Justice Dept. Memo Says Torture 'May Be Justified'
By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 13, 2004; 6:30 PM
SOURCE:
Today washingtonpost.com is posting a copy of the
Aug. 1, 2002, memorandum (PDF) "Re: Standards of Conduct for
Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. 2340-2340A," from the Justice
Department's Office of Legal Counsel for Alberto R. Gonzales,
counsel to President Bush.
The memo was the focus of a recent article in The Washington
Post.
The memo was written at the request of the CIA. The CIA wanted
authority to conduct more aggressive interrogations than were
permitted prior to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The
interrogations were of suspected al Qaeda members whom the CIA
had apprehended outside the United States. The CIA asked the
White House for legal guidance. The White House asked the
Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel for its legal
opinion on the standards of conduct under the Convention Against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment or
Punishment.
The Office of Legal Counsel is the federal government's ultimate
legal adviser. The most significant and sensitive topics that
the federal government considers are often given to the OLC for
review. In this case, the memorandum was signed by Jay S. Bybee,
the head of the office at the time. Bybee's signature gives the
document additional authority, making it akin to a binding legal
opinion on government policy on interrogations. Bybee has since
become a judge on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Another memorandum, dated March 6, 2003, from a Defense
Department working group convened by Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld to come up with new interrogation guidelines for
detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, incorporated much, but not
all, of the legal thinking from the OLC memo. The Wall Street
Journal first published the March memo.
At a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, senators asked
Attorney General John D. Ashcroft to release both memos.
Ashcroft said he would not discuss the contents of the Justice
and Pentagon memos or turn them over to the committees. A
transcript of that hearing is also available.
President Bush spoke on the issue of torture Thursday, saying he
expected U.S. authorities to abide by the law. He declined to
say whether he believes U.S. law prohibits torture. Here is a
link to the transcript of the president's press conference,
which included questions and answers on torture.
The Post deleted several lines from the memo that are not
germane to the legal arguments being made in it and that are the
subject of further reporting by The Post.
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
==================================
At 02:34 PM 10/28/2005, you wrote:
> Sorry to have brothered you about this matter.... I won't do
it again....
Just so there is no misunderstanding, here. This is NOT about
how "this matter bothers me." It is not about me. It is about
what should be fair, reasonable, and about the rule of law,
which surpasses individual offenses or irritations or any
biases. It is about civility versus barbarism. Afterall, your
forum is about exposing corruption and allowing people to choose
to make things right, isn't it? and not about promoting what is
wrong, immoral and injudicious, right?
ac - acfree@earthlink.net
> Democracy Now!
>
> CLICK: The Former Head of Abu Ghraib, Admits She Broke the
Geneva Conventions:
>
> Says the Blame "Goes All the Way to The Top”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10786.htm
Abusive Correspondence: Send any abusive rants you might have
to: president@whitehouse.gov
Architects of torture
'Nuremburg Reborn'
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/england2.htm