heroay
Now the Swiss question 9/11 - Avalanche
Sun Sep 17, 2006 05:56

 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Now the Swiss question 9/11 - Avalanche Warning!
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:24:11 -0600
From: heroay heroay@sbcglobal.net

Someone tell these Swiss people to watch 911 Mysteries! The expose' of the criminal BuShit Gang is ever more daring!... Compared to Michael Moore's 'Farenheit 9-11', '911 Mysteries' is a CALL FOR THE ARREST, TRIAL, AND HANGING OF THE WHOLE BUSHIT GANG OF MURDEROUS TRAITORS, on the spot!!! And really, there is NOTHING to it, were it not for the traitor blackmailed pedophile CON-gress that DOES NOT RESPOND to ThePeople anymore! If it ever did.


----- Original Message -----
From: Cherifa Sirry
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 5:56 PM
Subject: Now the Swiss question 9/11

The Largest Newspaper in Switzerland asks if Bush was behind 9-11

"The more we research, the more we doubt”


BY ELIE PETER
15.09.2006

Swiss version: http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057
English Translation: http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blick.ch%2Fnews%2Fausland%2F9-11%2Fartikel45057&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools


Professor Albert A. Stahel

BY ELIE PETER
15.09.2006 | 12:03: 15


ZURICH – 2,973 humans died with the attacks of 9/11. “Bin Laden” and “Al Qaeda”, the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version.

Now, Swiss university professors Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34) raise hot new questions.

“Something is not correct”, says strategy expert Stahel in “World Week”, and refers to the “incomplete” official US Government 9/11 Report of 2004.

The university professor confirms his criticism in VIEW:

“Osama Bin Laden cannot be ‘the large godfather’ behind the attacks. He did not have enough means of communication”.

Stahel doubts that a passenger airliner crashed into the Pentagon: “For trainee pilots it is actually impossible to crash into the building so exactly. Seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, the World trade center Building 7 next to it also collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Nothing at all is clear.”

Raising questions along with Stahel is historian Dr. Daniele Ganser, his colleague at the University of Zurich.


Dr. Daniele Ganser

Dr. Ganser also calls the official US version “a conspiracy theory”.

“There are 3 theories, which we should treat equally”:


1. “Surprise theory” - Bin Laden and Al Qaeda implemented the attacks.
2. “Let it happen on purpose” - The US Government knew the Al Qaeda plans and did not react in order to legitimize a series of wars.
3. “Made it happen on purpose” - The attacks were actually planned and orchestrated by the Pentagon and/or US secret services. [NO question. THIS IS IT.]


Ganser: “3,000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests. The more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version. It is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. Bush has lied so much already! And we already know that the US government planned an operation in 1962 [Operation Northwood] that was approved by the Pentagon that would have sacrificed innocent US citizens for the government’s own interests.”

As far as Ganser and Stahel go: “We only ask questions.”

911 Mysteries
Some of the innumerable anomalies about the official story of 911.
SOURCES:



#########################################################
"Each man must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country."
-- Mark Twain


9/11 INFO AND LINKS:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm

How to steal an election in one minute
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/steal_an_election.htm


How to steal an election in one minute
Demonstration by Princeton university:
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/how-to-steal-an-election-with-a-diebold-machine-200693.php

-------------

9/11 SPECIAL PROSECUTOR NEEDED,

by Noel Gibeson

About Noel Gibeson http://www.freemarketnews.com/Writers-Bio-Analysis.asp?wid=94

At the Mount Vernon Institute, Noel Gibeson provides research and
consulting services into contemporary issues involving the U.S.
Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence,
international affairs, human rights, the economy, terrorism,
intelligence, homeland security, including counter-terrorism, and
government responsibility and accountability.
Particular emphasis has been in developing an understanding of the
Islamic fundamentalist; his mindset, his world view.
At Georgetown University, he taught government courses as they
relate to technology, intelligence, counter-intelligence,
counter-terrorism and space issues. One course called Intelligence and
American Foreign Policy, examined unclassified, open-source documents
and the steps in the intelligence cycle up to and including preparation
of the National Intelligence Estimate. Discussed how different federal
organizations, such as the FBI, State Department, Defense Department,
and CIA, conduct their own intelligence activities and how well they do
or do not share information. Discussed why intelligence information is
important to policy makers in foreign policy decision-making. Students
included undergraduate and graduate students (including PhD students) as
well as foreign and US diplomats.

http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/94/5982/911.asp?wid=94&nid=5982


9/11 SPECIAL PROSECUTOR NEEDED, by Noel Gibeson

Friday, September 15, 2006
I understand the average person's reluctance not to believe that
the U.S. government was involved in 9/11 because I was there myself
not too long ago. But I am not another leftwing wacko who believes in
unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. To the contrary, I am a life-long
member of the Republican Party, someone who twice voted for George W.
Bush (now a mistake), someone who has contributed money to Republican
political candidates and the Republican National Committee. I am also a
Federalist Society member and one believes in scientific methodology
over intuition. But justice and fidelity to the Constitution are more
important than party loyalty in a case like this; in getting to the
truth behind what really happened on 9/11 and in convicting those
Americans who are guilty of causing it.
The accountability of our limited government to the People of the
United States is the cornerstone of the U.S. Constitution and we choose
to exercise that right here and now!
We do not want to believe that our own federal government may
have conspired and murdered other Americans to justify the Global War on
Terror and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Such information
destroys our concept of self and our worldview. However, the truth is
the truth and it cannot be hidden any longer. Now, some CIA officers are
buying legal insurance to cover the cost of their defense should they be
indicted by a federal grand jury for their roles in 9/11. They
are worried that the results of an internal CIA investigation into some
CIA agents' roles in 9/11 may soon become public and the public outcry
would immediately lead to their arrest for murder and conspiracy among
other charges.
CIA officers who are charged with something that was done in the line of
duty, i.e., for something that is constitutional and legal; are defended
by the largest law firm in the world; the U.S. Justice Department.
However, for illegal and unconstitutional charges they are on their own.
That is why this private legal insurance has suddenly become so
attractive to some employees of the CIA; they know that they will not be
defended by the Justice Department because what they did was so illegal
and reprehensible. That is why they are busy buying private
legal insurance. For a well-researched, excellent article found in the
mainstream media see the Washington Post for R. Jeffrey Smith's story
titled, "CIA Officers Buy Legal Insurance" here.
Further, military personnel and federal officials are admonished
to refuse any order that is unlawful because such an order is contrary
to law and to the U.S. Constitution. They are held to account if they
carry-out an unlawful order and are then prosecuted. The dictum is: one
follows lawful orders, but refuses unlawful orders. That is what some
people who got involved in staging the 9/11 false-flag incidents should
have remembered and done; they should have refused unlawful orders. Now
it is too late and they will soon be brought to justice. So will all
others who planned and conspired to carry out these dastardly deeds.
And what deeds are those? First, the planning and destruction of the two
twin WTC towers by airliners and explosive charges and the explosive,
controlled demolition of WTC-7 (the third WTC building destroyed that
day), the attack on the Pentagon by either a drone or a cruise missile
(not an airliner as advertised), and the murder of almost 3000 people,
mostly Americans. Prosecutors need to get to the bottom of why none of
the 19 hijackers' names appeared on any of the four airplanes' flight
manifests and why some of these so-called terrorists apparently have
since turned up in the Middle East and have been granting interviews. In
five years, the FBI never added these 19 names to the flight manifest.
Why? Prosecutors need to subpoena the FBI to obtain the video recordings
near the Pentagon attack from the navy gas station and the I-395 traffic
cameras that actually photographed the incoming flight before it struck
the Pentagon. And this is just the beginning. There are many, many other
valid questions that need to be asked and answered. The following is
based on scientific methodology and not a Ouija board.

