Dick Eastman
The Bush - Cheny - Giffen - Kazakhstan link:
Sun Oct 21 00:34:42 2001


On August 14, 2000 this story appeared in a soon-to-be-defunct populist newspaper,
famous for exposing the power of the Bilderberg globalists. This article puts
Bush and Cheny in intimate business contact with the real prime suspects of the
WTC/Pentagon crashbombing frame-up. (Also, below, excerpts from Seymore
M. Hershe's expose of some of the same people in his New Yorker article of
August 9, 2001).

=============
The GOP presidential ticket may be fending off questions from reporters
concerning a Swiss investigation linking George W. Bush and Dick Cheny to
big oil's bribes and pay-offs to foreign interests.

by Martin Mann

Gov. George W. Bush and Richard Cheny, the Republican presidential and vice
presidential candidates, known in Washington as the "oil ticket" for their
intimate connections to the petroleum industry, may face worse corruption
scandals in coming months than the lewd, mendacious and cash-hungry Clinton
administration ever did. The Spotlight has learned from European and U.S.
investigative sources.

As Cheney, a millionaire petroleum executive who served as defense
secretary in the administration of George Bus, the candidate's father, rose
to accept the vice-presidential nomination from the cheering Republican
convention in Philadelphia, Swiss prosecutors quietly moved to impound over
$130 million in allegedly laundered funds depositied in Swiss banks.

According to preliminary findings of the Swiss inquiry, the frozen funds
represent under-the-table payoffs slipped to the top government officials of
Kazakhstan by giant U.S. petroleurm companies seeking favored access to that
oil-rich country, a former Soviet province that attained independence after
the collapse of communism.

Adised by Swiss authorities that the suspect acounts -- more than $85
million found hidden in private numbered accounts controlled by Kazakh
President Nursultan A. Nazarbayev in a single Geneva bank, Banque Pictet --
may violate the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, federal authorities in
New York launched an investigation of
their own.

The U.S. probe quickly focused on James H. Giffen, head of the Mercator
Corporation, known as an influential American financial advisor to
Nazarbayev.

Last month, the Justice Department sent Swiss chief prosecutor Daniel
Devaud a confidential memorandum naming Giffen and his public-relations
company as targets of a formal federal criminal investigation.

According to this memorandum, the Giffen probe was triggered by the
findings of FBI agents in New York indicating that the millions impounded at
Banque Pictet and other Swiss money-centers represented illegal payoffs to
Kazakh officials by three major U.S. oil companies: Exxon Mobil, BP Amoco,
and Phillips Petroleum.

Giffen's alleged role was that of the go-between who secretly transferred
these huge bribes from the U.S. oil corporations along circuitous
international money-laundering routes to Kazakhstan's president and his top
aides.

Spokespersons for Exxon Mobil, BP Amoco and Phillips Petreleum have
denied any wrongdoing. Mark J. MacDougal, a Washington lawyer for Giffen
also denied the charges.

But the Swiss-American inquiry is continuing. If it turns up solid
evidence of bribery by U.S. oil interests -- sources close to the case call
it "the most likely outcome" -- the next time-bomb of a question will be:
How many other petroleum potentates are soiled by this sordid affair?

Until he was offered -- and accepted -- the Republican vice-presidential
nomination this month, Cheny served as president of the Halliburton
Corporation, the world's largest oil-service, exploration and engineering
outfit.

A number of Halliburton's field operations have been linked to Exxon
Mobil's and BP Amoco's overseas ventures in recent years. Investigators are
poised to explore whether these links involved any operations in
corruption-riddled Kazakhstan.

Washington is buzzing with excited rumors that some major Bush campaign
contributors -- long time coronies of the presidential candidate -- will
face not just stinging embarrassemtn but criminal indictment when these
cases hit the headlines, especially if the Republicans fail to gain the
White House this fall. (end of Martin Mann's article of August 14, 2000)
===================

ELEVEN MONTHS AFTER MANN'S ARTICLE, THE NEW YORKER
PUBLISHED THIS ONE BY SEMOUR M. HERSH:

(excerpts)
The Price of Oil; What was Mobil uo to in Kazakhstan and Russia?
by Semour M. Hersh
New Yorker (Magazine), July 9, 2001 Pp. 48-65

In the fall of 1997, an international businessman named Farhat Tabbah filed
suit in London against three American businessmen, the oil minister of
Kazakhstan, and a subsidiary of the Mobil Corporation. He charged that they
had cheated him out of millions of dollars in commissions on what was to
have been a ten-year swap of oil between Kazakhstan and Iran. Mobil and the
other defendent denied the allegations and successfully moved to suppress
all Tabbah's affidavits and supporting documentation. A few months after
Tabbah filed his lawsuit, he flew to the United States and gave his account
of the swap plan to federal authorities. He also turned over seveeral file
drawers of documents, including internal Mobil faxes and memos, to agents
of the United States Customs Service.

