Robert SterlingLEAKGATE - PART IFri Oct 3 15:41:57 200364.140.158.6Please send as far and wide as possible.Thanks,Robert SterlingEditor, The Konformist http://www.konformist.com "Even though I'm a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I havenothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust byexposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the mostinsidious of traitors."- George H.W. Bush, at the dedication of the George Bush Center forIntelligence.***Slate.comchatterbox Gossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics.Did Rove Blow a Spook's Cover?The White House won't say.By Timothy NoahPosted Tuesday, September 16, 2003A minor flap has been brewing since syndicated columnist RobertNovak, citing "two senior administration officials," reported in Julythat Joseph C. Wilson IV was married to a Central Intelligence Agencyspecialist on "weapons of mass destruction" named Valerie Plame.Wilson is the former diplomat sent by the CIA last year to check outallegations that Iraq had purchased uranium from Niger. He caused theBush administration no small embarrassment by stating, in a July 6 op-ed, that he'd reported "it was highly doubtful that any suchtransaction had ever taken place." Novak hasn't particularlysupported the Iraq war, and his column essentially took Wilson'sside. But the fact that Novak blew Plame's cover (in the course ofrelating that Wilson was sent at Plame's suggestion) gave TheNation's David Corn the opportunity to accuse the Bush administrationof compromising national security, in violation of the IntelligenceIdentities Protection Act of 1982. Wilson wouldn't confirm that hiswife works for the CIA, but he told Corn that if she did, then namingher this way would have compromised every operation, everyrelationship, every network with which she had been associated in herentire career. This is the stuff of Kim Philby and Aldrich Ames.The question of whether to investigate who in the Bush administrationblew Plame's cover surfaced Aug. 21 at a forum about intelligencefailures on Iraq held by Rep. Jay Inslee, a fervently anti-warDemocrat. Wilson, who was present, had this to say:It's of keen interest to me to see whether or not we can get KarlRove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs. And trust me,when I use that name, I measure my words.This appeared to be an unsubtle hint that Wilson knew one of theleakers to be Rove. Taking the bait, someone asked White House pressspokesman Scott McClellan about it today:Q: On the Robert Novak-Joseph Wilson situation, Novak reportedearlier this year quoting "anonymous government sources" telling himthat Wilson's wife was a CIA operative. Now, this is apparently afederal offense, to burn the cover [of] a CIA operative. Wilson nowbelieves that the person who did this was Karl Rove. He's quoted froma speech last month as saying, "At the end of the day, it's of keeninterest to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs." Did Karl Rove tell that?A: I haven't heard that. That's just totally ridiculous. But we'vealready addressed this issue. If I could find out who anonymouspeople were, I would. I just said, it's totally ridiculous.Q: But did Karl Rove do it?A: I said, it's totally ridiculous.Now, on one level, Chatterbox feels mildly sympathetic towardMcClellan. White House etiquette prevented him from saying, "How thehell should I know? If Rove blew the cover of a CIA agent, do yousuppose he'd be stupid enough to tell me about it?" And McClellandeserves points for not taking a leaf from his predecessor AriFleischer's playbook, which says that you should always deny damagingstuff well before you know whether it's true.But on another level, it's pretty unsettling that McClellan refusesto answer the question at all. Rove is, after all, the president'sprincipal political adviser, a man so influential that a recent bookabout him was titled Bush's Brain. McClellan could have saidsomething like, "I have a very hard time imagining that to be true,but if you like I'll ask him." But McClellan didn't say that. Maybehe finds all speculation about wacky national-security skullduggeryrepellant in light of his father's embarrassing new book allegingthat Lyndon Johnson murdered John F. Kennedy. Or maybe - just maybe -McClellan wonders himself whether Rove got a little overzealous.Wilson, for his part, denied today that he ever accused Rove. He toldChatterbox "Karl Rove" was simply a handy metonym for whatevertwo "senior administration officials" fingered Plame (correctly orfalsely, Wilson still won't say). But Wilson's "I measure my words"comment at the Inslee forum suggests to Chatterbox that Wilson is nowbeing coy about what he knows, or at least suspects, regarding Rove.Maybe it's time for somebody to ask Rove himself whether he risked 10years in jail in order to suggest that Wilson got his Nigerassignment based on nepotism. And, perhaps, deliberately to punishWilson by destroying his wife's career at the CIA. Rove is ruthlessenough to have done so. The only real question is whether Bush'sBrain is stupid enough.Timothy Noah writes "Chatterbox" for Slate.E-mail Timothy Noah at chatterbox@slate.com.