... "Listen, we've never been stay the course, George,"
President Bush told George Stephanopoulos of ABC News...
OPERATION STAY THE COURSE
AUDIO: MSNBC COUNTDOWN
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/L001I061027-stay-the-course.MP3
From the Magazine | Nation
The G.O.P.'s Secret Weapon
You think the Republicans are sure to lose big in November? They
aren't. Here's why things don't look so bad to them
By MIKE ALLEN, JAMES CARNEY
Posted Sunday, Oct. 1, 2006
The polls keep suggesting that Republicans could be in for a
historic drubbing. And their usual advantage--competence on
national security--is constantly being challenged by new
revelations about bungling in Iraq. But top Republican officials
maintain an eerie, Zen-like calm. They insist that the prospects
for their congressional candidates in November's midterms have
never been as bad as advertised and are getting better by the
day. Those are party operatives and political savants whose job
it is to anticipate trouble. But much of the time they seem so
placid, you wonder whether they know something.
They do. What they know is that just six days after George W.
Bush won re-election in 2004, his political machine launched a
sophisticated, expensive and largely unnoticed campaign aimed at
maintaining G.O.P. majorities in the House and Senate. If that
campaign succeeds, it would defy history and political gravity,
both of which ordain that midterm elections are bad news for a
lame-duck President's party, especially when the lame duck has
low approval ratings. As always, a key part of the campaign
involves money--the national Republican Party is dumping at
least three times as much into key states as its Democratic
counterpart is--but money is only the start. "Panic results when
you're surprised," says Republican National Committee (R.N.C.)
chairman Ken Mehlman. "We've been preparing for the toughest
election in at least a decade."
Thanks to aggressive redistricting in the 1990s and early 2000s,
fewer than three dozen House seats are seriously in contention
this election cycle, compared with more than 100 in 1994, the
year Republicans swept to power with a 54-seat pickup in the
House. Then there's what political pros call the ground game.
For most of the 20th century, turning out voters on Election Day
was the Democrats' strength. They had labor unions to supply
workers for campaigns, make sure their voters had time off from
their jobs to go to the polls and provide rides to get them
there.
Now, though, Democrats are the ones playing catch-up when it
comes to the mechanics of Election Day. Every Monday,
überstrategist Karl Rove and Republican Party officials on
Capitol Hill get spreadsheets tallying the numbers of voters
registered, volunteers recruited, doors knocked on and phone
numbers dialed for 40 House campaigns and a dozen Senate races.
Over the next few weeks, the party will begin flying experienced
paid and volunteer workers into states for the final push. The
Senate Republicans' campaign committee calls its agents special
teams, led by marshals, all in the service of the partywide
effort known as the 72-Hour Task Force because its working
philosophy initially focused on the final three days before an
election.
So Republicans hope to close the deal in tight races with a
get-out-the-vote strategy that was developed in the wreckage of
the 2000 presidential campaign. Bush's team was led then, as it
is now, by Rove, Bush's political architect and now White House
deputy chief of staff, and Mehlman, then White House
political-affairs director. Their theory was that Bush lost 3%
or 4% of his expected vote in 2000 because those people just
stayed home.
What Rove and Mehlman wanted to figure out was the code for
increasing the number of Republican voters who could be reliably
summoned to the polls--a code that, once cracked, could be used
to win election after election. "We want to turn 75%-Republican
areas into 78%- or 79%-Republican areas while at the same time
turning 15% areas into 18% or 19% areas," says Mike DuHaime,
political director of the R.N.C.
In the off year of 2001, the creators of the 72-Hour program
tested it in odd, lower-profile contests, including court races
in Pennsylvania. The Bushies picked clusters of precincts where
they quietly tried their new methods, then compared those with
similar precincts where the campaigns did things the more
traditional way. Those experiments helped Republicans develop a
handful of precepts that constitute the party's playbook for
this fall:
1. Learn from the past Fifteen G.O.P. data experts spent months
after the '04 election comparing turnout records from the swing
states with the Bush-Cheney campaign's databases to figure out
the optimal amount of mail, phone calls and door knocks that
would persuade a probable G.O.P. voter to go to the polls.