Mobil conducted an investigation into its own actions and its potential
liabilities. (American oil companies are forbidden by federal sanctions
from trading with Iran or facilitating such trades without license from the
Treasury Department.) That investigation, which lasted more than a year and
was assisted by Patton Boggs, a Washington law firm, found evidence that J.
Bryan Williams III, a senior executive in charge of many of the conmpany's
overseas crude-oil transactions, may have facilitated the planned Iranian
oil swap. Williams was one of the three businessmen named in Tabbah's suit.
Mobil's senior management, however, then in the process of negotiating a
merger with Exxon, concluded that there was no need to report this evidence
to the Securities and Exchange COmmission or to stockholders. Bryan
WIlliams retired quietly in early 1998, at the age of fifty-eight, and, the
next year, Mobil and Exxon merged to form ExxonMobil, the world's largest
and most powerful publically traded oil company.

Mobil investigators also uncovered an array of unseemly business
dealings that took place in Russia and Kazakhstan in the mid-nineties. MOre
than a billion dollars of Mobil's cash was paid to Russian companies in
unorthodox transactions; questionable accounting practices were followed;
and multimillion-dollar transfers were made that, as a Patton Boggs report
put it in one case, "did not have any apparent valid business purpose." The
investrigators' working papers and summary reports, many of which were
obtained for this article, suggest that Mobil's activities in Russia and
Kazakhstan were not driven entirely by the desire for quick profit. The
company also had a strategic goal: access to Kazakhstan's rich Tengiz oil
field.

Tabbah's court papers and the internal Mobil documents gathered for this
account provide an unparralled view of a major American oil company's
dealings in the former Soviet Union. They raise questions about the
company's decisions to enter deals that ultimately benefitted powerful
figures in the region, including President Nursultan Nazarbayev, of
Kazakhstan, and former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, of Russia.

A federal grand jury in Washington has been hearing evidence on the swap
allecgations, along with allegations of money laundering and bribery, since
last year. Before a second grand jury, in New York, Mobil and other
American oil companies that do business in Kazakhstan were being questioned
about possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Under the
F.C.P.A., which was passed in 1997, it is unlawful for any American to bribe
foreign officials, either directly or through an agent, "for the purpose of
obtaining or retaining business."

ExxonMobil has refused to permit any of its employees to be interviewed
for this account, and has asked former Mobil employees not to cooperate.
The company has stated that it was not involved in the awap, did not own any
of the oil that was swapped, and did not authorize any employees to
participate in the planning and excecution of the swap. Bryan WIlliams
refuses to be interviewed, but, in a written statement, he denied any
involvement in the swap. Williams also declared that Mobil had approved all
the deals and contracts he worked on. When The New Yorker sent details of
the allegations to ExxonMobil for comment, an outside attorney, Martin
London, responded on the company's behalf, stating that many of the
allegations were erroneous," and that the "broad theme of your attack on
Mobil's business integrity is both incorrect and actionable." It would be
"innapropriate" for ExxonMobil to discuss the allegations specifically,
London wrote, because "there are ongoing grand-jury investigations relating
to the matters addressed in your letter."

The oil industry has long been swapping as a way to reduce the cost of
transporting crude oil, by pipeline or other menas, to refineries. The
arrangement also provides a way to get oil from remote oil fields and
isolated nations, such as Kazakhstan, to market. In a swap, the title to
oil in one location is transferred to oil of an equivalent value that may be
hundreds, or even thousands, of miles away. Because of the potential for
abuse in such complicated transactions, major oil companies carefully
monitor and record their swaps.

"It's extrememly rare for a legitimate company to play pricing games in a
transfer," said Thomas Stauffer, a retired economics professor at Harvard
and Georgetown who specializes in oil and taxation issues. "But in the
Third World --and especially in places like Kazakhstan -- its an invitation
to corruption. You can hide a lot of sins in an oil swap. Title to oil in
any tanker might change a dozen times before it gets to port." Such sins
include oil laundering -- concealing an illegal source of oil -- and
sanctions busting. "Oil is oil," Stauffer said. It can be sold in any
given market at any time." Men like Marc Rich, the fugitive financier who
was pardoned by Presidnet Clinton in January, have earned hundreds of
millions of dollars over the years by brokering oil deals with pariah
nations such as Iran and the former regime in South Africa.

In Mobil's case, the company's inhouse investigators came to believe that
the proposed swap between Kazakhstan and Iran was but one element in a
complex of seemingly high-risk business deals that were devised by Bryan
Williams. The investigation also led to the two other Americans named in
the Tabbah's suit: James H. Griffen, a New York merchant banker and advisor
to Kazakhstan's President Nazarbayev; and Friedhelm Eronat, a businessman
who often acted on behalf of Mobil overseas. The business dealings and
friendships among these three men date back many years, and they have done
billions of dollars worth of deals worldwide. The three might nver have
become the focus of grand-jury scrutiny if they hadn't fallen out with
Farhat Tabbah.

