-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: RADTriage Color Brochures arrived in Tampa.
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:39:25 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Ruth D. Bundy or Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr.
To: Gordhan N. Patel gnpatel@jplabs.com
CC: apfn@apfn.org, "Fred Lucci" sales@sirad-usa.com, inquiries@un.org
Thanks Dr. Patel. Now ALL have it and can use whatever they desire. Did
notice yours was different than Fred's and even different than the one
you sent this time so we scanned YOURS. Key is to Right of Indicators
the wording second line is changed or moved... Anyway you know what we
mean. It is up to Ken and Joan as to which if any they put up on the
site.
You really must hear the digital voice from Paul on DU.
THE SHORTCUT DIRECT TO THE MP3 AUDIO IS:
http://www.apfn.org/audio/Depleted-Uranium-Alert.mp3
That is a nice touch! Computers cannot say WIND as that which is in a
breeze or when one starts up loading the spring on a clock. Otherwise it
is still very good! Old Radiomen like Ken Vardon could have sent it in
Morse Code with a speedkey... But we still like voice!
Ralph
-------Original Message-------
From: Gordhan N. Patel
Date: 12/3/2006 7:43:24 PM
To: Ruth D. Bundy or Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr.
Cc: apfn@apfn.org; Fred Lucci; inquiries@un.org
Subject: Re: RADTriage Color Brochures arrived in Tampa.
Ralph,
Attached is a PFD version of the brochure. However, you may use that of
Fred.
Gordhan
Ruth D. Bundy or Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr. wrote:
Dr. Patel and others:
I do indeed thank you for the Priority Mail shipment of the Dual sided
color brochures. They will be sent out shortly. I don't know if you have
them in JPEG or PDF versions scanned but it might help later. Here
attached is my scan at only 200 level when you can perhaps get it to 500
or already have same in JPEG. Might check and send it to Ken at APFN and
maybe he can place it on the net.
Ken Vardon has a digital voice presentation from a Paul which tells far
more about the dangers of Depleted Uranium Weapon particle exposure and
I anticipate soon the entire Planet will be talking about same. The APFN
skull and crossbones is not copyrighted and you can lift it, place
whatever you desire on same and put it out with my full appreciation and
permission -- especially you spent $8.50 USD mailing me the brochures.
My way of saying THANKS DR. PATEL.
AUDIO: DEPLETED URANIUM, THE PLAGUE OF 2006
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=106670;title=APFN
THE SHORTCUT DIRECT TO THE MP3 AUDIO IS:
http://www.apfn.org/audio/Depleted-Uranium-Alert.mp3
Might recommend pulling off the Audio file and taking a listen. Will
sure be looking forward to seeing a short FILM showing how easy it would
be to have field supervisors and parents review the RADTriage unit in
the field. Both Ruth and I wear ours daily and show anyone interested
how simple it would be to check daily, weekly and monthly the radiation
level we were exposed to in the field.
You may find my interest in the dosimeter and banning DU somewhat like
compulsive behaviour but remember we do it for the hundreds of thousands
of Veteran's from all Nations who are going to suffer as well as the
Iraqi and other Nations PEOPLE which make up Humanity across the Globe.
Many who serve cannot say anything... We can speak and write plus mail
out and e-mail FOR THEM!
Will see how our MFC 9700 or MFC 8840D ALL IN ONE printer scans your
pages. IF finally allowed to visit to speak at the UN we can take these
to all of the permanent representatives so they can see what America
SHOULD be made to issue each and every living person in Iraq Annually to
measure the radiation levels which would include those brave
unsuspecting men and women from America and Allied Nations.
I forsee the units being attached to all TANKS and heavy equipment which
fire the projectiles in a stick-on item we now use for UPS or FEDEX
shipping lables. Each sealed and dated with the dosimeter plus paperwork
included for the next visit by reader. SHOULD BE AT ALL RANGES where
these weapons and equipment still contaminated are located. But that is
just the ravings of an old Veteran!
Ralph and Ruth
Tampa
120306
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Depleted Uranium
Information about depleted uranium in question and answer form
GOOGLE: Depleted Uranium
Depleted uranium
Uranium
* Metallic uranium (U) is a silver-white, lustrous, dense, weakly
radioactive element. It is ubiquitous throughout the natural
environment, and is found in varying but small amounts in rocks, soils,
water, air, plants, animals and in all human beings.
* Natural uranium consists of a mixture of three radioactive isotopes
which are identified by the mass numbers 238U (99.27% by mass), 235U
(0.72%) and 234U (0.0054%).
* On average, approximately 90 µg (micrograms) of uranium exists in the
human body from normal intakes of water, food and air. About 66% is
found in the skeleton, 16% in the liver, 8% in the kidneys and 10% in
other tissues.
* Uranium is used primarily in nuclear power plants. However, most
reactors require uranium in which the 235U content is enriched from
0.72% to about 1.5-3%.
Depleted uranium
* The uranium remaining after removal of the enriched fraction contains
about 99.8% 238U, 0.2% 235U and 0.001% 234U by mass; this is referred to
as depleted uranium or DU.
* The main difference between DU and natural uranium is that the former
contains at least three times less 235U than the latter.
* DU, consequently, is weakly radioactive and a radiation dose from it
would be about 60% of that from purified natural uranium with the same
mass.
* The behaviour of DU in the body is identical to that of natural
uranium.
* Spent uranium fuel from nuclear reactors is sometimes reprocessed in
plants for natural uranium enrichment. Some reactor-created
radioisotopes can consequently contaminate the reprocessing equipment
and the DU. Under these conditions another uranium isotope, 236U, may be
present in the DU together with very small amounts of the transuranic
elements plutonium, americium and neptunium and the fission product
technetium-99. However, the additional radiation dose following intake
of DU into the human body from these isotopes would be less than 1%.
Applications of depleted uranium
* Due to its high density, about twice that of lead, the main civilian
uses of DU include counterweights in aircraft, radiation shields in
medical radiation therapy machines and containers for the transport of
radioactive materials. The military uses DU for defensive armour plate.
* DU is used in armour penetrating military ordnance because of its high
density, and also because DU can ignite on impact if the temperature
exceeds 600°C.
Exposure to uranium and depleted uranium
* Under most circumstances, use of DU will make a negligible
contribution to the overall natural background levels of uranium in the
environment. Probably the greatest potential for DU exposure will follow
conflict where DU munitions are used.
* A recent United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report giving
field measurements taken around selected impact sites in Kosovo (Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia) indicates that contamination by DU in the
environment was localized to a few tens of metres around impact sites.
Contamination by DU dusts of local vegetation and water supplies was
found to be extremely low. Thus, the probability of significant exposure
to local populations was considered to be very low.
* A UN expert team reported in November 2002 that they found traces of
DU in three locations among 14 sites investigated in Bosnia following
NATO airstrikes in 1995. A full report is expected to be published by
UNEP in March 2003.
* Levels of DU may exceed background levels of uranium close to DU
contaminating events. Over the days and years following such an event,
the contamination normally becomes dispersed into the wider natural
environment by wind and rain. People living or working in affected areas
may inhale contaminated dusts or consume contaminated food and drinking
water.
* People near an aircraft crash may be exposed to DU dusts if
counterweights are exposed to prolonged intense heat. Significant
exposure would be rare, as large masses of DU counterweights are
unlikely to ignite and would oxidize only slowly. Exposures of clean-up
and emergency workers to DU following aircraft accidents are possible,
but normal occupational protection measures would prevent any
significant exposure.
Intake of depleted uranium
* Average annual intakes of uranium by adults are estimated to be about
0.5mg (500 μg) from ingestion of food and water and 0.6 μg from
breathing air.
* Ingestion of small amounts of DU contaminated soil by small children
may occur while playing.
* Contact exposure of DU through the skin is normally very low and
unimportant.
* Intake from wound contamination or embedded fragments in skin tissues
may allow DU to enter the systemic circulation.
Absorption of depleted uranium
* About 98% of uranium entering the body via ingestion is not absorbed,
but is eliminated via the faeces. Typical gut absorption rates for
uranium in food and water are about 2% for soluble and about 0.2% for
insoluble uranium compounds.
* The fraction of uranium absorbed into the blood is generally greater
following inhalation than following ingestion of the same chemical form.
The fraction will also depend on the particle size distribution. For
some soluble forms, more than 20% of the inhaled material could be
absorbed into blood.
* Of the uranium that is absorbed into the blood, approximately 70% will
be filtered by the kidney and excreted in the urine within 24 hours;
this amount increases to 90% within a few days.
Potential health effects of exposure to depleted uranium
* In the kidneys, the proximal tubules (the main filtering component of
the kidney) are considered to be the main site of potential damage from
chemical toxicity of uranium. There is limited information from human
studies indicating that the severity of effects on kidney function and
the time taken for renal function to return to normal both increase with
the level of uranium exposure.
