Schlund v. Bush Update: Part 1 of 4

Charles August Schlund, III
8520 North 54th Drive
Glendale, Arizona 85302
Phone 602-670-2017
Plaintiff In Pro Per

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles August Schlund, III, an individual

Plaintiff,

v.

George W. Bush, President of The United States of America, a Sovereign Nation; et al.,

Defendants

Case No: CV-03-1590 PHX VAM

OPPOSITION TO PRESIDENT BUSH'S MOTION TO DISMISS.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Charles August Schlund, III ("Plaintiff Schlund") submits his Opposition to President Bush's ("Defendant Bush") Motion to Dismiss.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendant Bush, through his undersigned counsel, as usual, sets forth his unsupported and unqualified attorney impressions, opinions, and conclusions, which are not evidence or under oath or truthful which can be considered by this Court in his Motion to Dismiss. President Bush, through his undersigned counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard G. Patrick ("Attorney Patrick") does not possess the competency of any noted expertise in the field related to what is commonly referred to in the medical field as "neuroprosthesis," "nano prosthetic implants," "nano implants," "brain implants," "brain chips," neurotechnology implants," telepathic communicating devices," "surveillance implants," and other intelligence or other identifier names related to the manipulation of the body or brain for military, surveillance, torture, medical purposes and other purposes. In fact, it is doubtful Attorney Patrick has ever set foot in a scientific research clinic which specializes in implant research and the related fields, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, electromagnetic radiation or stimulation, stimulation by sound, electricity and the like. These areas are of particular interest to the military and the medical fields because of the resurgence for the need for controlled body and brain stimulation and control.

The United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is the well-known primary and major funder of brain implant research and has been using various types of implants, including brain implants and brain chips in research for soldiers to boost their cognitive capacities, control pain, and the transmission and receipt of wireless telecommunications in the field under combat conditions, and other implants for tracking and location verification similar to that used by Global Position Satellite Networks. On the medical side, which auto-connects to the military side, are some of the disclosed (while many advancements are intentionally not disclosed or copyrighted or patented, for obvious reasons), which include but are not limited to: nano implants transferred through laser technology connected to the optic and Vagus nerve for treating disorders such as depression, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, panic attacks, chronic attack, and nano-nerve which relate to light transfers and light sensitive chips that mimic the eye signal processing ability and stimulate the optic nerve or the visual cortex, helping the blind. It is undisputed that monkeys can control computers and robotic arms "merely by thinking," not telekinetically but via implanted electrodes picking up neuro signals from nano implants, empowering the paralyzed and controlling muscle spasms thanks to the new release of battery powered electrodes that are implanted in the subject's brain and surgeries that repaired the subject's twisted muscles and lengthened the tendons, allowing the subjects to walk after being crippled most of their life.

There are chips and nano-brain chips that have success in restoring the memory of those afflicted with Alzheimer's Disease and other disorders, proved successful in treating spinal chord injuries, strokes, and the millions who are legally blind. See Scientific American, Oct. 2005 edition, "The Forgotten Era of Brain-Control Chips." In fact, the pros and cons of "brain chips" which function off of wireless telemetry as an integrated technology with computers and the advancements in computations, electrodes, micro-electronics, neurotechnology, brain scanning technologies, and brain implant technology and research is at the forefront of importance due to the potential adverse consequences of such technology being abused by authoritarian governments to gain more power or by terrorists to wreck destruction and control people of importance in their network. It is absolutely asinine and ludicrous to consider the ridiculous statements of Attorney Patrick who works for the well-known primary financial backer and research of brain technology, especially nano brain implants, who have openly admitted the necessity or research and field use of implanting brain chips in soldiers, as aforesaid. Moreover, President Bush's White House Council on Bioethics have been ordered by the President not to pursue anyone involved in brain implant research, despite the ethical controversies due to its military or, as in the case before the bench, quasi-military purposes.

It is not the reasonable and highly beneficial uses of implant technology but the destructive and abusive use and the technology for "physical control" over the subject target which is not static but "dynamic." Id. Scientific America, Vol. 293, No. 4. Here, Plaintiff Schlund, in his First Amended Verified Complaint For Deprivation of Civil Rights Through Racketeering Activities ("Amended Complaint"), filed September 15, 2005, incorporated by this reference as though set forth verbatim, states the acts and conduct of Defendants in subjecting him to harassment, persecution, and torture of him as a political witness and/or whistle blower in an effort to obstruct justice and give the false impression that said Defendants are not monitoring, harassing, torturing, invading his privacy, or attempting to influence or control him through wireless technology implanted electrical devices in the cover up of murder, treason, drug running and the fixing of the elections of the United States of America as Plaintiff Schlund had briefed the FBI before the government injected Plaintiff with the implants to cover up the crimes. Further, that said Defendants systematically use wireless technology and other types of implants and associated electronic product(s) used against him to invade his privacy and track his communications, telecommunications, and physical whereabouts on a daily basis and will never arrest Plaintiff to allow him a trial to prove his innocents.

