H.R. 1702 or the Constitution: Which Will It Be?


Wednesday, 29-Nov-00 21:59:49

    24.14.28.77 writes:

    H.R.1702
    Sponsor: Rep Mink, Patsy T. (introduced 5/5/1999)
    Latest Major Action: 5/13/1999 Referred to House subcommittee
    Title: To amend title 18, United States Code, to ban using the Inter-
    net to obtain or dispose of a firearm.
    To the Colorado Delegation:
    Gentlemen and Ms. DeGette:
    It is with a combination of anger and disbelief that we write
    to you in reference to H.R. 1702, which deals with the rela-
    tionship between the Internet and the possession of firearms.
    With this proposed legislation, both the 1st and 2nd Amend-
    ments have been subjected to open attack! The audacity of
    the sponsor, Ms. Patsy Mink of Hawaii is monumental! Her
    ignorance surpasses that audacity beyond measure! The ig-
    norance of Congress, as a whole, as regards the whole-sale
    violation of Constitutional limitations upon the Federal Gov-
    ernment are, at best, appalling! The most damning evidence,
    to date, gives indication that you are not lacking in knowledge
    of exactly what you have chosen to do! The ignorance involved
    relates to your evident belief that the entire American popu-
    lace will relinquish all God-given and Constitutionally mandated
    rights and walk blithely into the waiting arms of the U.N. with
    it's predisposition toward totalitarian governance!

    Under the provisions of H.R. 1702, users of the Internet would
    be forbidden to engage in the sale or purchase of firearms.
    This would serve to strip the American citizen of his 1st Amend-
    ment rights, as it would limit that which he could legally say in
    reference to his own property or that which he desired to pur-
    chase. It would remove, as well, his 2nd Amendment right to
    keep and bear arms for purposes of self-protection against the
    intrusion of the criminal element upon his right to be secure in
    his papers, property, etal as per the 4th and 5th Amendments
    to the Constitution. It would also disavow the reasoning of the
    Founders in placing the 2nd Amendment so prominently within
    the original ten. That purpose, as is well-known even to the soph-
    istic mind of the U.S. Congress, is to prevent the intrusion of
    government into areas forbidden it by Constitutional fiat! Their
    own experience with the Crown of England had been quite tell-
    ing, and they took pains to insure the new nation against a recur-
    rence of such vile usurpations of the rights of man to life, liberty,
    and the pursuit of happiness!
    Two hundred and twenty four years have passed since the dawn-
    ing of that first Independence Day! We have now come full circle!
    Both of the elements present at Lexington and Concord exist to-
    day! WE THE PEOPLE have become subject to taxation with-
    out representation through the treasonous submission of U.S.
    sovereignty to the globalistic power-mongers of the U.N.! The
    demands of the W.T.O., the I.M.F., Gorbachev, Annan, and every
    3rd World potentate with visions of U.S. wealth dancing in their
    heads as we approach the coming Christmas Season bring vis-
    ions of death and destruction to the mind and heart of every
    American Patriot! Is America to be gift-wrapped and tied with
    a pretty bow and placed beneath a U.N. tree? Are we to be
    plucked and stuffed and roasted for consumption by the raven-
    ous hordes of the New World Order?
    WE THE PEOPLE have been forewarned! And, we now warn you:
    not one inch of America's lands will be reliquished without a fight!
    We will not fire the first shot, but if so engaged, will not back down!
    I will neither bend my knee nor bow my head to the task-masters of
    New York! Bilge-iam, Hitlery, The seeping Gore, etal. will not live to
    see America's Patriot masses submit to U.N. sheerng as so many
    sheep set for slaughter! If we die, we will die free!
    It seems, at present, that all that is left to us is secession. For,
    you who have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution of these
    United States have forsworn those oaths in favor of political expedi-
    ency, self-preservation (in the face of exposure by Clinton's personal
    blackmail team), and personal gain! Are you now salivating in the
    expectation of cushy rewards from the hands of your U.N. masters?
    We doubt they will hold such a treasonous bunch in any height of es-
    teem! Having dispensed with the heads of those who chose to stand
    for freedom, they will turn their sights upon you, lest you choose to
    betray them, as well!
    These words may seem harsh! But, we find them appropriate to the
    actions of your Houses! We find them inadequate to fully express the
    extent of our outrage when confronted with your lack of integrity! It is
    impossible for us to comprehend how you can engage in the disenfran-
    chisement of the nation and continue to perceive yourselves deserving
    of any title save that of "Traitor"! We know of the many Benedict
    Arnolds among you! How many are willing to identify themselves with
    Nathan Hale,Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Paul Revere, Benjamin
    Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, The Swamp Fox, the
    Boston Tea Party, or Lexington and Concord? Had you been present in
    Boston during those fateul days of decision, would we still be singing
    "God Save The Queen"?
    Defeat H.R. 1702! Prove your worth and your honor! Or, go home and
    leave the governing to men and women who possess the courage to
    stand firm for the sovereignty of this nation!
    For Freedom,
    Jeffrey A. and L'isbeth N. Rothe
    4712 South Kalamath Street
    Englewood, Colorado 80110-6417

    L'isbeth Noelle Rothe

CHILDREN IN HARM'S WAY

(Rachel Massey) (29-Nov-00 21:33:23)

Main Page -11/30/00

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)