Liberty Beat
More eyewitnesses to U.S. torture of detainees pierce the Bush
administration's cover-up
by Nat Hentoff
October 7th, 2005 5:13 PM>

He rules the law.
photo: Eric Draper, White House.
The outlook of Richard Nixon was that he was above the law. Watergate
disabused him of the notion. The position of George W. Bush is
that he is a law unto himself. - Lincoln Caplan, editor of Legal
Affairs (associated with Yale Law School), September 2005
Have we ever had a situation like this, where presumably this
warlike status could last for 25 years, 50 years, whatever it
is? - Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, during oral
arguments, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 2004
The torture of detainees was so widespread and accepted that it
became a means of stress relief for soldiers. Soldiers said they
felt welcome to come to the PUC [Person Under Control] tent on
their off hours to '... a PUC' or 'Smoke a PUC.' '...ing a PUC'
referred to beating a detainee, while 'Smoking a PUC' referred
to forced physical exertion sometimes to the point of
unconsciousness. - "Leadership Failure: Firsthand Accounts of
Torture of Iraqi Detainees by the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne
Division," Human Rights Watch, September 2005
Since 9-11, I've been covering the steadily increasing
dislocation of our system of government—most vividly
demonstrated by the Bush administration's systematic abuses of
detainees (a/k/a prisoners), including torture. But despite the
huge amount of documented evidence, only low-level soldiers have
been disciplined. The top of the chain of command—Bush, Rumsfeld,
Gonzales, et al.—is untouched by the Defense Department's
"investigations" of itself.
During the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, there
was a continuing, fractious debate on how to prevent one branch
of government (the executive) from overpowering the other (the
legislative). The Supreme Court had yet to realize its full
identity until John Marshall became chief justice in 1801.
(Earlier, Alexander Hamilton erroneously called it "the least
dangerous branch.")
There have been times in our history when the presidency did
overpower the other two branches. During the Civil War, Abraham
Lincoln suspended "the Great Writ," habeas corpus—by which a
person imprisoned can go to a court and make the government
prove he or she is being held legally. With Lincoln supreme,
around 38,000 Americans suspected of espionage or just
disloyalty were arrested by military officers, and were
imprisoned—without charges—indefinitely, even though the
civilian courts were still open. (George W. Bush has followed
suit with "enemy combatants." And the Republican leadership in
Congress is now working on bills to "streamline" habeas corpus
into a corpse. More on that in a later column.)
In 1866, Lincoln, dead by then, was sternly rebuked by the
Supreme Court (Ex Parte Milligan) for the unconstitutional
powers he had taken during the Civil War. Said the Court:
"The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and
people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield
of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under
all circumstances." (Emphasis added.)
But George W. Bush, as commander in chief, ignores that ruling
in the forbidding name of national security as he keeps
declaring that this nation is an example to the world—of freedom
and the moral values of a constitutional democracy.
Recently, at least some of the press has given considerable
space to the newest in a series of reports by Human Rights
Watch, an invaluable watchdog of this administration's making up
the rule of law as it goes along. However, another hurricane or
another disappeared young woman will take the place of Human
Rights Watch's "Leadership Failure: Firsthand Accounts of
Torture of Iraqi Detainees by the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne
Division."
As National Public Radio's excellent national security
correspondent Jackie Northam said during her September 25 report
on this Human Rights Watch exposé: "There's just too many
reports like this from captains, sergeants, officers,
non-commissioned officers, that we can't keep ignoring it."
I have large files of such reports from Amnesty International,
Human Rights First, the Center for Constitutional Rights, The
New England Journal of Medicine (about military doctors'
complicity in these often savage abuses of prisoners), and New
York University law school's Center on Law and Security. But
with Republican control of Congress, and an opposition
Democratic Party that doesn't focus nearly enough on this
continually broken rule of law (including the evisceration of
the Fourth Amendment at home), all the protectors of the
Constitution can do is keep hanging on. (Next week: How John
McCain is insistently staying on the case of brutalized
detainees.)
From the Human Rights Watch report: "Residents of Fallujah
called them 'the Murderous Maniacs' because of how they treated
Iraqis in detention. They were soldiers of the U.S. Army's 82 nd
Airborne Division . . . stationed at Forward Operating Base
Mercury in Iraq. The soldiers considered this [description of
them] a badge of honor."
The report discloses that two non-commissioned officers and a
captain, Ian Fishback, in multiple interviews with Human Rights
Watch investigators, say that "torture of detainees took place
almost daily . . . from September 2003 to April 2004. . . . The
acts of torture and other cruel or inhuman treatment . . .
include severe beatings (in one incident, a soldier reportedly
broke a detainee's leg with a baseball bat); the application of
chemical substances to exposed skin and eyes; forced stress
positions . . . sometimes to the point of unconsciousness; sleep
deprivation [for days on end]; the stacking of detainees into
human pyramids; and, the withholding of food (beyond crackers)
and water."
For 17 months, Captain Fishback raised his concerns within the
army chain of command, and the army agreed to conduct an
investigation "only after he had contacted members of Congress
[including Senator John McCain] and considered going public with
the story." Days before the Human Rights Watch report was
released, the captain was told he couldn't leave the base to
meet with members of McCain's staff "without approval and that
approval was being denied because his commanding officer felt
[he] was being na and would do irreparable harm to his career."
The captain, however, refuses to be muzzled.
====================
New Threat Renews Old Tactic
by Jarrett Murphy
Random searches on the subways are as much about the appearance
of safety as safety itself. Welcome to safety theater . . .
http://villagevoice.com/news/0541,murphy,68701,2.html