WEBFAIRY
Unitary Power device has been patented
Tue Nov 26 21:02:37 2002
204.189.23.230


I disagree with the verasity of Richard C. Duncan's Malthusian Rehash.
Take Malthus, scratch out "food" and write in "oil" and you can even use the
same frinkin bellcurve diagrams.
Wasn't true then, isn't true now.
It's just another rehash of Eugenics, from a shadowy foundation with even
shadowier financing.

A "Free Energy" ie, Unitary Power device has been patented, and is ready to
begin production next year. This would send oil the way of corset stays and
celluloid collars and whaleoil lamps, if they don't blow up the world chasing
after oil.

The secret government has known about Unitary Power, keeping the knowledge
secret and passing off sightings as "Alien technology."

The intent of the secret government is to reduce humanity back to "a world lit
only by fire" cos that's how humans can be most efficiently controlled.
Lotsa Nukes will fit their purposes grandly.

"It's For Oil" gives them logical cover.



http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/awfulsecret.html

The Awful Secret

The objective of the Bush cabal and the war
in Iraq is to get control of all of the oil
before the blackouts start!
John Kaminski

How stupid are Americans - and how false are
their elected representatives - to believe and
actually repeat the thought that a far-off nation
with the world's second-largest oil reserves, a
battered and constrained nation that had already
witnessed hundreds of thousands of its citizens
killed by the United States, that this bedraggled
and helpless nation is actually a threat deserving
a full-scale invasion by American troops?

How stupid are Americans not to see that all this
war talk is a diversionary tactic, a red herring
meant to cover up crimes of the American
government: widespread corruption that robbed
Americans of billions of dollars in scandals named
Harken, Enron and Halliburton; a meaningless
genocidal attack on Afghanistan that failed to
achieve its stated objective yet killed 5,000
innocent people; and an attack on American soil
that killed another 3,000 Americans. In the
meantime, the highest levels of the U.S.
government work diligently to cover up the
brutal facts that highly placed officials knew this
atrocity was going to happen and did nothing to
stop it. In fact, they wanted it to happen because
it served their purposes.

The shock of 9/11 and the butchery in
Afghanistan have been displaced from the
headlines of the criminally sycophantic
mainstream media as President Bush continues
his ludicrous push for more death and
destruction, constantly changing his rationale as
one lie after another is exposed as vicious fiction.
Make no mistake: the purpose of the illegal and
unconscionable aggression against Iraq is meant
to cover up the Bush administration's complicity
in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York City
and Washington, D.C. The mainstream media, a
virtual interlocking directorate with the Bush
cabinet and his behind-the-scenes moneymen,
continue to ignore the central questions about
9/11:

» why did the air defense apparatus fail
to respond to the hijackings? »why
haven't the stock market anomalies
been investigated and identified?
» why did some people know not to fly
that day?
»Why were fires still burning
underneath three structures of the WTC
five weeks later?

You haven't read that in the New York Times,
and you won't. The attack on Afghanistan was
planned long before 9/11, yet carried out as if it
were a search for someone named Osama bin
Laden. Five thousand dead, Americans
implicated in a horrific massacre, even some
Canadians killed for no good reason. Now it turns
out many of the Taliban were evacuated in U.S.
planes. American military bosses declared the
operation a success, and the newspapers didn't
blink.

In truth it was a total failure. We didn't catch the
alleged perpetrator, against whom, by the way,
we had no hard evidence. Bush and Blair said
they did, but never told us what it was, and still
haven't. All of this obfuscation can only mean
one thing, as any cop or lawyer will tell you. The
people who cover up the facts are the ones who
did the crime. You don't need a college degree to
see that. So now, all of this is erased in public
consciousness by Iraq war talk. One lie after
another.

First they try to link al-Qaida to Saddam; they're
still trying, in fact. Bush counts on the fact that
most Americans don't realize that Saddam and
al-Qaida are enemies, Saddam is an atheist,
al-Qaida supposedly is made up of religious
zealots. Plus, al-Qaida works FOR the U.S. in
Macedonia and Bosnia. Which leads us to another
thing that is never mentioned in the New York
Times: the long history of the relationship
between the Bush and bin Laden families. For
instance, why did all the bin Ladens get flown out
of the country when everybody else was
grounded right after 9/11? You also don't read in
the New York Times that the president's father is
a key player with the Carlyle Group, one of the
nation's biggest defense brokers and that the
Carlyle Group just bought the company that
makes anthrax and smallpox vaccines, which
leads to all sorts of interesting questions about
who actually ordered the anthrax attacks. (See
http://www.unknownnews.net/cdd081202.html)

Some people who don't believe the pap they
read in the New York Times think it's the same
people who ordered 9/11. OK, now that that's
out of the way, let's look again at the red
herring: Iraq. Yes, it is a convenient distraction,
but it's also more than that. It's the next chapter
in the permanent "war against terror." Get your
bets down now on which war will follow: Iran,
Colombia, Philippines, Indonesia. Nothing has
substantially changed with Iraq in the last ten
years. Former weapons inspector Scott Ritter
has eloquently testified that Bush is lying about
Iraq's capability, and as a result, Bush has been
reduced to castigating Saddam in a Spielbergian
future crime sort of way: "Well, he might have
nukes in a few years... "

Why now? Well, first, to cover up BushÕs crimes
at home, which we have just covered. But
there's more to it. As they say, it's the oil,
stupid! Plus Iraq is not producing oil as rapidly as
Saudi Arabia, and the Seven Sisters (or what's
left of them) don't like that. America's intent in
Iraq is to just take the oil. Face that fact.
America will just take it. And once taken, the
U.S. will realize that no one can stop them, and
they'll take the oil in Saudi Arabia, in Venezuela
and Colombia, and in Indonesia. It will all be the
war against terror. As a prediction of BushÕs
plan, consider the recent words of Al-Qaida No. 2
man Ayman Al-Zawahri, recorded by Muslim
superstation Al-Jazeera, that the U.S. has
decided to split Saudi Arabia into separate
entities, including an eastern region, which has
the major oil field and which will be under direct
U.S. control.