*****George W. NixonWASHINGTON, July 24, 2003CBSNews.comPresident Bush is often compared to Ronald Reagan and George Bush theElder. In his latest Against the Grain commentary, CBSNews.com's DickMeyer says think Nixon.Fall guys, intimidation and leaked personal attacks on enemies areback in at the 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. How Nixonian. Howdisappointing.Political enemy number one is former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.Wilson wrote an op-ed piece in "The New York Times" on July 6 thatinfuriated the White House. Wilson reported that in 2002, at theCIA's request, he had investigated reports that Iraq was trying tobuy uranium from Niger and that he had found the reports baseless.>From that firsthand experience, Wilson wrote about the case for warin Iraq, "that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclearweapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."Wilson's piece ignited a full-blown frenzy and led to an embarrassingWhite House admission that it shouldn't have included the discreditedclaim about "yellowcake" from Niger in his State of the Unionaddress. The Texans didn't 'ppreciate that.Eight days after Wilson published his piece, veteran reporter RobertNovak wrote a column that said, "Wilson never worked for the CIA, buthis wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of massdestruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson'swife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate [the reports]."Wilson's wife, it has been reported elsewhere, worked undercover.The "two senior officials" who blew her cover to Novak probably didsomething illegal. They certainly did something vile. Chuck Colson,the keeper of Nixon's enemies list, would be so proud.Wilson told Newsday, "This might be seen as a smear on me and myreputation, but what it really is is an attempt to keep anybody elsefrom coming forward."Political enemy number two is ABC News correspondent Jeffrey Kofman.Kofman filed a story that reported on morale problems of troops withthe Third Infantry long stationed in Iraq. He had a quote from asoldier who said, "If Donald Rumsfeld was here, I'd ask him for hisresignation." The Texans didn't `ppreciate that.After the piece ran, Matt Drudge says he got a call from a WhiteHouse aide who anonymously leaked the inflammatory secret that Kofmanis (young readers, please do not continue) - Canadian. A Canuck,reporting on our boys? I never...Oh yeah, the leaker also disclosed that Kofman is gay. It so happensthat Kofman is very openly gay. (For the record, he used to work atCBS News, but I don't believe I ever met or talked to him.)The Drudge Report ran a headline about Kofman's connection to thedreaded C-word. It also linked to a profile of him in "The Advocate,"a gay magazine. Chuck Colson would be so proud.So far, the Bush Team hasn't had as much luck with fall guys. CIAchief George Tenet tried to take the bullet for the "yellowcake"flap, but the flap flapped on. So NSC aide Stephen Hadley was sentout to take it on the chin. Neither resigned, neither was fired. Theyjust took responsibility.That is something the President has not done.Last week, a reader who often sends me very smart e-mails with hisown political analysis, wrote that he had just had a "Eureka"epiphany about the GWB-RMN axis. I dismissed it. I think George Bushis much more like Ronald Reagan: supremely self-confident,simplistic, sincere, comfortable in his skin and thus comforting, un-neurotic, lacking all traces of self-doubt, incurious, nice manners.Nixon had none of those qualities.But the Bush White House is becoming Nixon-like, with a smile and, ofcourse, good manners. It's re-election time and it's CREEP-Y.Dick Meyer, the Editorial Director of CBSNews.com, is based inWashington. For many years, he was a political and investigativeproducer for The CBS News Evening News With Dan Rather.*****Townhall.comMission to NigerRobert NovakJuly 14, 2003WASHINGTON -- The CIA's decision to send retired diplomat Joseph C.Wilson to Africa in February 2002 to investigate possible Iraqipurchases of uranium was made routinely at a low level withoutDirector George Tenet's knowledge. Remarkably, this produced apolitical firestorm that has not yet subsided.Wilson's report that an Iraqi purchase of uranium yellowcake fromNiger was highly unlikely was regarded by the CIA as less thandefinitive, and it is doubtful Tenet ever saw it. Certainly,President Bush did not, prior to his 2003 State of the Union address,when he attributed reports of attempted uranium purchases to theBritish government. That the British relied on forged documents madeWilson's mission, nearly a year earlier, the basis of furiousDemocratic accusations of burying intelligence though the report wasforgotten by the time the president spoke.Reluctance at the White House to admit a mistake has led Democratsever closer to saying the president lied the country into war. Evenafter a belated admission of error last Monday, finger-pointingbetween Bush administration agencies continued. Messages betweenWashington and the presidential entourage traveling in Africa hashedover the mission to Niger.Wilson's mission was created after an early 2002 report by theItalian intelligence service about attempted uranium purchases fromNiger, derived from forged documents prepared by what the CIA callsa "con man." This misinformation, peddled by Italian journalists,spread through the U.S. government. The White House, State Departmentand Pentagon, and not just Vice President Dick Cheney, asked the CIAto look into it.That's where Joe Wilson came in. His first public notice had come in1991 after 15 years as a Foreign Service officer when, as U.S. chargein Baghdad, he risked his life to shelter in the embassy some 800Americans from Saddam Hussein's wrath. My partner Rowland Evansreported from the Iraqi capital in our column that Wilson showed "thestuff of heroism." President George H.W. Bush the next year named himambassador to Gabon, and President Bill Clinton put him in charge ofAfrican affairs at the National Security Council until his retirementin 1998.Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is anAgency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senioradministration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending himto Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contacthim. "I will not answer any question about my wife," Wilson told me.After eight days in the Niger capital of Niamey (where he onceserved), Wilson made an oral report in Langley that an Iraqi uraniumpurchase was "highly unlikely," though he also mentioned in passingthat a 1988 Iraqi delegation tried to establish commercial contacts.CIA officials did not regard Wilson's intelligence as definitive,being based primarily on what the Niger officials told him andprobably would have claimed under any circumstances. The CIA reportof Wilson's briefing remains classified.All this was forgotten until reporter Walter Pincus revealed in theWashington Post June 12 that an unnamed retired diplomat had giventhe CIA a negative report. Not until Wilson went public on July 6,however, did his finding ignite the firestorm.During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, Wilson had taken ameasured public position -- viewing weapons of mass destruction as adanger but considering military action as a last resort. He hasseemed much more critical of the administration since revealing hisrole in Niger. In the Washington Post July 6, he talked about theBush team "misrepresenting the facts," asking: "What else are theylying about?"After the White House admitted error, Wilson declined all televisionand radio interviews. "The story was never me," he told me, "it wasalways the statement in (Bush's) speech." The story, actually, iswhether the administration deliberately ignored Wilson's advice, andthat requires scrutinizing the CIA summary of what their envoyreported. The Agency never before has declassified that kind ofinformation, but the White House would like it to do just that now --in its and in the public's interest.*****CIA seeks probe of White HouseEXCLUSIVE, MSNBC and NBC NewsWASHINGTON, Sept. 26The CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegationsthat the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity ofone of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman'shusband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush'ssince-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uraniumfrom Africa, NBC News has learned.THE FORMER ENVOY, Joseph Wilson, who was acting ambassador to Iraqbefore the first Gulf War, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 toinvestigate a British intelligence report that Iraq sought to buyuranium there. Although Wilson discredited the report, Bush cited itin his State of the Union address in January among the evidence hesaid justified military action in Iraq.The administration has since had to repudiate the claim. CIA DirectorGeorge Tenet said the 16-word sentence should not have been includedin Bush's Jan. 28 speech and publicly accepted responsibility forallowing it to remain in the president's text.Wilson published an article in July alleging, however, that the WhiteHouse recklessly made the charge knowing it was false."We spend billions of dollars on intelligence," Wilson wrote. "But weend up putting something in the State of the Union address, somethingwe got from another intelligence agency, something we cannotindependently verify, in an area of Africa where the British have noon-the-ground presence."WHITE HOUSE DENIALSThe next week, columnist Robert Novak published an article in whichhe revealed that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, was a covert CIAoperative specializing in weapons of mass destruction. "Two senioradministration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending himto Niger to investigate," Novak wrote.The White House has denied being Novak's source, whom he has refusedto identify. But Wilson has said other reporters have told him WhiteHouse officials leaked Plame's identity.NBC News' Andrea Mitchell reported Friday night that the CIA hasasked the Justice Department to investigate whether White Houseofficials blew Plame's cover in retaliation against Wilson. Revealingthe identities of covert officials is a violation of two laws, theNational Agents' Identity Act and the Unauthori LEAKGATE - PART II Robert Sterling, Fri Oct 3 15:45 LEAKGATE - WHO LEAKED? (CLICK) Justin Raimondo, Fri Oct 3 15:54 libby? lll, Sat Oct 4 14:08 BUSH, "F**K LEAKGATE" differentstrings, Fri Oct 3 17:30 fineman's take lll, Sat Oct 4 13:59
Main Page - Wednesday, 10/05/03
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES