Plaintiff Schlund has pursued a legitimate claim against a
select individual - George W. Bush, Jr., an individual who
became President through illegal activities of fixing the
presidential election Plaintiff Schlund forecasted the plans to
fix the elections and accurately stated how and where and the
details. It is now again a factual reality based on undisputed
evidence that Defendant Bush, an individual, is engaged in a
joint operation, scheme, and plan to effect control in the
precise manner set forth in Plaintiff Schlund's Complaint and
violating Plaintiff Schlund's "rights as a political witness.
Complaint pgs. 1-29. Defendant is and can be held liable by an
honest, fair, and objective judge on the evidence at trial.
Plaintiff adds that the torture of Plaintiff has greatly changed
due to the paranoia of George W. Bush and his agents and the
torture of Plaintiff while on jobs has dramatically changed but
remains heavy while Plaintiff is out of site of a camera.
Plaintiff assumes this reduced torture is a result of the
paranoia of the corrupt agents over their belief that Judge
Mathis may rule fairly as an honest judge. If Judge Mathis rules
for the government many people will die from the use of this
kind of torture by implants and the use of this kind of torture
in the United States will become common place resulting in the
fixing of trials and the protecting of drugs and corruption.
Plaintiff will be forced to go to other countries to write books
that can not be wrote in the United States because of the use of
torture by the government to stop them. Treaties are in force
with many countries on the use of these implants and other
similar devices in clothing and other things. Plaintiff can only
go to countries that would welcome books on the subjects
Plaintiff has information on.
Plaintiff would be forced under torture and under the threat of
death to go to these countries to get the implants removed so
Plaintiff can write books with his returned freedom of speech
denied in America as the lawsuit is appealed. Plaintiff Schlund
can prove in court that the drug investigations against him are
false and Plaintiff Schlund has ten years of hair on his head
that can be tested in court to prove that Plaintiff Schlund has
done no drugs and made no drugs and has not been in contact with
any drugs. Judge Mathis can call Plaintiff Schlund before her at
a time of her choosing for such test to be performed in court.
Mummies that were four thousand years old have been tested for
drugs and have tested positive. Surly Plaintiff Schlund can be
tested in court to prove his innocents.
PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO HAVE HIS CLAIM HEARD BEFORE A JURY NO
MATTER HOW "BIZARRE" IT MAY SOUND TO THE DEFENDANT OR THE COURT
Plaintiff Schlund has the United States Constitutional "right"
to have his lawsuit heard by a jury of his peers "no matter how
bizarre it may sound" to the Defendant or specially, this Court.
See, case on point, State v. Fayle,143 Ariz. 565,658 P.2d 218
(Ariz. App. 1982)
CONCLUSION
Based upon the above said, position Plaintiff Schlund has set
forth sufficient allegations to place Defendant(s) on notice of
the violation of Plaintiff's rights. Defendant's Motion to
Dismiss should be denied and Defendant ordered to answer the
Complaint.
BY:__________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
8520 North 54 Drive
Glendale Arizona 85302
Plaintiff in Pro Per
ORIGINAL hand-delivered this ___ day of October, 2005 to:
Clerk of the Court
U.S. District Court of Arizona
401 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85009
and
COPIES of the foregoing mailed to:
Mr. Richard G. Patrick
Assistant U.S. Attorney
United States Attorney's Office District of Arizona
Two Renaissance Square
40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix Arizona 85004-4408
Fax: (602) 514-7760
Office: (602) 514-7500
Richard.patrick@usdoj.gov
The Honorable Virginia A. Mathis
United States District Court
Sandra Day O'Connor
United States Courthouse, Ste. 130
401 W. Washington St., S.P.C. 1
Phoenix, AZ 85003-2118
By ____________________________.