I - GETTING IN

Kazakhstan and the other former Soviet Republics in the Caspian Sea region
(Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan) have become notorious for
exploitation, corruption, and seemingly bottomless fields of oil whose
boundary seldom benefits the average citizen. Almaty, the business capital
of Kazakhstan, still has the solid look, the unemployment, the pollution of
the Soviet days, despite a decade of increasing oil and gas production.
Close to the Presidential palace, however, two new luxury hotels have been
built for the foreign businessmen drawn by the country's natural resources.

The Tengiz oil field is one of the most important finds since Alaska's
Prudhoe Bay, in 1968. The Soivets tried to develop it in the
nineteen-eighties, but instead triggered a gigantic blowout and a fire that
burned for a year, with a column of flame six hundred feet high. Tengiz was
not put into systematic production until the early nineteen-nineties, when
newly independent Kazakhstan sold a half interest of the field to Chevron,
the American oil company. Tengiz's output has steadily expanded since then.
"It's a geologist's dream -- the sort of field you see once in a
generation," Edward C. Chow, a retired Chevron executive, said. "It's a
mother of an oil field, and we still don't know how much oil is in it."

Bryan Williams turned out to be crucial to Mobil's efforts to get into
Tengiz. As executive vice-president of Mobil Sales and Supply, he bought
crude oil from oil companies controlled by foreign governments. A lawyer
turned oil man, WIlliams had graduated from the University of North Carolina
and New York University Law School and spent several years at Sherman &
Sterling, a prominent New York firm. In the early nineteen-seventies, he
joined Mobil. His first major assignment was in Saudi Arabia, where Lucio
A. Noto, who later became Mobil's C.E.O., was in charge of company
operations.

At Mobil, Williams was respected by his peers for his ability, his
panache, and his daring. One retired Mobil senior executive said he was
widely known as a "cowboy" -- a high-flier in a high-flying business.
International spot-market crude-oil prices are extremely volatile -- the
price of oil varies constantly from country to country -- and narrow profit
margins can change within minutes, necessitating snap judgements. It was
accepted at Mobil that successful oil man like Williams needed autonomy,
with no second-guessing, as they routinely committed millions in the hunt
for profits. Williams repaid the trust with smart deals.

He consistenly produced high profits, former Mobil officials told me, and
eventually became a favorite of Noto. "Noto and Bryan were close," DOn
Voelte, a former vice-president who left Mobil in 1997, recalled. ALthough
Williams reported not directly to Noto but to the head of sales at Mobil
headquarters, Voelte said that "Bryan was the go-to guy in the international
trading area." Noto would "always chastize other Mobil folks, saying, "Just
go to Bryan. He knows how to handle these things.'" ANother Mobil insider
tells of a high-level meeting at which Noto signaled out Williams as "the
only entrepreneur in the whole business."


To get into Tengiz, Mobil needed the help of James Giffen, who represented
the Kazahk government. (giffen was identified in press reports last summer
as a target of a federal investigation into corruption and money
laundering.) Giffen grew up in Stocton, California, where his father ran a
men's clothing store. He was graduated from the U.C.L.A. law school in
19654 and spent eleven years with the Armco Steel Corporation, which
struggled during the COld War to gain export approval for the slae of
oil-drilling equipment and steel goods to the Soviet Union. In the
mid-eighties, Giffen set up a banking company called Mercator, based in New
York City. He was brash, intelligent, eager to make money. "I nver had any
evidence that he was anything more than a smart operator," Jack F. Matlock,
Jr., who was the U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991
recalled. "He was always working for No. 1 -- Jim Giffen. But I could
understand that. I didn't detect anything irregular.

Giffen spent years cultivating senior officials of the COmmunist PArty,
such as Nursultan Nazarbayev, who was the Party's rising star in Kazakhstan.
In the late eighties, Nazarbayev, a former steel worker and engineer, became
First Secretary of the Kazahk Communist Party. After the Soviet collapse,
in 1991, he won the Presidency of the country. Giffen then became an
important Presidential adviser.

Nazarbayev's regime was quick to cooperate with the first Bush
Administration's plans to denuclearize the breakaway Soviet republics; more
than a thousand warheads that had been deployed by the Kremlin in Kazakhstan
at the height of the Cold War were sent ba

• The Bush - Cheny - Giffen - Kazakhstan link: (Cont'd) — Dick Eastman, Sun Oct 21 00:37
• "out of chaos comes ORDER... — LB Bork, Sun Oct 21 00:48