Brasscheck TV
High Crimes and Misdemeanors
Tue Nov 21, 2006 23:51

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

The case for impeaching Bush

he Misconduct of Public Men"

The Founding Fathers were crystal clear on the subject of presidential wrong doing:

The president is not above the law. Not only can a president be removed from office, he must be removed from office if he is found guilt of crimes like treason and other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Has George Bush committed impeachable offenses?

John Bonifaz, co-founder of the group "After Downing Street," asks these questions at a recent Congressional hearing on the Iraq War:

1. "Is it a high crime to engage in a conpiracy to deceive and mislead the United States Congress and the American people about the basis for taking the nation into war?

2. Is it a high crime to manipulate intelligence so as to allege falsely a national security threat posed to the United States as a means to try to justify a war against another nation?

3. Is it a high crime to commit a felony via the submission of a report to the United States Congress falsifying the reasons for launcing military action?"

To learn more, visit this site:


Imagine...TV about
what's really going on
Subscribe to Brasscheck TV's
New Program Announcement List

"Start by doing what's necessary, then do what's possible,
and suddenly you are doing the impossible."
- Francis of Assisi

The Great American Conspiracy Theory
11-17-2005, 11:18 PM
OK, the current thread on 9/11 got me thinking. What if all of the conspiracy theories are true?

-We didn't really land on the moon. It was all a staged ploy to assert superiority over the Russians.

-The government actually had a hand in making 9/11 happen. Why?

3) Instant Fulfillment of the Neocon Wish List
For a huge military buildup and Middle East energy control

In September 2000, one year before 9/11, the Bush team's neocon think tank PNAC (Project for a New American Century ( )) published a plan for global domination called "Rebuilding America's Defenses". (Top Bush Administration figures like Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld et al. were signers of PNAC's Statement of Principles ( ).) Their plan called for a huge boost in defense spending, full spectrum dominance over all nations and regions (including outer space), long term petro-resource control with permanent Middle East bases, and a preemptive war policy against recalcitrant states. However, they openly conceded that such a huge "transformation" would take forever "absent some cataclysmic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."

4) Political bonanza for Bush/Rove team
Instant irresistable power in Congress, media and the polls

In 1999, two years before the September 11 attacks, presidential candidate George W. Bush was already talking about the political benefits of attacking Iraq (  ), according to his former ghost writer, Mickey Herskowitz. Bush: "One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief. My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it. If I have a chance to invade... if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed."

Bush's former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill recounted that at their first Cabinet meeting in January, 2001, Iraq oil concession maps were circulated and discussed and that Bush baldly told them to "find me a way ( " to take Iraq.

-The War in Iraq is all about establishing control over oil for the forseeable future, and we will never try to exit the area

-The anthrax scare was also perpetuated by the US govt.

"So why did the White House go on Cipro on the very day of the World Trade Center attacks? Larry Klayman said, 'We believe that the White House knew or had reason to know that an anthrax attack was imminent or underway.' "

What else am I missing? Someone help me connect all the conspiracy dots here.

Main Page - Friday, 11/24/06

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]


messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)