blueridge
Evidence furthers: Hi-jacked, but Substituted Scenario.
Fri Oct 8, 2004 20:00
69.43.12.95

As Dick Eastman has posted, by Woodybox in GlobalFreePress, this information, if true, "marries up" the hijacking reports, and proves that there was a SUBSTITUTION, or DECEPTION if you will, showing the confusion of airtraffic controllers themselves from the official story being reported that day--THAT IT WAS NOT THESE FLIGHTS THAT HIT THE TOWERS. The reports of these conversations in this article, and radar reports, prove that there was confusion about REAL hijackings of the alleged airliners, BUT THAT THEY WERE NOT THE ONES USED IN THE ATTACKS. http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=858

Carol Valentine, Snake Plissken's "Flight of the Bumble Planes", etc. all note a similar scenario. A quick examination of there timeline to begin with here, is helpful:
http://www.billstclair.com/Serendipity/wtcm040419/wtc4.htm

[quote]
In August 2003 the Valentine-Plissken hypothesis was refined further by Prof. A. K. Dewdney in his Operation Pearl, where he provides a more detailed theory as to what happened on September 11th and a timeline of events consistent with the evidence ("X" in flight numbers refers to planes substituted for the original planes):


Time Event
7:59 am UA11 takes off from Boston's Logan Airport
8:14 am UA175 takes off from Boston's Logan Airport
8:16 am First deviation of AA11 north of Albany, NY
8:20 am AA77 takes off from Washington's Dulles Airport
8:20 am AA11 transponder turned off
8:30 am First swap: Flight AA11-X takes over, transponder off
8:35 am Beginning of NY ATC transcript
8:40 am UA175 transponder is turned off
8:42 am UA93 takes off from Newark, NJ
First deviation of UA175 over northern NJ
8:46 am Second swap: Flight AA77X takes over, same t-code
8:46 am AA11-X strikes north tower of WTC
Nationwide alert begins
8:53 am Third swap: Flight UA175X takes over, transponder off
AA11 lands at Harrisburg
8:54 am End of NY ATC transcript
8:55 am AA77X transponder is turned off
9:02 am UA175X strikes south tower of WTC
UA175 lands at Harrisburg
Fourth swap: Flight UA93X replaces UA93
9:07 am UA93 lands at Harrisburg
9:09 am AA77 lands at Harrisburg
9:37 am AA77X overflies the Pentagon, aircraft or explosion at Wedge 1
9:45 am UA93 takes off from Harrisburg
10:06 am UA93 crashes near Shanksville, PA

As in the Valentine-Plissken hypothesis, all innocent passengers on board flights UA 175, AA 11 and AA 77 were placed on board Flight UA 93, which was then shot down by a U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt (shown at right) over Pennsylvania. The other three Boeing jets ended up in pieces at the bottom of the Atlantic ocean.

[unquote]

Remember, these were the first domestic airline hijackings in about 20 years! Only an inside job, could pull it off.

And since the new documentary www.911inPlaneSite.com clearly proves, per WCBS video and Fox, that the jet that hit the South tower "not an American airlines....not an American airlines"......"was not a commercial airliner"...."had no windows"....."a cargo plane"....etc. [see this video clip
http://www.911inplanesite.com/nowindows_video.wvx], then the unanswered question is "what happened to the real passsenger airliners?" This new report helps show:


1. They were hijacked, but were not the "attack" vehicles.

2. Sent to other airports or areas, per these FAA conversations and radar. (Remember, transponders were turned off, so 'blips' were unidentifiable).
See the excellent FLIGHT MAP at the bottom of this site: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/spencer02.htm

3. Contrary to the above Valentine/Plissken hypothesis, Flight 93 we know landed at Cleveland, per the TV station web site, under "bomb threat", as announced by the mayor, the morning of Sept. 11th.
See WCPO's original version, only revised in August, after 3 years. [http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:uPaTY9cRV3gJ:www.wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html+&hl=en]

Note how this new article shows that Flight 93 THEN WAS PICKED UP AS UNIDENTIFIED AIRLINER THE NEXT DAY -- i.e. Sept. 12th--after Cleveland forced landing day prior...and landed somewhere in the D.C. area (Langley?) This marries up nicely, the Cleveland landing, and explains its absence until the following day. The Cleveland news article thus provides the answer, to where it was until this report 24 hrs later.

This German site, shows good photos that remains of Flight 93 are not evident, therefore its identity unproven, in its alleged crash in Shanksville, PA. http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/defaulte.htm

Which raises another question...what DID crash in Shanksville, and why, if not Flight 93? It was not a Boeing 757 for sure.
The Saab Jet, pictured in Naudet video, documented 9/11 Nutshell posts, was reported by eyewitnesses in that area immediately after the "crash". There is also mention of a Cargo plane, a C130 (for remote control?) in the air around the twin towers on 9/11, as well as a helicopter, which flew "in formation" with the supersonic, white, and unmarked military Saab Jet, which left the scene after South Tower was struck. http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/other.html
Could this be where that C130 cargo plane crashed (since there were practically no body parts found, and no 757 parts)...AFTER USING IT IN THE TWIN TOWER ATTACKS.....to hide the evidence? Possibly even the crew?

4. Dick Eastman believes, along with Valentine and Plissken, that Flight 77 overflew the Pentagon to land at National. Others believe that flight landed elsewhere, some in West Virginia (Yeager)http://www.serendipity.li/wot/spencer02.htm......some like Woodybox, to Kansas: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=858


Thus all the airliners could have been kept and secretly "decommissioned", leaving the only other question, of the fate (or confirmed identities), of the passengers, who were indeed "taken by force"...seized by hijackers, and commandeered, BUT FOR PURPOSES OF OBFUSCATION, NOT FOR USE AS THE ATTACKING AERIAL VEHICLES.

This brings up other questions, which may assist about the passengers. Why was this methodology used...of hijacked airliners? Why not fly in the other planes, without the passenger hijackings? (Of course, that would not help establish Police State tactics, Homeland Security, PATRIOT Act, and invasive searches of normal citizens for "security" measures). But who were these people that were passengers, who apparently have disappeared, or cannot be authenticated, or were "put away" somewhere? NO PASSENGER BODIES HAVE BEEN FOUND OR IDENTIFIED FROM ANY OF THE FLIGHTS.
[source: http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/defaulte.htm]

AND, since none of the Arab hijackers names were provided on the boarding lists.....HOW MANY OF THE "PASSENGERS" WERE TRAVELERS, AND HOW MANY WERE IN ON THE HIJACKING? How many funerals have been conducted, versus assuming that these names were all victims, without body identification, or family verification? The passenger lists were exceedingly small, for these flights....a suspicion frequently brought up. Some families have gone on local TV news to talk about a family member who died in an Airliner, or of course the Todd Beamer story...but very few, and no bodily evidence from an airline passenger has ever been produced to verify a death! For such an evil operation, a host of other possibilities, even kidnapping and new identities, or different causes of death, could be offered, such as Valentine/Plissken's "ocean" scenario above. But if plane evidence and wreckage is contrary to that of Boeing passenger airliners, Justice requires another answer other than the "official story".