Of course there are other reasons that people
point to for this resurgence in America's
aggressive posture. First and foremost is that
Israel is driving U.S. policy. The "axis of evil" is
not America's enemies, but Israel's enemies.
Iraq is no direct threat to the U.S., but it is,
conceivably, to Israel. There are some who say
that America's Christian Zionists are driving this
new and vicious U.S. foreign policy, and that
America is behaving as if Israel's needs were its
own. There is no doubt a large degree of truth to
this, but I don't believe it is the foremost
motivator. Does anybody out there remember
James Watt? He was the government's Interior
Secretary under Reagan back in the 1980s, and
widely castigated (by some liberals) for his
pro-business trashing of the environment.
Comparing then and now almost casts those
corporate plunderers as liberals, seeing what
Bush and his transparently unqualified Cabinet
members like Gayle Norton and Christie
Whitman are doing now.

Watt, a prominent Pentecostal, publicly stated
that we need not worry too much about
exploiting our natural resources because "I don't
know how many future generations we can count
on until the Lord returns." Sometimes here
lately, with all this war talk flying around, I get
to thinking there's an awful secret that Bush and
Cheney and Rumsfeld know, but the rest of us
don't, and it's making them want to just pile up
as much largesse as they can before their
expected apocalypse arrives - an apocalypse, by
the way, that they are doing their level best to
create.

But then I remember the words of Ben Bradlee
during Watergate days: follow the money. When
you look back through history, this is the far
more reliable barometer of why wars are
undertaken than any kind of evangelical
gobbledygook. And that leads me back to, of
course, a website that I believe is the most
important information I've read (except for
maybe Mike Ruppert's www.copvcia.com) since
9/11. It explains clearly why Bush and his
corporate criminal companions are doing what
they're doing. The website is Jay Hanson's
http://www.dieoff.org/page1.htm, an incredible
compendium of information about the oil
industry. The significant article that explains why
the Bush-Cheney gang is doing what it's doing is
The Peak Of World Oil Production and the Road
to the Olduvai Gorge by Richard C. Duncan,
Ph.D. (http://www.dieoff.org/page224.htm)

The shocking theme of this document is that the
world will run out of oil very soon, no later than
2030, and when that happens, civilization as we
know it will end, because there is no power
source as ubiquitously powerful as oil. Don't
think oil. Think electricity. And ask yourself:
What will happen to Western civilization without
electricity? Then think about oil again. Think
about the cars and planes and computers it
powers, and think about how nothing can replace
it. Trot out your stock answers, read the article
and see those answers vaporize. Duncan's thesis
is that the Dark Ages are fast approaching,
because when the oil runs out, and the lights go
out, civilization runs out. "The collapse will be
strongly correlated with an 'epidemic' of
permanent blackouts of high-voltage electric
power networks - worldwide," says Duncan.
"Briefly explained: "When the electricity goes
out, you are back in the Dark Age. And the Stone
Age is just around the corner."

So how does this relate to the Bush cabal and the
war in Iraq? The super rich of the world are in
possession of this information. They know the
cornerstone of Western civilization is electricity,
powered mostly by oil, and they know it's
running out. Their objective is to get control of all
of it, for that incredible day that will soon arrive
when the blackouts start. The blackouts, Duncan
writes, will become more and more frequent
until one day, most of the world will be blacked
out, except for the super rich in their armored
compounds. Don't think that Donald Rumsfeld's
house will be blacked out. He and his friends will
have cornered the electricity market (actually,
he'll be dead by then, but his heirs and disciples
will be in control of the power supply by then -
and this is to say nothing about water). So the
push into Iraq, and soon into Saudi Arabia, will
be aimed at securing enough oil to forestall
blackout day for the rich for as long as possible.
The majority of the rest of the world will be
plunged into darkness and primitivism long
before that, and the world will evolve into a
two-tiered system, even moreso than it is now.
Because there will be those with power, and
those who are left in the dark.

One of the most chilling aspects to Duncan's
report is the forecast that as rolling blackouts
increase sometime shortly after 2008, the death
toll among humans will rise in direct proportion.
Duncan writes: "Australian writer Reg Morrison
foresees that... world population rises to about
7.0 billion in the 2036. Thence it plunges to 3.2
billion in 2090, an average loss of 71.4 million
people per year (deaths minus births) during 54
years." Most of you now reading this will not be
around for that; say a prayer of thanks. Duncan
notes the following: "Where will the Olduvai
die-off occur? Response: Everywhere. But large
cities, of course, will be the most dangerous
places to reside when the electric grids die.
There you have millions of people densely
packed in high-rise buildings, surrounded by
acres-and-acres of blacktop and concrete: no
electricity, no work, and no food. Thus the urban
areas will rapidly depopulate when the electric
grids die. In fact we have already mapped out
the danger zones. (see Living Earth, 1996.)
Specifically: The big cities stand out brightly as
yellow-orange dots on NASA's satellite pictures of
the earth at night. These planetary lights blare
out "Beware," "Warning," and "Danger." The
likes of Los Angeles and New York, London and
Paris, Bombay and Hong Kong are all
unsustainable hot spots."

Read this document. Study it. Understand that
what is happening now is only a slightly
unpleasant foretaste of the unprecedented
disaster to come. This explains why the Bush
cabal is doing what it's doing. The forecast for
the future, if you comprehend what is reported in
Duncan's estimation, is dark. Very dark.

John Kaminski may be reached at
skylax@comcast.net .