RESPONSE TO LEGAL REALITY
Tue Oct 3, 2006 01:37

 
From: Ruth D. Bundy or Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr.
Date: 09/28/06 00:06:41
To: legal_reality@earthlink.net ; apfn@apfn.org
>>>Subject: Guilt By Silence

On 092806 you wrote:

28 September A.D. 2006

This is a rather dangerous sentiment, isn't it! Guilt by silence? What
happened to proof beyond a reasonable doubt?!

Very dangerous idea, here! Very dangerous.

Harmon

>>>Mr. Harmon:

>>>Thank you for a response on my post!

>>>What about US V. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297

>>>The Prudden court also stated that:

Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.



>>>[United States v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831, 91 S. Ct. 62, 27 L. Ed. 2d 62 (1970). ]


>>>Supra, p. 1032.

>>>Clearly the U.S. Supreme Court Case 06-382 exposed the Supreme Court of Florida, Second District Court of Appeal of Florida, Judge Herbert John Baumann, Jr. with Violating the Constitution of Florida PLUS aiding and abetting Felony Perjury by doing nothing! SILENCE involved the 092206 Waiver to Respond filed by the Florida Attorney General in answer to the Petition where the State Attorney General has a legal and moral duty to speak OR where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading IMHO.

**** We thought the message above would appear as an answer Sir. Sorry we didn't respond on the APFN board.

Ralph Charles Whitley, Sr.
100306
 

Main Page - Wednesday, 10/04/06

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)