TruthSeeker24
The Fake War on Terrorism.
Mon Sep 27, 2004 15:17
128.82.56.23

I've wrote this months ago:


From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/phantomtruth/message/4644



The Fake War on Terrorism

oying America and the world to be replaced by global rule is the game plan by the globalists. Terrorism is a way they choose to accelerate their aims obviously. These intense acts operate all throughout human history.

Accounts replete with examples of governments orchestrating terror strikes against their own citizens for total surrender. (i.e. the burning of Rome in July 18 64 A.D. by Nero, fire at Nicomedia on February 303 A.D., the Maine, Luistiana, Reichstag fire, Pearl Harbor, Operation Northwoods nearly occurring in the 1960’s, the Gulf of Tonkin event, Waco, Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, etc. which are all validated by a mountain load of sources) This phony ‘war on terrorism’ is different. Our mortal enemy (al-Qaeda, a military industrial complex creation) were facing was armed, trained, and controlled by the U.S. government.

Truly, lone criminals flourish today, but a lot of international terror groups can’t function without government sponsorship. 2 blueprints predicted this. One is The Grand Chessboard written in 1998 by Zbingniew Brzezkiniski, the National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter and a co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller. It said that America is going to be hit by Afghan terrorists leading to an Eurasian war [in Central Asia for global government] and a national ID card system home is blatantly in his book. According to pgs. 24-25, the American public won’t be mobilized to follow a new foreign policy unless attacked by a “threat” similar to Pearl Harbor. These sickos were bragging over this since they’ve planned it for decades and many of it are coming into fruition.

The Clash of Ci vilizations (a seminal work done by Samuel P. Huntington) in 1996 proclaimed future global war after the Cold War. Huntington alleged that Western civilization’s power in its population, military, political control, economics, and manufacturing output is shifted toward non-Western nations. This is inevitable to him. China replacing America as Samuel predicts the next superpower. [By trade deals, the West sends its tons of advanced technology like computer software, satellites, military equipment, factories to China, etc.] China’s GDP (gross domestic product) grew from 6% in 1972 to 13.5% in 1993. China’s new appetite is oil and it has now connections to Pakistan and the Middle East. So, Huntington proposes a New World Order in eliminating nation-states. The powers of international institutions (i.e. U.N., European Union, World Bank, etc.) are his source for an answer.







Secondary motives for this “War on Terror” include arms, oil, opium, and the dollar. The Carlyle Group is one of the biggest defense and aerospace contractors on Earth. With the defense budget overflowed, massive arms dealings for nefarious purposes are just here. According to the Moscow Times in January 18, 2002, the Carlyle Group has business ties to BAE System (supplying jets to India in $1.4 billion to cook up tensions between India and Pakistan) The Carlyle Group is present in 55 countries, have ownership stake in 164 companies, and makes $50 million in training the Saudi Arabian National Guard. Knight of Malta Frank Carclucci, George H. W. Bush [now retired], ex-British Prime Minister John Mayor, and others are apart of it. Afghanistan has out of control opium growth. The Taliban once banned the crop in July 2000, but now the Afghan drug czar was kicked out after 9/11. Over 200,000 acres of opium existed less than a year after the bo mbing came up rising about 1400%.

Let’s now look at oil. It’s a known fact that oil is becoming extinct. Even Mike Ruppert of From the Wilderness site confirmed this. Petro-geologist Dr. Colin Campbell wrote that the world’s oil output would peak between the years of 2005-2008. Since most of the planet’s industry is run by oil, war is a process to scramble to get as much as possible. Some scholars even say that there are plenty of oil and the oil crisis is a HOAX so that could be true as well.Afghanistan is the 3rd largest oil producer in the world. Unexplored reserves are worth over $3 trillion exist in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

As early as December 1997, the Taliban met with Unocal, a giant oil company that’s Halliburton based, in Texas to discuss the production of an oil pipeline reported by the BBC’s “Taliban Texas for talks on gas pipeline” on December 4, 1997. Five weeks before 9/11 was there last meeting and no results came so the U.S. planned to invade Afghanistan before September 11th. In June 2001, The News Insight Indian magazine said that Russia and the U.S. were to invade Afghanistan if the Taliban continues to threaten to control the region’s oil supplies. (U.S. Special Forces were in Tajikistan before 9/11 proven by BBC News’ article “U.S. planned attack on Taliban” at September 18, 2001. Bush had plans ready sign also to invade al-Qaeda 2 days before 9/11 in a National Security Presidential Directive)

The BBC’s George Arney reported that former Pakistani Foreign Secretary Niaz Niak was alerted by U.S. officials in mid July 2001 that U.S. military action against Afghanistan would by launched by mid-October. (Because of the Taliban’s refusal to accept Bush’s terms for a trans-Afghan oil pipeline and refusal to hand over Bin Laden). The pipeline is near construction and Unocal was scrambling for a contract recorded in the BBC’s “Afghanistan plans gas pipeline” on May 13, 2002. Karsai then and now is known to advocate the pipeline construction strongly. Unocal is now not in it, but the pipeline deal was signed in December 2002:

“Turkmen President Sapamurat Niyazov, Pakistani Prime Minister Zafarullah Jamali and Afghan President Hamid Karzai finalised a vital gas pipeline agreement here on Thursday [2002-12-26]. The leaders of the three countries would sign the framework agreement to build the 1,500-kilometre Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) gas pipeline project from Turkmenistan's Dauletabad fields across Afghanistan to Pakistan on Friday. — HiPakistan.com” (From http://www.serendipity.li/wtc9.htm

the site says [along with source: India Hindu’s “India invited to join Afghan pipeline project” article written by B. Muralidhar Reddy on February 24, 2003], it will stretch 1500 miles from Turkenmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan to the Indian Ocean.

$3.2 billion is its cost and it could br ing 30 billion cubic meters of Turkmen gas annually. According to Bush’s Statement at from November 28, 2001:

“President's Statement on Caspian Pipeline Consortium
Statement by the President
I congratulate Russia, Kazakhstan, and Oman, and their consortium partners, for the commissioning of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC).

U.S. firms, notably ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil, have played leading roles in this project. These facilities represent the culmination of years of effort. They are examples to the world that the United States, Russia, and Kazakhstan are cooperating to build prosperity and stability in this part of the world. The CPC highlights the important progress by countries in the Caspian region in building a transparent and stable environment for international trade and investment.

The CPC project also advances my Administrations National Energy Policy by developing a network of multiple Caspian pipelines that also includes the B aku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan, Baku-Supsa, and Baku-Novorossiysk oil pipelines and the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipeline. These projects will help diversify U.S. energy supply and enhance our energy security, while supporting global economic growth.” (From http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011128-11.html )

Russia also is to have a piece of the action. This alone vindicates Michael Moore’s pipeline conspiracy fact as half-true (even though the USA doesn’t have a prominent role in its construction now, the pipeline is starting to arise by foreign countries) and refutes Joe Scarborough’s tirade against Moore and his movie.







An April 2001 report by the Baker Institute for Public Policy revealed that the Bush junta’s urge to rid Saddam was to protect their oil interests [Recorded in the Sunday Herald on June 10, 2002 entitled “Official: U.S. oil at the heart of the Iraq crisis”]. The liberals (although I don’t agree with them on every issue are right on the oil being a reason for secondarily. Look at this:

“In this posting I am going to show you that the neo cons at PNAC started planning the Iraq war as early as 1998, if not before then. The current Bush administration says it had nothing to do with oil, yet they state we must protect the oil right in the letter. In the letter they also state that the policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. Here is the list of people who signed the 1998 letter

Elliott Abrams
Richard L. Armitage
William J. Bennett
Jeffrey Bergner
John Bolton
Paula Dobriansky
F rancis Fukuyama
Robert Kagan
Zalmay Khalilzad
William Kristol
Richard Perle
Peter W. Rodman
Donald Rumsfeld
William Schneider, Jr.
Vin Weber
Paul Wolfowitz
R. James Woolsey
Robert B. Zoellick

… That letter was sent to President Clinton on January 26, 1998. Now remember this was January of 1998, now look at what Colin Powell and Condi Rice said about Saddam and Iraq in 2001. [Note by me: Here’s parts of the letter that’s the smoking gun]:

It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard.

As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st ce ntury will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.” (From 216.36.93.7/stewert/viewtopic.php?t=599 andthe PNAC Neo-Con Letter is found at http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm )

Iraq has at least 112 billion barrels of oil reserves and the 2nd largest oil supplier on earth. Newsweek even reported that a puppet government could pump 3 times as much oil than normal levels.

The IMF receives tons of oil profits for a ‘trust fund’ to assist the Iraqi people plus multinational corporations like Halliburton, General Dynamics, United Defense, etc. are working the oil also. Oil is a commodity they grabbed from Iraq to compensate the oil shortages and temporary ease Saudi Arabia’s pressure (Saudi Arabia has ¼ of all petroleum reserves) off their backs. They may even invade Saudi Arabia to completely own their oil as well to further control the region.

Ever since Ri chard Nixon eliminated the gold standard in 1971, the dollar’s value depressed greatly its value. So, the internationalists can create unlimited wealth from nothing and use OPEC oil bought only with U.S. dollars.

The euro is to temporary replace the dollar to ease economic friction then a one-world currency is the final money item. Saudi Arabia has ¼ of all petroleum reserves. These are the secondary reason for the war on terror and the Primary one is to form the N.W.O. of course. Defeating terrorism that’s invented is never-ending since liberties are suppressed in the process and the new world order is growing. Why would they permit this?





Their mindset is that people normally won’t yearn for a one-world system voluntarily neither acquiesces to unending wars (for geo-political reasons not a real threat). They just harvest “terrorists” then cause a crisis to galvanize the people. Individuals later would be easier to control and accept their plans. The Bali bombing, Saudi Arabian attacks, and other events prove that mayhem is adjoined in the 21st century.