There is no chance of an arrest of Plaintiff for the crimes Plaintiff is under investigation for because the government knows plaintiff can prove how the government framed him to cover up murder and treason and the fixing of the presidential elections of the United States under the protection of Defendant's. In fact Plaintiff whishes to be arrested so he can prove his innocents in trial, the government monitoring and torturing Plaintiff is only to deny Plaintiff his rights under the American Constitution and to stop Plaintiff from writing books and articles for publication to cover up the truth, The Assistant US Attorney motion to dismiss if also to cover up the truth and to stop Plaintiff from proving the case in trail.

In America the government does not burn books it injects those that could write embarrassing books and then tortures them with implants in an investigation to stop them from writing the books. Still further, Plaintiff has alleged the systematic use by Defendants to utilize the judicial system (including outright lying to this Court), as well as use of Doran v. McGinness, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994) in attempts to systematically invalidate valid civil rights cases against these Defendants and such cases filed against other departments/agencies of the United States Federal Government and others, implanting in the subject target and using wireless technology in implants in an illegal manner, constituting acts and conduct of racketeering and intentional deprivation of civil rights through such racketeering activities to witness tamper, obstruct justice, and thwart any lawsuits to continue to conceal the illegal use of the wireless technology, the methods used to install or implant the wireless implant(s) for the purposes set forth in the Complaint. These illegal acts are done by corrupt judges and corrupt agents under the protection of higher corruption in the government so their crimes appear to be legal while using perjury, planted evidence and torture to justify their evil corrupt acts.

Plaintiff Schlund has never made any claim or statement of telepathic brain implants in him and no such claim has been made in any lawsuit or motions or anywhere else. Plaintiff Schlund does not believe telepathic communications to or from him are possible. Plaintiff Schlund does not believe he has any brain implants. Plaintiff Schlund was injected with implants that are well know to the courts and are used in pets and people every day causing extreme pain and suffering to large numbers of American citizens and Plaintiff Schlund has thousands of witnesses to this form of torture that can be called upon to testify to the governments crime committed under the color and cover of authority. The court knows about the implants Plaintiff Schlund is referring to and knows that they are used in great numbers in investigations of American citizens and Plaintiff Schlund can prove that these implants are also used for torture and murder in the removal of political and economic threats to those in positions of power.

Plaintiff Schlund can call to the witness stand or before the court people who killed their children after being injected with these devices as a result of the torture of them from the implants and Plaintiff Schlund can call to the witness stand people that killed toddlers because of the torture of them driving them mad and insane after being injected with these devices. These crimes would have never happened if the government had not corruptly used implants and other electronic devices for the use of torture to remove witnesses and dissidents and for economic and political gain and to cover up corruption within the government. For the court to believe that the government requires at least four implants in the neck and ears of Plaintiff to only monitor him would be only a Paranoid Delusion. Plaintiff can demonstrate that one small microphone can monitor a whisper at 35 feet through the air and the Human body is mostly water that sounds travels through extremely well compared to air. Plaintiff can install four such microphones in a gallon of milk to simulate a human head and neck and each microphone can hear everything as well as the other.

The only time the government installs implants in the manner used against Plaintiff Schlund is for the use of torture. This can easily be proven in trial or in a demonstration for the court. The court fully knows that pets are injected with electronic implants all the time and they do not require four implants to monitor the people around them. The implants in Plaintiff also contain filters that are designed to filter out background noise. No monitoring device designed for investigations that has a filter in it is really designed for monitoring. Only someone delusional could believe that the monitoring device was designed to filter out some of the sounds being monitored. In real monitoring devices the filters are always in the receiving equipment not in the monitoring equipment. The filters are really designed to filter out the use of torture by sound or speech. Plaintiff Schlund has read all the CIA, DEA, NSA and other files on the designing, testing, manufacturing and use of these devices in the Don Bolles files in 1977. Every detail of the devices and how they were designed for torture was in the government files. By authorizing the use of implants and other devices in contact or close proximity to the body authorizes the use of torture because torture modes can be incorporated into the devices to control and torture political and or economic, witnesses, dissidents and threats such as Plaintiff Schlund.