Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04
Submitted by Sussel on Sun, 2005-10-23 17:54. Media
Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04
By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 23, 2005; Page A05
Weeks after he took over the investigation 22 months ago into
the
unauthorized disclosure of a CIA operative's identity, special
counsel
Patrick J. Fitzgerald got authority from the Justice Department
to expand
his inquiry to include any criminal attempts to interfere with
his probe,
according to a letter posted Friday on Fitzgerald's new Web
site.
Full article
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/3936
__________________________________________________________________________
(thanks to Harmon for sending this:)
You can keep track of Fitzgerald's indictments on :
www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/index.html ]
Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04
Submitted by Sussel on Sun, 2005-10-23 17:54. Media
Letter Shows Authority to Expand CIA Leak Probe Was Given in '04
By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 23, 2005; Page A05
Weeks after he took over the investigation 22 months ago into
the unauthorized disclosure of a CIA operative's identity,
special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald got authority from the
Justice Department to expand his inquiry to include any criminal
attempts to interfere with his probe, according to a letter
posted Friday on Fitzgerald's new Web site.
Fitzgerald is nearing a decision on whether he will prosecute
anyone when the federal grand jury term ends Friday. The letter
specified that he could investigate and prosecute "perjury,
obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence and intimidation
of witnesses."
According to a lawyer familiar with the case, the current
speculation about such charges eventually arising appeared to
have occurred to Fitzgerald in the first months of his inquiry.
In a letter dated Feb. 6, 2004, then-Deputy Attorney General
James B. Comey said that he was clarifying, "at your
[Fitzgerald's] request," the added authority to investigate and
prosecute "crimes committed with intent to interfere with your
investigation." Fitzgerald's appointment as special counsel on
Dec. 30, 2003, after then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft
recused himself, gave him specific authority to investigate "the
alleged unauthorized disclosure of a CIA employee's identity,"
according to another letter from Comey posted on the Web site.
"The fact that he [Fitzgerald] asked for authority that he
probably already had, but wanted spelled out, makes it arguable
that he had run into something rather quickly," Washington
lawyer Plato Cacheris said yesterday.
The investigation was triggered by a July 14, 2003, syndicated
column by Robert D. Novak in which he identified Valerie Plame
as a CIA operative. Plame's husband, former U.S. ambassador
Joseph C. Wilson IV, had been sent to Niger to check whether
Iraq was trying to get uranium from that country. Novak wrote
that two senior administration officials had suggested that
Wilson's wife had proposed him for the trip.
After Novak's column appeared, the CIA notified the Justice
Department that publication of Plame's name and CIA employment
was an unauthorized leak of classified information. The CIA then
looked into whether the disclosure had caused damage to Plame
and to people familiar with Plame and her job at the agency. The
CIA's report went to the Justice Department, which determined in
late September 2003 that a criminal investigation of the leak
should be initiated.
Ashcroft recused himself because the inquiry would focus on
White House personnel. Comey then named Fitzgerald, a highly
regarded prosecutor and the U.S. attorney in northern Illinois,
as special counsel.
From the start, the inquiry focused on a potential violation of
a federal statute that prohibits the disclosure of the name of a
covert CIA operative. Then the inquiry began looking at whether
a conspiracy developed within the top levels of the Bush White
House to leak Plame's name to discredit Wilson because of his
statements criticizing the administration's use of intelligence
in the buildup to the war in Iraq.
The possibility of perjury or obstruction charges emerged more
recently, after the publication of reports on the testimony of
journalists who said they were told about Plame either by White
House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove or by I. Lewis "Scooter"
Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff.
LINK TO ORIGINAL
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/22/AR2005102201113.html