Dick Cheney made to the CIA before the war in Iraq. ...
Ray McGovern: Cheney, Forgery and the CIA
Saddam and the WMD Mystery. David Krieger ... I mean the
repeated visits Vice
President Dick Cheney made to the CIA before the war in Iraq.
...
HTTP://www.counterpunch.org/mcgovern06272003.html
June 27, 2003
Cheney, Forgery and the CIA
Not Business as Usual
By RAY McGOVERN
former CIA Analyst
As though this were normal! I mean the repeated visits Vice
President Dick Cheney made to the CIA before the war in Iraq.
The visits were, in fact, unprecedented. During my 27-year
career at the Central Intelligence Agency, no vice president
ever came to us for a working visit.
During the '80s, it was my privilege to brief Vice President
George H.W. Bush and other very senior policy-makers every other
morning. I went either to the vice president's office or (on
weekends) to his home. I am sure it never occurred to him to
come to CIA headquarters.
The morning briefings gave us an excellent window on what was
uppermost in the minds of those senior officials and helped us
refine our tasks of collection and analysis. Thus, there was
never any need for policy-makers to visit us. And the very
thought of a vice president dropping by to help us with our
analysis is extraordinary. We preferred to do that work without
the pressure that inevitably comes from policy-makers at the
table.
Cheney got into the operational side of intelligence as well.
Reports in late 2001 that Iraq had tried to acquire uranium from
Niger stirred such intense interest that his office let it be
known he wanted them checked out. So, with the CIA as
facilitator, a retired U.S. ambassador was dispatched to Niger
in February 2002 to investigate. He found nothing to
substantiate the report and lots to call it into question. There
the matter rested--until last summer, after the Bush
administration made the decision for war in Iraq.
Cheney, in a speech on Aug. 26, 2002, claimed that Saddam
Hussein had "resumed his effort to acquire nuclear weapons."
At the time, CIA analysts were involved in a knock-down,
drag-out argument with the Pentagon on this very point. Most of
the nuclear engineers at the CIA, and virtually all scientists
at U.S. government laboratories and the International Atomic
Energy Agency, found no reliable evidence that Iraq had
restarted its nuclear weapons program.
But the vice president had spoken. Sad to say, those in charge
of the draft National Intelligence Estimate took their cue and
stated, falsely, that "most analysts assess Iraq is
reconstituting its nuclear weapons program."
Smoke was blown about aluminum tubes sought by Iraq that, it
turns out, were for conventional weapons programs. The rest
amounted to things like Hussein's frequent meetings with nuclear
scientists and Iraq's foot-dragging in providing information to
U.N. inspectors.
Not much heed was paid to the fact that Hussein's son-in-law,
who supervised Iraq's nuclear program before he defected in
1995, had told interrogators that Iraq's nuclear
capability--save the blueprints--had been destroyed in 1991 at
his order. (Documents given to the United States this week
confirm that. The Iraqi scientists who provided them added that,
even though the blueprints would have given Iraq a head start,
no order was given to restart the program; and even had such an
order been given, Iraq would still have been years away from
producing a nuclear weapon.)
In sum, the evidence presented in last September's intelligence
estimate fell far short of what was required to support Cheney's
claim that Iraq was on the road to a nuclear weapon. Something
scarier had to be produced, and quickly, if Congress was to be
persuaded to authorize war. And so the decision was made to dust
off the uranium-from-Niger canard.
The White House calculated--correctly--that before anyone would
make an issue of the fact that this key piece of "intelligence"
was based on a forgery, Congress would vote yes. The war could
then be waged and won. In recent weeks, administration officials
have begun spreading the word that Cheney was never told the
Iraq-Niger story was based on a forgery. I asked a senior
official who recently served at the National Security Council if
he thought that was possible. He pointed out that rigorous NSC
procedures call for a very specific response to all vice
presidential questions and added that "the fact that Cheney's
office had originally asked that the Iraq-Niger report be
checked out makes it inconceivable that his office would not
have been informed of the results."
Did the president himself know that the information used to
secure congressional approval for war was based on a forgery? We
don't know. But which would be worse--that he knew or that he
didn't?
Ray McGovern, a CIA analyst from 1964 to 1990, regularly
reported to the vice president and senior policy-makers on the
President's Daily Brief from 1981 to 1985. He now is co-director
of the Servant Leadership School, an inner-city outreach
ministry in Washington. He can be reached at:
mcgovern@counterpunch.org.
News results for CHENEY CIA WMD - View today's top stories
CIA Leak Scandal: Judy Miller and the Times Speak - Yahoo! News
- Oct 17, 2005
MORE: