### HOW THE MEDIA WORKS: 911 Cover-up ###Sun Sep 24, 2006 23:19
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: ### HOW THE MEDIA WORKS: 911 Cover-up ###
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:59:39 -0400
From: Dstacey firstname.lastname@example.org
I just received a message that contained the following information. I hope you will read this carefully and then contemplate the meaning. CNN interviewed Jamie McIntyre, the reporter who was on the scene at the Pentagon immediately after the attack there. His totally spontaneous report at that time was clear. He saw "no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon." Now he has changed his story. So you can choose which version you believe. Was his spontaneous report at the scene at the time true? Or is the completely different version now reported the one you should believe?
Please send this to others.
The release of new video footage of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon has spurred yet another controversy. In anticipation of the release, CNN’s Kyra Phillips was interviewed Jamie McIntyre that Tuesday afternoon, and asked him what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, as he was reporting live from the scene that day.
Referring to the idea that something other than a 757 hit the Pentagon, McIntyre stated, "Having been there on September 11th, having seen the plane wreckage and photographed it myself personally, I can tell you that’s nonsense"…Sound Clip: http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_5_16_2.wav
"I had a camera with me, I took pictures of some of the wreckage, some of the parts of the fuselage of …a part of the cockpit, until they told us we had to move back away from the scene…" Sound Clip: http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_5_16_1.wav
However, McIntyre’s comments are in direct contradiction to his "original" report on 9/11, when he stated, "…from my close up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual… side of the building that’s crashed in and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon." Sound Clip: http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_%209_11.wav
You can't have it both ways! If the Pentagon was a lie so was the whole 911 WTC scenario also a lie.
This page has a good overview of all of the Flight 77 sites and APFN pages. APFN has some of the best discussions on 9/11 and the threat of tyranny. ...
We are Not saying, that was NO plane, Flight 77 that crashed into the Pentagon. We are saying, Where IS Flight 77, at the CRASH SITE?
Main Page -
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES