities (torture, eye gouging) gets louder as the
war season (winter) in Iraq approaches.

And what will happen on the border while we are
distracted by a war in Iraq? What kind of pro
immigration, anti- nation, and world government
promoting legislation will be rushed through congress
while the people are looking the other way? What
sort of sucker punch can we expect from the globalists
masquerading as conservatives in Washington?

Pickpockets call it the ìstallî. When a home run is
hit and the fans leap to their feet, mesmerized by the
flight of the ball, someoneís wallet is being plucked.
I heard one remark that if he had 50,000 hands he
could pick 50,000 pockets. Yes, sports fans,
pickpockets love the long ball. And war is the
grandest slam of them all.

So if we are to fight a war, why not fight a moral
one, for sound reasons, against an enemy that poses a
clear and present danger to our republic? Letís bring
our troops home from the Balkans and Germany and Japan
and declare war on Mexico. Lets demand a ìregime
changeî in Mexico, since such a change is clearly in
our nationís best interest.

As soon as we declare war, every illegal alien inside
the U.S. becomes an enemy agent, subject to arrest and
military tribunal.

And now to sum: Impeach Bush, forget this Iraq folly
and declare war on Mexico. Otherwise, keep your hand
on your wallet.

http://i.am/jah/plan.htm
=========================================================
The Problem With Coalitions
U.S. Border Control
8180 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1070
McLean, Virginia 22102-3860

Phone (703) 356-6568
Fax (703) 356-5085

For more information, contact:
Edward Nelson, USBC President
703-356-6568; ednelson@usbc.org

For Immediate Release:
September 20, 2001

America didn't need a coalition to strike a killing blow to the world's terrorists. All we needed was the courage to act.

Certainly, we could use a few legitimate allies who we could depend upon. It would also be useful to obtain intelligence and logistical support from other friendly nations. But we certainly did not need this so-called coalition.

This coalition serves no military purpose. It appears to have been designed by our State Department, not our Defense Department. It was more an act of political correctness than a plan of action.

Ask yourself why are we asking countries like China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan and even Cuba to join our Coalition to fight terrorism? And why do we feel the need to bribe some of these countries to join the Coalition by offering aid packages, removing sanctions or forgiving debt owed to us?

I seriously question, not just the value, but the motives of so-called "friends" like the Arab League, the Organization of the Islamic Conference, China or Iran's offer of "'full solidarity' with United States in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks" The Arab League? Iran? China? These are our allies? Who's kidding whom?

These guys aren't going to help us. Why are we inviting them to join the Coalition Against Terrorism when we know they support and arm terrorists?

China inked up a trade agreement with the Taliban on September 11th, the day of the attack. And weren't they the country selling Silkworm missiles to Iraq during Operation Desert Storm?

In this age of political correctness, America has forgotten how to conduct a war.

Our spy satellites had been tracking every terrorist camp for decades. All of this effort at coalition building has given the terrorists the time they needed to break camp and go underground.

Within hours after the bombing, we could have ... and should have ... blasted every known terrorist training camp with the intent of killing as many terrorists as possible.

If we are claiming to be making war on all terrorists, it was unimportant whether a particular group of terrorists did or did not participate in this particular attack on America. And we -- not Russia or China or any other "ally"-- should decide who we think are legitimate targets for termination.

If we allow Coalition members to vote on who is a terrorist, the worst of them will be exempted and our so-called "War on Terrorism" will be about as effective as our "War on Drugs" or any of our other half-hearted, coalition hamstrung, politically correct, multicultural failures.

Thousands of Americans lie dead in the rubble and our leaders are still posturing and trying to get world opinion on our side. This is not how you fight a war on terrorism.

A real war will be dirty and ugly. We need to have the moral courage to avenge the murder of our fellow Americans alone, if necessary, and without world opinion on our side.

This is our war. If friends and allies want to help, fine. But, at the end of the day, it will be America who will rid the world of terrorism.

http://www.usbc.org/