The Letter to Gore tells only a part of the Story...There is a sequel...Here
it is...JRN


JOHN R. NIEMELA
Col. USAF (Ret)
1776 Wainwright Drive
Reston, VA. 20190
(703) 834-1037
RicNiemela@earthlink.net


Prof. E. Calvin Beisner
Associate Professor of Historical
Theology & Social Ethics
5554 North Federal Highway
Ft. Lauderdale, FL. 33308

Dear Prof. Beisner,

Your well written and appropriate letter to VP Gore echoed the sentiments of
many Christians around the nation. Many do not have the opportunity to
speak out as you have done, but from my observation, the internet is
overflowing with similar sentiment.

We are entering a period in history that points towards the conclusion of
some of the prophetic events anticipated by the early prophets.I see in
Daniel 12 :41-45 an example of the issues to arise..You may disagree with
the analysis, as there are views of the "return" and "Jerusalem" today that
focus only on events ongoing in Palestine since the end of WWII.

I do not see, as some do, the definition of the "glorious land" as being old
Jerusalem, but America, the culmination of the long westward trek of a
people, those with a "new" name, Christian. (See other views that
characterize Jerusalem-II Kings23:27, Jer.26:18, Jer.19:1-12,Rev.3:12)

There are those who do not choose to take the words of the Bible in a
literal sense, preferring to use a "spiritual" context in application of
meaning, however, I see this approach as a cop-out, and a distortion of the
truth of what God intended for us to read.particularly historians..

This is evidenced by verse 45, where God plants his tabernacles, an obvious
reference to a land that certainly qualifies as America.And as if to confirm
this verse, note that we are now discussing Edom.

Well, in Genesis 27:40, we note that Esau, who is Edom (Gen.36:1) is bitter
about having lost his birthright and then his blessing.In appealing to his
father Isaac, he is advised that unfortunately he will live by the sword and
serve his brother, Jacob - then, note the abrupt switch in Isaac's prophetic
comments: the last line reads: " and it shall come to pass when thou shalt
have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck." (This
dominion is destroyed: see all of Obediah)

Now, not only in America, but other western countries, especially in the
U.K. we know who has the "dominion" who controls most of politics in
America, the U.K. and now dictates policy, controls the Media, the
international financial structure, the dispersal of confused ethics that
contribute to the denigration of Christianity.

And because of this current political set-back, the loudest, the most
vociferous cries come from those whose current status is now in jeopardy,
their power diminished and positions lost. Proof of failed policies when in
direct confrontation with true Christianity.God does not put up with the
conduct of a nation and its administration, and the attendant loss of
integrity among its officials.

Ahab and Jezebel certainly were examples of the retribution for similar
events, and the opposition arose by God's direction, in the character of the
military, Jehu, the chief captain of the military of the time.

Similar dominion today, is an obvious status, yet, the age-old concern that
induced St. Paul to flee over a wall in a basket, has so smothered
Christianity with a similar fear of the Jews that Christian Shepherds and
their Flocks are being led into blind corners, down paths that only lead to
the destruction of our Christianity.and current history certainly confirms
this direction.

Who can deny that most of your Florida neighbors who are so bitter about
events in some of the predominantly Jewish counties are also the most
vociferous, as if loosing this election is the last push that would conclude
their dominion..
It is an overwhelming crush that the Media, owned by only 6 corporate
entities, Jewish owned, also supports - as if there was some current N.Y.
"Sanhedrin" that sets a common policy.

As most magazines and newspapers carry almost verbatim articles, it would
seem to confirm Media collusion and output, yet, the fear of being called an
antisemite prohibits the truth from emerging.

The people proceed as if it was o.k., and we let these so-called chosen, do
their thing in a blatant obtrusive manner that so characterizes their
dominion - while Christians, being naively Christian, simply let it go,
quietly confused and misled.

As if the comments of Gen. 12:3 applied to the outcome.when this verse,
appropriated by Pastor Hagee and others, actually is addressed to Abraham,
who was never a Jew, and these current self-styled Jews of today certainly
do not qualify in any case to genetic affiliations with ancient Judah, or
least of all, Israel. (The word Jew did not appear until 1200 years after
Abraham)

To confirm this view, I have included an extract from the Jewish
Encyclopedia of 1904 titled Jesus of Nazareth.There you will see the real
views of the Talmudists, the self-same set of volumes that Jesus so
vehemently criticized, unchanged and severely antiChristian, anti Jesus.

Here you will see comment that is seldom found in our seminaries, in our
universities, as they are not politically correct, not in line with that one
dominant verse in Gen. 12:3.oh, the confusion and misdirection that has led
our people off track and into those blind corners. And the Talmud is behind
it all as the policy guidance that is ignored by our Shepherds.

And to confirm this point, an old, recently deceased very senior leader of
the Presbyterians, a good friend, after reading my comments that decried the
Talmud, wrote and made the comment, "Is the Talmud all that bad?" a
learned, Phd with years of preaching behind him..

