Patti Woodard
voter fraud
Wed Nov 2, 2005 23:19
216.99.219.101
http://groups.msn.com/votefraudusa/3.msnw
Howard Dean and Bev Harris, who has been going after the vote fraud since the beginning have proven on tape how easy it was to hack into the Diebold system and change the votes.,,,,,,,,,Yep,,,,,no wonder the GAO is finally looking into all this. For the bushbackers who refuse to believe any of this, think of it this way. Howard Dean, the Chairman of the DNC now knows how it was pulled off. Are you people interested in fixing this problem now? If not, stay tuned next year when you may be on the receiving end of the fraud instead of the "others" who you cared nothing about to even learn it was real all along.
We gave reports of the "swap out" in strong democratic counties if there were 70% Democrats and 30% Republicans, Kerry got 30% of the votes and Bush ended up with the 70%. We showed that there were counties where there were more votes than registered voters. We tried to get people interested in this, not because Kerry lost, but because this is our voice. This is the key to our democracy. Without trust in the electoral process, we are no longer a true democracy. We told you how money was being funneled into races illegally and now it is going through the courts. We tried over and over again to say that just because it worked in the favor of those who wanted Bush, that did not mean it would always go that way in the future. Let's face it. Democrats have been called "geeks" for a very long time now and we do know computers like the back of our hands. It really wouldn't take very long for us to get as devious as the republicans and pull the same trick ourselves. Well, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee now knows how it was pulled off and if that is not enough to get everyone in this country in fixing this system, nothing will. Not the dirty money laundering that DeLay is now facing court time on, or the rest of the ones who have already gone to court over their frauds has been enough for every single voter in this country to hit the roof, maybe this will.
Think about Diebold itself. When you use an ATM, the manufacture tag is Diebold. The banks don't trust the machines enough to not print out a receipt and neither would you. This print out leaves a paper trail not just for you, but for the bank as well. Every slip is also printed into a data bank within the bank. They know where every dime went. It is called checks and balances simply because of human error and human greed as well. Tellers have to balance at the end of the day and so do the machines.
Now the same company who manages to handle hundreds of thousands of transactions per hour can print out a paper trail in two ends of the banking process. So why wouldn't the same company be able to manage doing the same thing with our votes? The answer is, it can but it doesn't. Without the paper trail on both ends, nothing is hack proof. Bev Harris just not only proved it, she taught Howard Dean how it was done.
Consider where you shop. The slip you are handed for what you purchased has a bunch of numbers on it. Those numbers tell the manager what you bought and how much you paid for it. It also tells the manager how much money was made at the end of the day on that register. Everything has to add up or they have a problem. It gets added up to the total in the cash drawer as well as the total of the reported sales. Ok, now go backwards. Every single item that is in that store is in a data base on stock reports. The stock reports not only tell the managers where things are, but how much they have of an item on hand, how many they got in, when they got it in and where it came from. Those figures are hooked up to another data base which shows how many were ordered, how many came in and what was paid for them. Every store has a multi-linked data base to make sure that everything adds up. This is how they know if they have a theft problem with customers or employees, or even by companies they do business with. Checks and balances from multiple sources. Well the election used to work the same way. The data bases would take the number of people registered to vote, how many checked in and how many checked out. This way they knew how many ballots they would end up with at the end of the day. More votes than voters, there is a problem, or the other way around. Those figures are checked against the number of registered voters in that precinct. Over the amount, again there is a problem.
This didn't happen in the last election. Now are you interested?
Kathie Costos
Namguardianangel@aol.com
www.Namguardianangel.org
http://namguardianangel.blogspot.com
http://journals.aol.com/namguardianangel/media
http://hometown.aol.com/namguardianangel/KathieCostosindex.html
http://hometown.aol.com/namguardianangel/fortheloveofjackindex.html
Howard Dean and Bev Harris, who has been going after the vote fraud since the beginning have proven on tape how easy it was to hack into the Diebold system and change the votes.,,,,,,,,,Yep,,,,,no wonder the GAO is finally looking into all this. For the bushbackers who refuse to believe any of this, think of it this way. Howard Dean, the Chairman of the DNC now knows how it was pulled off. Are you people interested in fixing this problem now? If not, stay tuned next year when you may be on the receiving end of the fraud instead of the "others" who you cared nothing about to even learn it was real all along.
We gave reports of the "swap out" in strong democratic counties if there were 70% Democrats and 30% Republicans, Kerry got 30% of the votes and Bush ended up with the 70%. We showed that there were counties where there were more votes than registered voters. We tried to get people interested in this, not because Kerry lost, but because this is our voice. This is the key to our democracy. Without trust in the electoral process, we are no longer a true democracy. We told you how money was being funneled into races illegally and now it is going through the courts. We tried over and over again to say that just because it worked in the favor of those who wanted Bush, that did not mean it would always go that way in the future. Let's face it. Democrats have been called "geeks" for a very long time now and we do know computers like the back of our hands. It really wouldn't take very long for us to get as devious as the republicans and pull the same trick ourselves. Well, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee now knows how it was pulled off and if that is not enough to get everyone in this country in fixing this system, nothing will. Not the dirty money laundering that DeLay is now facing court time on, or the rest of the ones who have already gone to court over their frauds has been enough for every single voter in this country to hit the roof, maybe this will.
Think about Diebold itself. When you use an ATM, the manufacture tag is Diebold. The banks don't trust the machines enough to not print out a receipt and neither would you. This print out leaves a paper trail not just for you, but for the bank as well. Every slip is also printed into a data bank within the bank. They know where every dime went. It is called checks and balances simply because of human error and human greed as well. Tellers have to balance at the end of the day and so do the machines.
Now the same company who manages to handle hundreds of thousands of transactions per hour can print out a paper trail in two ends of the banking process. So why wouldn't the same company be able to manage doing the same thing with our votes? The answer is, it can but it doesn't. Without the paper trail on both ends, nothing is hack proof. Bev Harris just not only proved it, she taught Howard Dean how it was done.
Consider where you shop. The slip you are handed for what you purchased has a bunch of numbers on it. Those numbers tell the manager what you bought and how much you paid for it. It also tells the manager how much money was made at the end of the day on that register. Everything has to add up or they have a problem. It gets added up to the total in the cash drawer as well as the total of the reported sales. Ok, now go backwards. Every single item that is in that store is in a data base on stock reports. The stock reports not only tell the managers where things are, but how much they have of an item on hand, how many they got in, when they got it in and where it came from. Those figures are hooked up to another data base which shows how many were ordered, how many came in and what was paid for them. Every store has a multi-linked data base to make sure that everything adds up. This is how they know if they have a theft problem with customers or employees, or even by companies they do business with. Checks and balances from multiple sources. Well the election used to work the same way. The data bases would take the number of people registered to vote, how many checked in and how many checked out. This way they knew how many ballots they would end up with at the end of the day. More votes than voters, there is a problem, or the other way around. Those figures are checked against the number of registered voters in that precinct. Over the amount, again there is a problem.
This didn't happen in the last election. Now are you interested?
Kathie Costos
Namguardianangel@aol.com
www.Namguardianangel.org
http://namguardianangel.blogspot.com
http://journals.aol.com/namguardianangel/media
http://hometown.aol.com/namguardianangel/KathieCostosindex.html
http://hometown.aol.com/namguardianangel/fortheloveofjackindex.html
- VoteGate 2004 Powerpoint Presentation/Movie —VoteGate, Thu Nov 3 01:31
Main Page - Thursday, 11/03/05
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