* In a number of studies on uranium miners, an increased risk of lung
cancer was demonstrated, but this has been attributed to exposure from
radon decay products. Lung tissue damage is possible leading to a risk
of lung cancer that increases with increasing radiation dose. However,
because DU is only weakly radioactive, very large amounts of dust (on
the order of grams) would have to be inhaled for the additional risk of
lung cancer to be detectable in an exposed group. Risks for other
radiation-induced cancers, including leukaemia, are considered to be
very much lower than for lung cancer.
* Erythema (superficial inflammation of the skin) or other effects on
the skin are unlikely to occur even if DU is held against the skin for
long periods (weeks).
* No consistent or confirmed adverse chemical effects of uranium have
been reported for the skeleton or liver.
* No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans.
* Although uranium released from embedded fragments may accumulate in
the central nervous system (CNS) tissue, and some animal and human
studies are suggestive of effects on CNS function, it is difficult to
draw firm conclusions from the few studies reported.
Maximum radiation exposure limits and their limited application to
uranium and depleted uranium
The International Basic Safety Standards, agreed by all applicable UN
agencies in 1996, provide for radiation dose limits above normal
background exposure levels.
* The general public should not receive a dose of more than 1
millisievert (mSv) in a year. In special circumstances, an effective
dose of up to 5 mSv in a single year is permitted provided that the
average dose over five consecutive years does not exceed 1 mSv per year.
An equivalent dose to the skin should not exceed 50 mSv in a year.
* Occupational exposure should not exceed an effective dose of 20 mSv
per year averaged over five consecutive years or an effective dose of 50
mSv in any single year. An equivalent dose to the extremities (hands and
feet) or the skin should not surpass 500 mSv in a year.
* In case of uranium or DU intake, the radiation dose limits are applied
to inhaled insoluble uranium-compounds only. For all other exposure
pathways and the soluble uranium-compounds, chemical toxicity is the
factor that limits exposure.
Guidance on exposure based on chemical toxicity of uranium
WHO has guidelines for determining the values of health-based exposure
limits or tolerable intakes for chemical substances. The tolerable
intakes given below are applicable to long-term exposure of the general
public (as opposed to workers). For single and short-term exposures,
higher exposure levels may be tolerated without adverse effects.
* The general public's intake via inhalation or ingestion of soluble DU
compounds should be based on a tolerable intake value of 0.5 µg per kg
of body weight per day. This leads to an air concentration of 1 µg/m3
for inhalation, and about 11 mg/y for ingestion by the average adult.
* Insoluble uranium compounds with very low absorption rate are markedly
less toxic to the kidney, and a tolerable intake via ingestion of 5 µg
per kg of body weight per day is applicable.
* When the solubility characteristics of the uranium compounds are not
known, which is often the case in exposure to DU, it would be prudent to
apply 0.5 µg per kg of body weight per day for ingestion.
Monitoring and treatment of exposed individuals
* For the general population, neither civilian nor military use of DU is
likely to produce exposures to DU significantly above normal background
levels of uranium. Therefore, individual exposure assessments for DU
will normally not be required. Exposure assessments based on
environmental measurements may, however, be needed for public
information and reassurance.
* When an individual is suspected of being exposed to DU at a level
significantly above the normal background level, an assessment of DU
exposure may be required. This is best achieved by analysis of daily
urine excretion. Urine analysis can provide useful information for the
prognosis of kidney pathology from uranium or DU. The proportion of DU
in the urine is determined from the 235U/238U ratio, obtained using
sensitive mass spectrometric techniques.
* Faecal measurement can also give useful information on DU intake.
However, faecal excretion of natural uranium from the diet is
considerable (on average 500 μg per day, but very variable) and this
needs to be taken into account.
* External radiation measurements over the chest, using radiation
monitors for determining the amount of DU in the lungs, require special
facilities. This technique can measure about 10 milligrams of DU in the
lungs, and (except for souble compounds) can be useful soon after
exposure.
* There are no specific means to decrease the absorption of uranium from
the gastrointestinal tract or lungs. Following severe internal
contamination, treatment in special hospitals consists of the slow
intravenous transfusion of isotonic 1.4 % sodium bicarbonate to increase
excretion of uranium. DU levels in the human, however, are not expected
to reach a value that would justify intravenous treatment any more than
dialysis.
Recommendations
* Following conflict, levels of DU contamination in food and drinking
water might be detected in affected areas even after a few years. This
should be monitored where it is considered there is a reasonable
possibility of significant quantities of DU entering the ground water or
food chain.
* Where justified and possible, clean-up operations in impact