What is it that we know?
First, WTC-7, which was about 350 feet from the twin towers, fell
down without ever having being hit by an aircraft, debris, or anything
else. So unless we are to believe that it fell down because of some
special steel-eating termites unique only to New York City, then there
must be another explanation for its collapse. There is. According to
American physics professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University's
physics department, WTC-7 was destroyed by a controlled thermate
demolition that brought down the building within its own footprint.
Thermate charges were used to quickly slice through the structural steel
of the building much the way a warm knife slices through butter.
Thermate is created by adding sulphur to thermite thus creating a more
potent version of thermite; and a faster steel cutting outcome. Thermate
leaves a measurable sulphur residue. In the debris, sulphur residue in
the correct proportions for thermate was found in the debris of WTC-7,
along with molten steel that was stilling glowing a month later in the
rubble. Only thermate could bring steel to such a high temperature for
such a long period of time that it would still be glowing a month later;
aviation fuel or anything else found in the debris will not do that.
For more physics information see the "Journal of 911 Studies" here and
the "Physics911 Public Site" here.
Second, the so-called 'airliner' that crashed into the Pentagon seems to
be one of the biggest mysteries of all and one with some distinct
inconsistencies. According to the first Arlington County
deputy fire chief to arrive on the scene, the impact only left about a
ten foot hole in the wall which was then quickly covered up by blue
tarps. All the black smoke filmed on that day was caused by the burning
tires of the Pentagon helicopter pad fire truck. Later, however, once
the blue tarps were removed that damage appeared to be much greater than
that initially reported by the first-on-the scene deputy fire chief,
although it was still not as big if a Boeing 757 had actually hit the
building. French electrical engineering professor Jean-Pierre
Desmoulins has done a detailed analysis of the Pentagon crash and
concludes that it could not have been hit by a Being 757, such as
American Airlines flight # 77. So what actually did hit the Pentagon?
Immediately after the crash, the FBI confiscated all the
videotapes from the nearby cameras located at the navy gas station and
the I-395 traffic cameras within minutes after the impact. Were they
waiting – standing by – to do that? These cameras had a view of
whatever it was that actually hit the Pentagon that day. Fives
years later the FBI still refuses to release these videotapes to the
public, the People of the United States, for whom the government works.
This casts a deep pall of suspicion over what is on these tapes and why
the FBI keeps stonewalling. Certainly there is no need for
the FBI to continue to hide these videos from the so-called terrorists
so it appears that they are hiding the truth only from the American
People and the People now demand to see these videos un-doctored and
unedited.
Concerning the inbound aircraft or missile, witnesses near the
Pentagon in Arlington, VA on 9/11 reported either hearing nothing at all
or they reported hearing a whishing sound immediately before impact.
That, combined with the size of the initial impact lead some to believe
that either a cruise missile or drone hit the Pentagon painted to look
like an American Airlines aircraft (for cameras and witness testimony).
Further and more significantly, an engineer has demonstrated that the
actual flight trajectory would be impossible for a Boeing 757hitting the
Pentagon.
An important concomitant question is: If a 757 did not hit the
Pentagon, what happened to the people onboard American Airlines flight #
77? Where are they?
For more engineering information visit these two sites:
http://perso.orange.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/pages-en/im-1stlev.html
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/pages-en/im-2ndlev.html
Federal prosecutors of high integrity such as Patrick Fitzgerald
will always listen, investigate and get to the bottom of all the lies.
Clearly there is a plethora of crimes to investigate and federal
officials who need to be brought to justice up to and including the
President of the United States.
The Whitewash 9/11 Commission did what it was supposed to do: fix
blame for 9/11 on foreign terrorists, not domestic terrorists. This
whitewash was designed, in part, to legitimize the illegitimate and
unjust imperial wars in Iraq and in Afghanistan. It did not address the
role of the federal government in causing the 9/11 murders of American
citizens by their own government; that was not part of their charter. It
did not address the fact that the government may have facilitated this
disaster. Their investigation is entirely inadequate.
By way of qualification, not all of the federal government is
involved in the events surrounding the 9/11 black operation; only a
handful of rogue elements would be involved in an operation like this.
They may view themselves as super-patriots; doing what is necessary to
protect America against terrorists in spite of the Constitution and the
laws of this land. They created a galvanizing event – like the attack
on Pearl Harbor – to unify popular support for the Global War on
Terror and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. They succeeded!
There are many others who were not involved in these plots but have
been suppressed by those who were. Now it is now time to come forward to
prosecutors or risk getting caught up in what is certain to follow and
perhaps being mistakenly identified as someone who is an actual
conspirator. If necessary, they can be protected by whistleblower
statutes or a witness protection program. Whatever they know is needed
to prosecute these murderers. Even if they think that whatever they know
is unimportant, they need to contact prosecutors and let them decide and
allow them connect the dots.
Federal prosecutors need to take stories about


Main Page - Monday, 09/18/06

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES

messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)