New proof of Vietnam War atrocities

Village Voice
New proof of Vietnam War atrocities
Sat Sep 25, 2004 15:23
64.140.158.73

>From the National Archives: New proof of Vietnam War atrocities
Swift Boat Swill
by Nicholas Turse
September 21st, 2004 11:40 AM
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0438/turse.php

John Kerry is being pilloried for his shocking Senate testimony 34
years ago that many U.S. soldiers—not just a few "rogues"—were
committing atrocities against the Vietnamese. U.S. military records
that were classified for decades but are now available in the
National Archives back Kerry up and put the lie to his critics.
Contrary to what those critics, including the Swift Boat Veterans
for Truth, have implied, Kerry was speaking on behalf of many
soldiers when he testified before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee on April 22, 1971, and said this:


They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut off
ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human
genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies,
randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent
of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks,
and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam, in addition
to the normal ravage of war and the normal and very particular
ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.

The archives have hundreds of files of official U.S. military
investigations of such atrocities committed by American soldiers.
I've pored over those records—which were classified for decades—for
my Columbia University dissertation and, now, this Voice article.
The exact number of investigated allegations of atrocities is
unknown, as is the number of such barbaric incidents that occurred
but weren't investigated. Some war crimes, like the Tiger Force
atrocities exposed last year by The Toledo Blade, have only come to
light decades later. Others never will. But there are plentiful
records to back up Kerry's 1971 testimony point by point. Following
(with the names removed or abbreviated) are examples, directly from
the archives:

"They had personally raped"

On August 12, 1967, Specialist S., a military intelligence
interrogator, "raped . . . a 13-year-old . . . female" in an
interrogation hut in a P.O.W. compound. He was convicted of assault
and indecent acts with a child. He served seven months and 16 days
for his crimes.

"Cut off ears"

On August 9, 1968, a seven-man patrol led by First Lieutenant S.
entered Dien Tien hamlet. "Shortly thereafter, Private First Class
W. was heard to shout to an unidentified person to halt. W. fired
his M-16 several times, and the victim was killed. W. then dragged
the body to [the lieutenant's] location. . . . Staff Sergeant B.
told W. to bring back an ear or finger if he wanted to prove himself
a man. W. later went back to the body and removed both ears and a
finger." W. was charged with assault and conduct to the prejudice of
good order and discipline; he was court-martialed and convicted, but
he served no prison time. B. was found guilty of assault and was
fined $50 a month for three months. S. was discharged from the army
before action could be taken against him.

"Cut off heads"

On June 23, 1967, members of the 25th Infantry Division killed two
enemy soldiers in combat in Binh Duong province. An army Criminal
Investigation Division (CID) probe disclosed that "Staff Sergeant H.
then decapitated the bodies with an axe." H. was court-martialed and
found guilty of conduct to the prejudice of good order and
discipline. His grade was reduced, but he served no prison time.


"Taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned
up the power"

On January 10, 1968, six Green Berets in Long Hai, South
Vietnam, "applied electrical torture via field telephones to the
sensitive areas of the bodies of three men and one woman . . . "
Four received reprimands and "Article 15s"—a nonjudicial punishment
meted out by a commanding officer or officer in charge for minor
offenses. A fifth refused to accept his Article 15, and no other
action was taken against him. No action was taken against the sixth
Green Beret.

"Cut off limbs"

A CID investigation disclosed that during late February or early
March 1968 near Thanh Duc, South Vietnam, First Lieutenant L.
ordered soldier K. to shoot an unidentified Vietnamese civilian. "K.
shot the Vietnamese civilian, leaving him with wounds in the chest
and stomach. Soldier B., acting on orders from L., returned to the
scene and killed the Vietnamese civilian, and an unidentified medic
severed the Vietnamese civilian's left arm." No punishment was meted
out because none of the "identified perpetrators" was found to be on
active duty at the time of the June 1971 investigation.

"Blown up bodies"

On February 14, 1969, Platoon Sergeant B. and Specialist R., on a
reconnaissance patrol in Binh Dinh province, "came upon three
Vietnamese males . . . whom they detained and then shot at close
range using M-16 automatic fire. B. then arranged the bodies on the
ground so that their heads were close together. A fragmentation
grenade was dropped next to the heads of the bodies." B. was court-
martialed, convicted of manslaughter, and sentenced to a reduction
in grade and a fine of $97 per month for six months—after which time
he re-enlisted. R. was court-martialed and found not guilty.

"Randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent
of Genghis Khan"

While a U.S. "helicopter hunter-killer team . . . was on a recon
mission in Cambodia," its members fired rockets at buildings
and "engaged various targets [in a small village] with machine-gun
fire. Gunship preparatory fire preceded the landing of a South
Vietnamese army platoon, which had been diverted from another
mission. A U.S. captain accompanied the platoon on the ground in
violation of standing orders. The South Vietnamese troops,
reconnoitering by fire, did not search bunkers for enemy forces, nor
were enemy weapons found. . . . Civilian casualties were estimated
at eight dead, including two children, 15 wounded, and three or four
structures destroyed. There is no evidence that the wounded were
provided medical treatment by either U.S. or South Vietnamese
forces. . . . Members of the South Vietnamese platoon returned to
the aircraft with large quantities of civilian property. . . . The
incident was neither properly investigated nor reported initially."
Letters of reprimand were issued to a lieutenant colonel and a
major. The captain received a letter of reprimand.

John Kerry made it clear when he testified more than three decades
ago that what he told the Senate was the cumulative testimony of
well over 100 "honorably discharged and many very highly decorated"
Vietnam vets who gathered in Detroit in early 1971. Calling their
gathering the Winter Soldier Investigation, they were trying to
raise awareness of the type of war they said America was waging in
Southeast Asia. They were trying to demonstrate that the shocking My
Lai massacre on March 16, 1968, of 567 civilians in a Vietnamese
village—a barbarism unknown to the American public until late 1969—
was not an isolated incident in which rogue troops went berserk, but
simply one of many U.S.-perpetrated atrocities.

All these years later, neither the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth
(SBVT) nor the media feeding their allegations about Kerry's
supposedly "false 'war crimes' charges" even broaches the subject of
Vietnamese suffering, let alone talk about Kerry's exposition of
large-scale atrocities, such as free-fire zones and bombardment of
villages—gross violations of international law cannot simply be
denied or explained away.

Having worked for nearly five years doing research on post-traumatic
stress disorder among Vietnam vets, I understand the intense trauma
experienced by many of them. However, having also spent years
working with U.S. government records of investigations into
atrocities committed against the Vietnamese by U.S. soldiers, it is
patently clear which country suffered more as a result of the war,
and it isn't the U.S., which tragically lost just over 58,000
soldiers. It's Vietnam. Perhaps as many as 2 million Vietnamese
civilians died during the war, and who can even guess at the number
wounded—physically and psychologically.

On its website, the SBVT tries to debunk the Winter Soldier
Investigation by using the same rhetoric that apologists for the
Vietnam War have long employed: They paint the vets who attended the
Detroit meeting as a parade of fake veterans offering false
testimony. "None of the Winter Soldier 'witnesses' Kerry cited in
his Senate testimony less than three months later were willing to
sign affidavits, and their gruesome stories lacked the names, dates,
and places that would allow their claims to be tested," the SBVT
claims. "Few were willing to cooperate with military investigators."

While numerous authors have repeatedly advanced such assertions,
U.S. military documents tell a radically different story. According
to the formerly classified army records, 46 soldiers who testified
at the WSI made allegations that, in the eyes of U.S. Army
investigators, "merited further inquiry." As of March 1972, the
army's CID noted that of the 46 allegations, "only 43 complainants
have been identified" by investigators. "Only" 43 of 46? That means
at least 93 percent of the veterans surveyed were real, not fake.
Moreover, according to official records, CID investigators attempted
to contact 41 people who testified at the Detroit session, which
occurred between January 31 and February 2, 1971. Five couldn't be
located, according to records. Of the remaining 36, 31 submitted to
interviews—hardly the "few" asserted by SBVT. Moreover, as Gerald
Nicosia has noted in his mammoth tome Home to War, "A complete
transcript of the Winter Soldier testimony was sent to the Pentagon,
and the military never refuted a word of it."

The assertion that the vets proved uncooperative and refused to
provide useful, identifiable information has also been a typical
device used to refute the WSI. In this case, the Winter Soldiers
themselves played directly into the hands of their detractors by
trying to have it both ways: They wanted to expose atrocities as a
product of command policy while denying individual soldiers'
responsibility in committing the crimes.

At the WSI, veteran after veteran told of brutal military tactics,
like burning villages and establishing free-fire zones. They offered
blunt, graphic, and often horrific accounts of murder, rape,
torture, mutilation, and indiscriminate violence. But when it came
to perpetrators, the soldiers did not name names. From the outset,
they made it clear that they would not allow their testimony to be
used to, as they put it, scapegoat individual G.I.'s and low-ranking
officers when, they said, it was the war's managers—America's
political and military leadership—who were ultimately to blame for
the atrocities. Because of this stance, some veterans told
investigators after the WSI that they would not offer any further
testimony or would only speak before Congress or a congressional
committee. This stance became a convenient way for the military to
stop work on cases and ignore the charges the anti-war vets had
made.

But in fact—and despite later claims to the contrary by their pro-
war critics—most of the Winter Soldier participants had publicly
given accounts with their own names, unit identifications, dates of
service, and sometimes rather detailed descriptions of locations—
namely, all the information needed to proceed with investigations.
In practically all the specific Winter Soldier cases, such probes
were never done.

=============================
Layer by layer, like peeling the proverbial onion, the truth
is revealed to our incredulous eyes.

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports |
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

WARNING:

While more than 120,000 people "visit" the Tijuana River Estuary and Border Field State Park area each year... About 100,000 of them are illegal aliens who have clambered over the massive border fences and are running north. Another few thousand are taxpayer funded Birkenstockers on "nature quests", their fellow travelers, and ......you.
http://www.borderfieldstatepark.com/borderfield1300.htm 
 


Main Page - Sunday, 09/26/04

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)