US Domestic Covert Operations
From the Archive: WAR AT HOME (2/5)
From: yibgle@cts.com (Gary Lee)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 14:20:26 GMT
Organization: The Gloons of Tharf
Newsgroups: alt.society.anarchy
http://mediafilter.org/MFF/USDCO.idx.html
Anyone who doubts that the government is capable of
using agents provocateurs to plant phony requests for
bomb-making information in this newsgroup as a pretext
for censoring the entire net (or that it is capable of
much worse if that fails) should take a glance at the
following articles. These posts also contain much that
should be of interest to anyone thinking about joining
or starting any kind of anarchist direct-action campaign
or organization. Gary /** pn.publiceye: 23.5 **/ **
Written 6:49 pm Jan 24, 1991 by nlgclc in
cdp:pn.publiceye ** SUPPORT THIS SITE!
GET THE BOOK:
"POLICE STATE AMERICA--US MILITARY CIVIL DISTURBANCE
LANNING"
How COINTELPRO Helped Destroy
the Movements of the 1960s
Since COINTELPRO was used mainly against the progressive
movements of the 1960s, its impact can be grasped only
in the context of the momentous social upheaval which
shook the country during those years.
The Anti-war and New Left Movements:
Government covert action against the New Left and
anti-war movements also persisted, especially as
activists mobilized to protest the 1972 Republican and
Democratic Party conventions. In San Diego, where the
Republicans initially planned to convene, this campaign
culminated in the January 6, 1972 attempt on the life of
anti-convention organizer Peter Bohmer by a "Secret Army
Organization" of ex-Minutemen formed, subsidized, armed,
and protected by the FBI.
The Labor Movement:
One of agent provocateur Joe Burton's main targets was
the United Electrical Workers Union (UE). The FBI
falsified records to get Burton into UE Tampa Local 1201
soon after its successful 1973 organizing drive upset
the Westinghouse Corporation's plan to develop a chain
of non-union plants in the South. Burton's attacks on
genuine activists repeatedly disrupted UE meetings. His
ultra-left proclamations in the union's name antagonized
newly organized workers and gave credibility to the
company's red-baiting. Burton also helped the FBI move
against the United Farm Workers and the American
Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).
Harassment Through - Psychological Warfare
While boring from within, the FBI and police also attack
dissident movements from the outside. They openly mount
propaganda campaigns through public addresses, news
releases, books, pamphlets, magazine articles, radio,
and television. They also use covert deception and
manipulation. Documented tactics of this kind include:
The Chicano and Puerto Rican Movements:
From 1972-1974,
La Raza Unida Party of Texas was plagued with repeated,
unsolved COINTELPRO-style political break-ins. Former
government operative Eustacio "Frank" Martinez has
admitted that after the close of COINTELPRO, the U.S.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) paid him
to help destroy La Casa de Carnalsimo, a Chicano
community anti-drug program in Los Angeles. Martinez,
who had previously infiltrated the Brown Berets and the
Chicano Moratorium, stated that the ATF directed him to
provoke bombings and plant a drug pusher in La Casa.
======================
I. Introduction
A. Explanation of Purpose
This manual cannot teach anyone how to be, or become, a
good interrogator. At best it can help readers to avoid
the characteristic mistakes of poor interrogators.
Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK
interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence
interrogation of resistant sources. Designed as an aid
for interrogators and others immediately concerned, it
is based largely upon the published results of extensive
research, including scientific inquiries conducted by
specialists in closely related subjects.
There is nothing mysterious about interrogation. It
consists of no more than obtaining needed information
through responses to questions. As is true of all
craftsmen, some interrogators are more able than others;
and some of their superiority may be innate. But sound
interrogation nevertheless rests upon a knowledge of the
subject matter and on certain broad principles, chiefly
psychological, which are not hard to understand. The
success of good interrogators depends in large measure
upon their use, conscious or not, of these principles
and of processes and techniques deriving from them.
Knowledge of subject matter and of the basic principles
will not of itself create a successful interrogation,
but it will make possible the avoidance of mistakes that
are characteristic of poor interrogation. The purpose,
then, is not to teach the reader how to be a good
interrogator but rather to tell him what he must learn
in order to become a good interrogator.
1 [page break]
The interrogation of a resistant source who is a staff
or agent member of an Orbit intelligence or security
service or of a clandestine Communist organization is
one of the most exacting of professional tasks. Usually
the odds still favor the interrogator, but they are
sharply cut by the training, experience, patience and
toughness of the interrogatee. In such circumstances the
interrogator needs all the help that he can get. And a
principal source of aid today is scientific findings.
The intelligence service which is able to bring
pertinent, modern knowledge to bear upon its problems
enjoys huge advantages over a service which conducts its
clandestine business in eighteenth century fashion. It
is true that American psychologists have devoted
somewhat more attention to Communist interrogation
techniques, particularly "brainwashing", than to U. S.
practices. Yet they have conducted scientific inquiries
into many subjects that are closely related to
interrogation: the effects of debility and isolation,
the polygraph, reactions to pain and fear, hypnosis and
heightened suggestibility, narcosis, etc. This work is
of sufficient importance and relevance that it is no
longer possible to discuss interrogation significantly
without reference to the psychological research
conducted in the past decade. For this reason a major
purpose of this study is to focus relevant scientific
findings upon CI interrogation. Every effort has been
made to report and interpret these findings in our own
language, in place of the terminology employed by the
psychologists.
