The End
by
Tom Mysiewicz -
tgmy7@hotmail.com
What has been the end of the Neocon's Iraq strategy from
the start? It's fairly obvious now that it wasn't WMDs
or even oil. It's clear to me that it was done for the
benefit of Israel. But now that the Palestinians have
been boxed in and any conceivable Israeli security
objectives have been met, it's obvious that Iraq is part
of a more sinister endgame.
For some two years prior to the Iraq war, in Council of
Foreign Relations and other elite circles, stories were
circulated about the benefits of partitioning Iraq into
Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish regions for the benefit of the
"Greater Mid East" (read instead: "Eretz Israel"). It
now appears that with the help of mercenaries and
provocateurs (as in the case of the captured British
commandos) this situation will become a reality at some
point. This could lead to a bloody civil war--easily
anticipated prior to the U.S. invasion--and probably
leave the Israelis in control of the majority of Iraq's
oil through proxies in a future Kurdistan.
A depopulated, destroyed Iraq will be in no position to
prevent the diversion of its oil supplies and water from
the Tigris and Euphrates to Eretz Israel. Further, the
conflict could spill over into Syria and Iran and other
regional states, possibly drawing them into a conflict
reminiscent of the Iran-Iraq war.
In order for this Neocon strategy--to turn Israel into a
world power not dependent on the fickle U.S. for its
survival--to work, it is obvious that Iran will have to
be substantially weakened. Enter the latest Israeli
noises that sound like an ultimatum to the U.S. and the
world to de-nuclearize Iran or else.
Further evidence that the U.S. is gearing up for a major
military conflict with Iran may come in several weeks as
President Bush is expected to propose the legalization
of millions of illegal Mexican workers in the U.S. This
is important as a large-scale military callup could
produce labor shortages that would not be appreciated by
the president's wealthy backers. Cheap Mexican labor can
keep the economy humming as a draft progresses.
Another key to the war effort could be a value-added
tax. While President Bush has said he had no plans to
raise income taxes to pay for the Iraq war and two
hurricanes (and presumably a future war) he said nothing
about a VAT that would transfer the tax burden for war
squarely onto the backs of poor and middle-class
Americans--something his wealthy backers also should
appreciate.
###
====================
FOCUS | Barbara Lee: Permanent Occupation
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/100105X.shtml
Anyone familiar with the Project for a New American
Century (PNAC) should be skeptical about the
administration's claims that it does not have plans for
a permanent military presence in Iraq. According to
Barbara Lee, PNAC, many of whose founders, including
Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, went on to serve in the
Bush administration, published a document in 2000 titled
'Rebuilding America's Defenses.' It plainly cites the
objective of an increased US military presence in the
region as a rationale for invading Iraq.
Camp Casey Goes to Washington
http://truthout.org/campcaseydc.shtml
TO's coverage of Cindy Sheehan's efforts to rally the
nation against war continues with powerful new videos,
first-hand reports and comments. Stay with our coverage.
Mayday Mississippi Delta
http://www.truthout.org/mayday.shtml
TO continues to provide information support for everyone
impacted by Katrina and Rita. We will continue to
provide the best sources available for the most
up-to-date and expansive coverage possible.
============================
Everyone be advised, that it has been reported on SWR
last night that Venezuela has, as of yesterday,
withdrawn all of their money from U.S. banks! This is
very serious, as they supply most of our imported oil.
And, we now have 11 refineries of our own shut down due
to Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. This represents 10 % of
our nation's refining capacity. What's more, nearly all
oil production from the gulf remains shut in!
cals@valornet.com
Venezuela rules out breaking relations with US
Xinhua, China - 15 hours ago
Venezuela is not interested in breaking relations with
the North American country, but "we are not going to
allow a disrespect of our sovereignty, laws and ...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/01/content_3570573.htm
Prensa Latina, Cuba - 23 hours ago
Caracas, Sep 30 (Prensa Latina) Vice President of
Venezuela José Vicente Rangel has accused the Bush
family of ties with terrorists, especially criminal Luis
...
MORE:>>
Venezuela rules out breaking relations with US
www.chinaview.cn 2005-10-01 10:41:45
CARACAS, Sept. 30 (Xinhuanet) -- Venezuelan Vice Foreign
Minister for North America, Maria Del Pilar Hernandez,
said Friday her country has no interest in breaking
relations with the United States despite tensions
between them.
Venezuela is not interested in breaking relations with
the North American country, but "we are not going to
allow a disrespect of our sovereignty, laws and
authorities," said Hernandez during an interview with
the private news channel Globovision.
Hernandez did not rule out a dialogue between Caracas
and Washington, saying one way to do it is through
respect by the United States for the government of
President Hugo Chavez.
"I look forward to the dialogue taking place to allow
for an improvement of relations between the two
nations," said the official.
She also renewed the demand that Washington extradite to
Venezuela Luis Posada Carrilles, who was accused of
blowing up a Cuban airliner in 1976.
Posada, 77, was born in Cuba and gained Venezuelan
citizenship in 1960. He was sentenced to imprisonment in
Venezuela on charges of involvement in the Cubana de
Aviacion airliner bombing which killed 73 people in
1976. But he escaped from prison in 1985.
Posada illegally entered the United States last March
and sought asylum there through his lawyer the next
month. In mid-May,US authorities arrested Posada for
having entered US territory illegally, but has refused
to hand him over to Venezuela.
Venezuela and the United States have been locked in
disputes since Chavez took office six years ago.
Chavez has accused US President George W. Bush of
supporting the failed coup d'Etat in April 2002 which
ousted him for 72 hoursand also blasted the United
States for supporting a plot to assassinate him. But
Washington has denied the charges. Enditem
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/01/content_3570573.htm