2. Draw in new voters The Bush-Cheney campaign used state
records to locate potential Republicans with Florida State
University license plates, then had fellow Seminoles call them
to sound out their views. Whereas parties used to go after
certain precincts or ZIP codes, Republicans now know even which
individual households they want through microtargeting--the use
of computerized consumer data, from magazine subscriptions to
charitable contributions, to help locate voters who are likely
to vote Republican if they turn out. Other telltale signs of
potential latent Republicanism are snowmobile ownership and
enrollment in private schools.
3. Low tech can be better Caller ID, TiVo, cable channels and
satellite radio all make it harder to reach voters than it was
just a few years ago, increasing the importance of
person-to-person appeals, the hallmark of old-fashioned,
grassroots campaigns that used to connote an amateur or a low
budget. "You clearly have to have TV ads," says White House
political-affairs director Sara Taylor, "but for a little less
TV, you can buy a whole lot of pizzas and phone lines and
salaries for young men and women right out of college" to make
phone calls, knock on doors and recruit and manage volunteers.
4. Details, details The shopping list includes everything from
chairs to cell phones for hundreds of workers for Republican
Party victory committees, whose staffs are charged with creating
state turnout machines. The G.O.P. says their volunteer forces
in '04 proved to be more effective than the paid workers
contracted by Democrats, unions and Democrat- oriented
fund-raising groups. Even Election Day comes sooner for
Republicans, who have begun putting a huge effort into locking
down absentee voters and vote-by-mail ballots in states that use
them.
5. Spend more Republican officials estimate that at the end of
August, their committees and campaigns had $235 million to spend
in the two-month home stretch, a $58 million advantage over
Democrats. The R.N.C. plans to lay out more than $60 million on
turnout efforts and advertising vs. the more than $14 million
set aside by Democratic National Committee (D.N.C.) chairman
Howard Dean. Senator Hillary Clinton of New York, who has been
critical of Dean's approach, complained at a D.N.C. fund-raising
luncheon in Washington last week that the G.O.P. "is pouring
tens of millions of dollars into races, and we're not matching
that." House Republican officials contend that many of their
Democratic challengers are so little known that they could be
buried in an ad blitz. "You hit them, and they fold like a house
of cards," a strategist said.
Republicans had begun to feel better about the election recently
after Bush got a bump in the polls, reflecting a steady decline
in gas prices and a successful effort by the White House to push
national-security issues to the top of the news. But by last
week G.O.P. operatives were less elated. Newscasts were
trumpeting the tales of infighting in Bush's war cabinet told in
Bob Woodward's State of Denial, a book full of stories about an
Administration pursuing a war with no clue how to go about it.
And Representative Mark Foley, a Republican from Florida,
resigned after his X-rated Internet chats with teenage boys from
the House page program were made public. A safe seat for
Republicans was suddenly in jeopardy.
Republicans acknowledge one ominous vulnerability: for more than
a decade, the party has benefited from an intensity gap. Stoked
by hatred of Bill Clinton or love for George W. Bush, G.O.P.
voters have been more certain to vote than Democrats--meaning
that the party tends to perform better than the final opinion
polls suggest. Representative Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, head of
the House Democrats' campaign committee, recently told TIME that
gap had counted for as much as 5 to 7 points for the
Republicans. But he thinks this election year might be
different. "Their voters are unhappy," he says. "They're
despondent about a failed President."
White House officials also concede they aren't so sure that
Republicans will be motivated to go to the polls this year. Of
course, expressions of doubt on the part of senior Republicans
could be part of another game the G.O.P. plays better than the
Democrats do these days: the expectations game. The Republicans
are, after all, in the enviable position of being able to lose a
lot. As long as they end up keeping control of both houses, they
still come out the winner on Election Day.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1541295-1,00.html
__._,_.___
APFN-1 YahooGroups:
Subscribe:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apfn-1/join
Unsubscribe: apfn-1-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
APFN MSG BOARD:
`In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.'
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html
APFN CONTENTS PAGE:
http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm
"RADIO YOUR WAY" APFN POGO NETWORK (( WOW!! ))
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of
good conscience to remain silent" -- Thomas Jefferson
http://www.apfn.net/POGO.HTM
Find elected officials, including the president, members of
Congress, governors, state legislators, local officials, and
more.
http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/
SUPPORT APFN
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/kenvardon.htm