This study is by no means confined to a resume and
interpretation of psychological findings. The approach
of the psychologists is customarily manipulative; that
is, they suggest methods of imposing controls or
alterations upon the interrogatee from the outside.
Except within the Communist frame of reference, they
have paid less attention to the creation of internal
controls -- i.e., conversion of the source, so that
voluntary cooperation results. Moral considerations
aside, the imposition of external techniques of
manipulating people carries with it the grave risk of
later lawsuits, adverse publicity, or other attempts to
strike back.
2 [page break]
B. Explanation of Organization
This study moves from the general topic of interrogation
per se (Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI) to planning the
counterintelligence interrogation (Part VII) to the CI
interrogation of resistant sources (Parts VIII, IX, and
X). The definitions, legal considerations, and
discussions of interrogators and sources, as well as
Section VI on screening and other preliminaries, are
relevant to all kinds of interrogations. Once it is
established that the source is probably a
counterintelligence target (in other words, is probably
a member of a foreign intelligence or security service,
a Communist, or a part of any other group engaged in
clandestine activity directed against the national
security), the interrogation is planned and conducted
accordingly. The CI interrogation techniques are
discussed in an order of increasing intensity as the
focus on source resistance grows sharper. The last
section, on do's and dont's, is a return to the broader
view of the opening parts; as a check-list, it is placed
last solely for convenience.
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0397/kub_i.htm
--------------------
US Domestic Covert Operations
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0397/kub_i.htm
I. Introduction
A. Explanation of Purpose
This manual cannot teach anyone how to be, or become, a
good interrogator. At best it can help readers to avoid
the characteristic mistakes of poor interrogators.
Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK
interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence
interrogation of resistant sources. Designed as an aid
for interrogators and others immediately concerned, it
is based largely upon the published results of extensive
research, including scientific inquiries conducted by
specialists in closely related subjects.
There is nothing mysterious about interrogation. It
consists of no more than obtaining needed information
through responses to questions. As is true of all
craftsmen, some interrogators are more able than others;
and some of their superiority may be innate. But sound
interrogation nevertheless rests upon a knowledge of the
subject matter and on certain broad principles, chiefly
psychological, which are not hard to understand. The
success of good interrogators depends in large measure
upon their use, conscious or not, of these principles
and of processes and techniques deriving from them.
Knowledge of subject matter and of the basic principles
will not of itself create a successful interrogation,
but it will make possible the avoidance of mistakes that
are characteristic of poor interrogation. The purpose,
then, is not to teach the reader how to be a good
interrogator but rather to tell him what he must learn
in order to become a good interrogator.
1 [page break]
The interrogation of a resistant source who is a staff
or agent member of an Orbit intelligence or security
service or of a clandestine Communist organization is
one of the most exacting of professional tasks. Usually
the odds still favor the interrogator, but they are
sharply cut by the training, experience, patience and
toughness of the interrogatee. In such circumstances the
interrogator needs all the help that he can get. And a
principal source of aid today is scientific findings.
The intelligence service which is able to bring
pertinent, modern knowledge to bear upon its problems
enjoys huge advantages over a service which conducts its
clandestine business in eighteenth century fashion. It
is true that American psychologists have devoted
somewhat more attention to Communist interrogation
techniques, particularly "brainwashing", than to U. S.
practices. Yet they have conducted scientific inquiries
into many subjects that are closely related to
interrogation: the effects of debility and isolation,
the polygraph, reactions to pain and fear, hypnosis and
heightened suggestibility, narcosis, etc. This work is
of sufficient importance and relevance that it is no
longer possible to discuss interrogation significantly
without reference to the psychological research
conducted in the past decade. For this reason a major
purpose of this study is to focus relevant scientific
findings upon CI interrogation. Every effort has been
made to report and interpret these findings in our own
language, in place of the terminology employed by the
psychologists.
This study is by no means confined to a resume and
interpretation of psychological findings. The approach
of the psychologists is customarily manipulative; that
is, they suggest methods of imposing controls or
alterations upon the interrogatee from the outside.
Except within the Communist frame of reference, they
have paid less attention to the creation of internal
controls -- i.e., conversion of the source, so that
voluntary cooperation results. Moral considerations
aside, the imposition of external techniques of
manipulating people carries with it the grave risk of
later lawsuits, adverse publicity, or other attempts to
strike back.
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0397/kub_i.htm
==========
The most shocking story ever to surface concerning mind
control was that of Cathy O'Brien, involving many of
Washington's perverts, written by Cathy O'Brien and Mark
Phillips. The book is appropriately titled:
"TRANCE-FORMATION of AMERICA"
CLICK
================

Talk to The Randi Rhodes Show
LIVE (3-7pm ET) 1.866.303.2270
“What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of
the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of
defense, Donald Rumsfeld…”
- Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to
Colin Powell