Alberto Gonzales: A Record of Injustice


Without Justice, their is JUST_US!
Alberto Gonzales: A Record of Injustice
Thu Nov 11, 2004 16:18
64.140.158.206

Alberto Gonzales: A Record of Injustice
As White House Counsel
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=246536

GONZALES APPROVED MEMO AUTHORIZING TORTURE: An August 2002 Justice Department memo "was vetted by a larger number of officials, including...the White House counsel's office and Vice President Cheney's office." According to Newsweek, the memo "was drafted after White House meetings convened by George W. Bush's chief counsel, Alberto Gonzales, along with Defense Department general counsel William Haynes and [Cheney counsel] David Addington." The memo included the opinion that laws prohibiting torture do "not apply to the President's detention and interrogation of enemy combatants." Further, the memo puts forth the opinion that the pain caused by an interrogation must include "injury such as death, organ failure, or serious impairment of body functions—in order to constitute torture." The methods outlined in the memo "provoked concerns within the CIA about possible violation of the federal torture law [and] also raised concerns at the FBI, where some agents knew of the techniques being used" overseas on high-level al Qaeda officials. [Gonzales 8/1/02 memo; WP, 6/27/04; Newsweek, 6/21/04; NYT, 6/27/04]

GONZALES BELIEVES MANY GENEVA CONVENTIONS PROVISIONS ARE OBSOLETE: A 1/25/02 memo written by White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales said "the war against terrorism is a new kind of war" and "this new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions." The memo pushes to make al Qaeda and Taliban detainees exempt from the Geneva Conventions' provisions on the proper, legal treatment of prisoners. The administration has been adamant that prisoners at Guantanamo are not protected by the Geneva Conventions. [Gonzales 1/25/02 memo; Newsweek, 5/24/04]

GONZALES ADMITTED HIS VIEWS 'COULD UNDERMINE U.S. MILITARY CULTURE': The 1/25/02 memo shows Alberto Gonzales was aware of the risk that ignoring the Geneva Conventions could create for the military. One concern expressed is that failing to apply the Geneva Conventions "could undermine U.S. military culture which emphasizes maintaining the highest standards of conduct in combat, and could introduce an element of uncertainty in the status of adversaries," which is what happened at Abu Ghraib. Secretary of State Colin Powell strongly warned against taking this decision, as did lawyers from the Judge Advocate General's Corps, or JAG. This week, a federal judge ruled that "President Bush had both overstepped his constitutional bounds and improperly brushed aside the Geneva Conventions" when he established military tribunals in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to try detainees as war criminals. [Gonzales 1/25/02 memo; Bloomberg, 6/14/04; New York Times, 11/9/04]

GONZALES BLOCKS INFORMATION FROM CONGRESS: Historically, senators have been allowed to review some memoranda by judicial nominees. But, in a letter [about nominee Miguel Estrada], Gonzales told the Democrats that the administration would not produce the memos, because to do so would chill free expression among administration lawyers and violate the principle of executive privilege, which protects the internal deliberations of the president's aides. [New Yorker, 5/19/03]

As Texas Chief Legal Counsel

DEATH PENALTY MEMOS: GONZALES'S NEGLIGENT COUNSEL: As chief legal counsel for then-Gov. Bush in Texas, Gonzales was responsible for writing a memo on the facts of each death penalty case – Bush decided whether a defendant should live or die based on the memos. An examination of the Gonzales memoranda by the Atlantic Monthly concluded, "Gonzales repeatedly failed to apprise the governor of crucial issues in the cases at hand: ineffective counsel, conflict of interest, mitigating evidence, even actual evidence of innocence." His memos caused Bush frequently to approve executions based on "only the most cursory briefings on the issues in dispute." Rather than informing the governor of the conflicting circumstances in a case, "The memoranda seem attuned to a radically different posture, assumed by Bush from the earliest days of his administration—one in which he sought to minimize his sense of legal and moral responsibility for executions." [Atlantic Monthly, July/August, 2003]

MEMORANDUM ON TERRY WASHINGTON: A CASE STUDY IN INCOMPETENCE: In his briefing on death-row defendant Terry Washington – a mentally retarded 33-year-old man with the communication skills of a seven-year-old – Gonzales devoted nearly a third of his three-page report to the gruesome details of the crime, but referred "only fleetingly to the central issue in Washington's clemency appeal—his limited mental capacity, which was never disputed by the State of Texas—and present[ed] it as part of a discussion of 'conflicting information' about the condemned man's childhood." In addition, Gonzales "failed to mention that Washington's mental limitations, and the fact that he and his ten siblings were regularly beaten with whips, water hoses, extension cords, wire hangers, and fan belts, were never made known to the jury, although both the district attorney and Washington's trial lawyer knew of this potentially mitigating evidence." Nor did he mention that Washington's lawyer had "failed to enlist a mental-health expert" to testify on Washington's behalf, even though "ineffective counsel and mental retardation were in fact the central issues raised in the thirty-page clemency petition" it was Gonzales's job to review. This all came at a time when "demand was growing nationwide to ban executions of the retarded." [Atlantic Monthly, July/August, 2003]

GONZALES TOLD GOV. BUSH HE COULD IGNORE INTERNATIONAL LAW: In 1997, Alberto Gonzales wrote a memo for then Gov. Bush to justify non-compliance with the Vienna Convention. The Vienna Convention, ratified by the Senate in 1969, was "designed to ensure that foreign nationals accused of a crime are given access to legal counsel by a representative from their home country." Gonzales sent a letter to the U.S. State Department in which he argued that the treaty didn't apply to the State of Texas, as Texas was not a signatory to the Vienna Convention. Two days later, Texas executed Mexican citizen Irineo Tristan Montoya, despite Mexico's protestations that Texas had violated Tristan's rights under the Vienna Convention by failing to inform the Mexican consulate at the time of his arrest. (Slate, 6/15/04)

GONZALES GETS BUSH OUT OF JURY DUTY TO KEEP DUI SECRET: In 1996, as counsel to Gov. Bush, Gonzales helped to get him excused from jury duty, "a situation that could have required the governor to disclose his then-secret 1976 conviction for drunken driving in Maine." Gonzales argued "that if Bush served, he would not, as governor, be able to pardon the defendant in the future." [USA Today, 3/18/02]

As Texas Supreme Court Justice

GONZALES DOES ENRON'S BIDDING: As an elected member of the Texas Supreme Court, "Enron and Enron's law firm were Gonzales's biggest contributors," giving him $35,450 in 2000. Overall, Gonzales raked in $100,000 from the energy industry. In May 2000, "Gonzales was author of a state Supreme Court opinion that handed the energy industry one of its biggest Texas legal victories in recent history." Since Bush brought him into the White House, Gonzales has worked doggedly to keep secret the details of energy task force meetings held by Vice President Cheney. [New York Daily News, 2/2/02]

ACCEPTING DONATIONS FROM LITIGANTS: In the weeks between hearing oral arguments and making a decision in Henson v. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance, Justice Alberto Gonzales collected a $2,000 contribution premium from the Texas Farm Bureau (which runs the defendant insurance company in this case). In another case, Gonzales pocketed a $2,500 contribution from a law firm defending the Royal Insurance company just before hearing oral arguments in Embrey v. Royal Insurance. [Texas for Public Justice]

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=246536

=======================

USATODAY.com - Bush staff gets subpoenaed on Enron ties
... series of contacts between former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay and several Bush Cabinet
members ... meeting with White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales in which ...

Published on Sunday, July 28, 2002 in the Observer of London
Bush Faces Storm Over 'Enron' Judge
Controversial choice for appeal court accused of favoring big business
by Ed Vulliamy in New York


Open warfare has broken out between the White House and Capitol Hill over President George Bush's most controversial nomination to date to the bench of American high courts.

The nomination of a politically loyal judiciary is the singular way in which US Presidents outlive their terms, leaving an imprint on the nation in the form of judges who can sit on the bench making law for life - and the Bush White House intends Judge Priscilla Owen from Texas to be one such judge.

Bush has intervened to back Owen, and her campaign is being managed - as they all have since her Texas days - by Karl Rove, long-time political organizer for the Bush family and now White House chief adviser.

The Democrat-controlled Senate, however, is fighting her nomination to the powerful fifth circuit Appeals Court, the tier beneath the US Supreme Court.

Senators and a host of organizations petitioning their judiciary committee say Owen has used the bench to advance a a zealous right-wing ideology, contesting the right to abortion and favoring big oil and energy companies, including the disgraced Enron, which has been one of her - and the President's - biggest financial backers.

They are in turn accused by the White House of detonating a 'judicial crisis'.

The committee's chairman, Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont, particularly demanded that the White House 'look into' Owen's Enron connection, after being passed a report by a research group, Texans for Public Justice, detailing the firm's contributions, after which she ruled in their and other donors' interests many times.

In one instance she wrote an opinion overturning another court, exempting Enron from paying school taxes. The director of another group, Nan Aron of the Alliance for Justice, said: 'Mention her name and people say "Oh, Judge Enron".'

'I would just say,' said Texans for Public Justice's Craig McDonald, 'that as far as those of us who have watched Priscilla Owen, Karl Rove and George W. Bush for a lot of years are concerned, this is the one that deserves to be controversial. This is not a Texas fight or a fifth circuit fight; this is a struggle to determine whether a political operative, Karl Rove, and his crew are going to determine the make-up of the federal courts'.

So far as some senators are concerned, the most controversial rulings Owen made in Texas were in about a dozen cases concerning abortion, and a legal obligation that minors receive parental consent before terminating a pregnancy.

Those rulings have made abortion an issue for the first time in the selection of a high court judge. Although the right to abortion is enshrined in US law, its eventual abolition is one of Rove's dearest causes. He recently addressed the Christian Conservative Family Research Council, saying: 'We need to find ways to win this war.'

In the Texas courts, a girl can appeal against the obligation if she can show that telling her parents might harm her, as happened in most Texas cases. But Owen, dissenting, ruled throughout that the question was not whether telling parents would harm the child, but having the abortion at all.

Minors, she said, should have to demonstrate to the court 'that philosophic, social, moral and religious arguments can be brought to bear' on abortions, in addition to those enshrined into law, which concern mainly health risks.

'It was nothing to do with telling parents,' said McDonald, 'she was trying to stop these minors from having an abortion, which is something very different.'

Herein lies a twist to Owen's nomination. One of her cheerleaders on Capitol Hill last week was White House counsel Alberto Gonzales. He joined the Texas Supreme Court when Bush was state Governor, then was elevated to Washington and tipped to be the next judge to take a seat on the bench of the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court.

And yet, when Owen was overruled in trying to stop an abortion in 2000, even her colleague on the bench, Gonzales, protested that to follow her lead 'would be an unconscionable act of judicial activism'.

A legal watchdog, People for the American Way, argues that Owen indulges in 'activist' lawmaking which establishes law rather than interpret it. 'President Bush has said he wants judges who will interpret the law, not make it,' said the group's director, Ralph Neas. 'In Priscilla Owen, he has found the exact opposite.'

© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0728-01.htm
------------------------------------------------------

CONNECT THE DOTS....BUSH/ENRON....

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/enron_bush.htm



Main Page -  11/11/04

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)