Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
Written by Frank Morales
Thursday, 26 October 2006
In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into
law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick
Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President
to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by
revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits
the President's ability to deploy troops within the
United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335)
has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18
U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on
military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With
one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo
those prohibitions.
Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense
Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was
signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006,
in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President
to declare a "public emergency" and station troops
anywhere in America and take control of state-based
National Guard units without the consent of the governor
or local authorities, in order to "suppress public
disorder."
President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the
very same day that he signed the equally odious Military
Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws
complement one another. One allows for torture and
detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce
acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military
onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for
putting an area under military law enforcement control
is precise; the term is "martial law."
Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which
grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its
ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed
Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section 333, "Major
public emergencies; interference with State and Federal
law" states that "the President may employ the armed
forces, including the National Guard in Federal service,
to restore public order and enforce the laws of the
United States when, as a result of a natural disaster,
epidemic, or other serious public health emergency,
terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any
State or possession of the United States, the President
determines that domestic violence has occurred to such
an extent that the constituted authorities of the State
or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in)
maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any
State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful
combination, or conspiracy."
For the current President, "enforcement of the laws to
restore public order" means to commandeer guardsmen from
any state, over the objections of local governmental,
military and local police entities; ship them off to
another state; conscript them in a law enforcement mode;
and set them loose against "disorderly" citizenry -
protesters, possibly, or those who object to forced
vaccinations and quarantines in the event of a
bio-terror event.
The law also facilitates militarized police round-ups
and detention of protesters, so called "illegal aliens,"
"potential terrorists" and other "undesirables" for
detention in facilities already contracted for and under
construction by Halliburton. That's right. Under the
cover of a trumped-up "immigration emergency" and the
frenzied militarization of the southern border,
detention camps are being constructed right under our
noses, camps designed for anyone who resists the foreign
and domestic agenda of the Bush administration.
An article on "recent contract awards" in a recent issue
of the slick, insider "Journal of Counterterrorism &
Homeland Security International" reported that "global
engineering and technical services powerhouse KBR [Kellog,
Brown & Root] announced in January 2006 that its
Government and Infrastructure division was awarded an
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract
to support U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) facilities in the event of an emergency." "With a
maximum total value of $385 million over a five year
term," the report notes, "the contract is to be executed
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers," "for establishing
temporary detention and processing capabilities to
augment existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO)
- in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into
the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new
programs." The report points out that "KBR is the
engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton."
(3) So, in addition to authorizing another $532.8
billion for the Pentagon, including a $70-billion
"supplemental provision" which covers the cost of the
ongoing, mad military maneuvers in Iraq, Afghanistan,
and other places, the new law, signed by the president
in a private White House ceremony, further collapses the
historic divide between the police and the military: a
tell-tale sign of a rapidly consolidating police state
in America, all accomplished amidst ongoing U.S.
imperial pretensions of global domination, sold to an
"emergency managed" and seemingly willfully gullible
public as a "global war on terrorism."
Make no mistake about it: the de-facto repeal of the
Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) is an ominous assault on
American democratic tradition and jurisprudence. The
1878 Act, which reads, "Whoever, except in cases and
under circumstances expressly authorized by the
Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part
of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or
otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both,"
is the only U.S. criminal statute that outlaws military
operations directed against the American people under
the cover of 'law enforcement.' As such, it has been the
best protection we've had against the power-hungry
intentions of an unscrupulous and reckless executive, an
executive intent on using force to enforce its will.
Unfortunately, this past week, the president dealt posse
comitatus, along with American democracy, a near fatal
blow. Consequently, it will take an aroused citizenry to
undo the damage wrought by this horrendous act, part and
parcel, as we have seen, of a long train of abuses and
outrages perpetrated by this authoritarian
administration.
Despite the unprecedented and shocking nature of this
act, there has been no outcry in the American media, and
little reaction from our elected officials in Congress.
On September 19th, a lone Senator Patrick Leahy
(D-Vermont) noted that 2007's Defense Authorization Act
contained a "widely opposed provision to allow the
President more control over the National Guard
[adopting] changes to the Insurrection Act, which will
make it easier for this or any future President to use
the military to restore domestic order WITHOUT the
consent of the nation's governors."
Senator Leahy went on to stress that, "we certainly do
not need to make it easier for Presidents to declare
martial law. Invoking the Insurrection Act and using the
military for law enforcement activities goes against
some of the central tenets of our democracy. One can
easily envision governors and mayors in charge of an
emergency having to constantly look over their shoulders
while someone who has never visited their communities
gives the orders."
A few weeks later, on the 29th of September, Leahy
entered into the Congressional Record that he had "grave
reservations about certain provisions of the fiscal Year
2007 Defense Authorization Bill Conference Report," the
language of which, he said, "subverts solid,
longstanding posse comitatus statutes that limit the
military's involvement in law enforcement, thereby
making it easier for the President to declare martial
law." This had been "slipped in," Leahy said, "as a
rider with little study," while "other congressional
committees with jurisdiction over these matters had no
chance to comment, let alone hold hearings on, these
proposals."
In a telling bit of understatement, the Senator from
Vermont noted that "the implications of changing the
(Posse Comitatus) Act are enormous". "There is good
reason," he said, "for the constructive friction in
existing law when it comes to martial law declarations.
Using the military for law enforcement goes against one
of the founding tenets of our democracy. We fail our
Constitution, neglecting the rights of the States, when
we make it easier for the President to declare martial
law and trample on local and state sovereignty."
Senator Leahy's final ruminations: "Since hearing word a
couple of weeks ago that this outcome was likely, I have
wondered how Congress could have gotten to this point.
It seems the changes to the Insurrection Act have
survived the Conference because the Pentagon and the
White House want it."
The historic and ominous re-writing of the Insurrection
Act, accomplished in the dead of night, which gives Bush
the legal authority to declare martial law, is now an
accomplished fact.
The Pentagon, as one might expect, plays an even more
direct role in martial law operations. Title XIV of the
new law, entitled, "Homeland Defense Technology Transfer
Legislative Provisions," authorizes "the Secretary of
Defense to create a Homeland Defense Technology Transfer
Consortium to improve the effectiveness of the
Department of Defense (DOD) processes for identifying
and deploying relevant DOD technology to federal, State,
and local first responders."
In other words, the law facilitates the "transfer" of
the newest in so-called "crowd control" technology and
other weaponry designed to suppress dissent from the
Pentagon to local militarized police units. The new law
builds on and further codifies earlier "technology
transfer" agreements, specifically the 1995 DOD-Justice
Department memorandum of agreement achieved back during
the Clinton-Reno regime.(4)
It has become clear in recent months that a critical
mass of the American people have seen through the lies
of the Bush administration; with the president's polls
at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in
mid-term elections, the Bush administration is on the
ropes. And so it is particularly worrying that President
Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator.
Source:
(1)
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200609/091906a.html
and
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200609/092906b.html
See also, Congressional Research Service Report for
Congress, "The Use of Federal Troops for Disaster
Assistance: Legal Issues," by Jennifer K. Elsea,
Legislative Attorney, August 14, 2006
(2)
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill+h109-5122
(3) Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security
International, "Recent Contract Awards", Summer 2006,
Vol.12, No.2, pg.8; See also, Peter Dale Scott,
"Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention
Camps," New American Media, January 31, 2006.
(4) "Technology Transfer from defense: Concealed Weapons
Detection", National Institute of Justice Journal, No
229, August, 1995, pp.42-43.
Photo source:

=============
see:
HTTP://WWW.APFN.ORG/APFN/MCA.HTM