Too often, our seminaries fail to focus on Old Testament words, the source
of Law, the edicts under which we are advised how to live, not only
spiritually, but politically, in what we are to eat, live our lives and
associate with our contemporaries --Yet, so many simply dismiss its guidance
and lay claim to being only New Testament Christians, hiding behind the
single great and misinterpreted law, Love.failing to see in this single
commandment, the overarching meaning of this term that Jesus spoke of.He
also said that He came not to change the law!

And, consider St. Pauls comment on this issue, that "Love is the fulfilling
of the Law."

I know that there are many "church-goers" out there who would openly and
loudly contest my comments: the inducements of Gen.12:3 go deep, and the
Jesuit inspired theories of C.I. Schofield and Hal Lindsey et.al, as to end
time events only add to the confusion.

The issues of the Third Temple, the ashes of a Red Heifer, the assumption
that this "return" satisfies most of end time prophecies all lead to the
"rapture" as being the saving aspect for Christians, lifted off into the
heavens to sit in arm chairs in heaven, watching events unfold here on
earth..when there are verses that totally contradict this: Psalm 91:8."with
thine eyes shalt thou see the punishment of the wicked." Etc.. You and
others will be there to see it!

But, like all "decision theology", the idea that man himself makes the move
to accept, to choose to come forward, the altar call, places the power of
salvation with man and not God - the assumption being that it is man who
takes the steps that lead to his salvation, ignoring the judgement and
wisdom of God, a purely humanist viewpoint..

In confirmation, go to Eph.1:2-5, 9, and 11.and then to further add to this
refutation of this decision theology, read John 15:16.it proves the point.
"You did not choose me, No I chose you."

Consider the words of an old, now deceased Preacher, Howard Rand.when
commenting on whether personal salvation is enough.

"Man who preach the gospel of salvation do not recognize that, in itself,
the acceptance of personal salvation will not establish the justice of
Kingdom administration; neither will it bring righteousness in government.
The acceptance by the individual of personal salvation will bring freedom
from guilt of sin, but until the Nation turns to the administration of all
His Laws - until the law of the Lord becomes the law of the land - men will
be subject to the evils of maladministration."

Rand points out that Jesus never preached a selfish doctrine of saving one's
self alone, but he shows that He went about healing, doing good,
comforting,etc, administering to the poor and needy, all the while preaching
the restoration of the Kingdom administration, that equity and justice would
thereby bring peace to all.

If we simply preach personal salvation only and thereby ignore and bypass
the needs of life, the conduct of our leaders, then will those who are in
need, those who may be oppressed, feel that it does not matter..Hardly.

As you may conclude, I am certainly a militant Christian, my views on
current events as associated with our status as Christians in a world that
certainly seeks to destroy it, are like those of Luther.He saw the Jews of
his time, the Talmudists as the chosen, the people of the book , but after
reading the Talmud and observing their conduct, made an abrupt reversal and
proceeded in an opposite direction..

An inherent defense of our Christianity requires the watchmen, the sentinels
to be outspoken, to warn that we are suffering from a blindness, one of
which St. Paul spoke of in Romans 11:25, applying the blindness in part to
"Israel" and to a coming fullness of the times, which appears to be
unfolding before our eyes today.

But, Luther was not unique..Others, like Gen. Washington, Ben Franklin, and
many others have so spoken, yet, with the control of the publishing houses,
the Media, these comments and observations do not reach the ears and eyes of
blinded Christians.and the hoax continues..

This may come as a bit of a shock to you. There is a satisfying comfort in
quietly and pleasantly offering the same avenues of salvation to all in a
universal view that all qualify for entry, and ignore the many comments that
refer to only a remnant..

Universalism, and its attendant multiculturalism have become the prime
movers behind the destruction of Christianity. These policies ignore the
fact that the Law was given ONLY to the Israelites, and only the Israelites
will be judged by the Law.

None of the other races receive even honorable mention in the Bible because
they do not occupy that chosen status that God assigned to the Israelites,
but He also made Covenants with the Israelites that in themselves would also
be beneficial to those outside - these "others", yet, it was incumbent on
these "others" to fall in line, to abide the laws that applies to the
Israelites, to follow the Lord, and not to bring in outside gods as has been
done in the past, as is being done today.

Our saturation by these "others" has been another contributing factor to our
failings, the abandonment of His laws, the self seeking and materially
oriented goals that now take center stage and crimes and sins that were once
so treated, are now acceptable, misceganation, abortion, etc.

And, where does the direction for these digressions come from? From the
edicts of that severely antiChristian Talmud, and its leadership in a
Sanhedrin that shapes policies that overwhelm our nation as it did in the
time of Jesus, the "whited sepluchers" that He also threw out of the Temple,
all characteristically the self-same Money Changers that now totally
dominate America and the western world..

For sure, you did not anticipate that your letter in defense of our
principles would elicit such a response, so at variance with what you
probably know and teach..But, when the Lord presents an opportunity, as He
must do to you as well, it must be the "road taken" even though less
traveled.

As to John 15:16.It is always a matter of choosing, and I am eternally
thankful to have been chosen.

Sincerely,

J. Richard Niemela

J. Richard Niemela