9-11 truth "Infog"? All sites
Sun Sep 16, 2007 19:18

Bill Douglas, author of “The Amateur Parent – A Book on Life, Death, War & Peace, and Everything Else in the Universe”


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Are most of 9-11 truth "Infog"? All sites Tarpley recommends as influential are registered through the same server -- 911blogger.com is blocking report of discovery
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:54:58 -0700
From: Dick Eastman olfriend@nwinfo.net

"Infog" -- def.: Infiltrated False-Opposition Gate Keepers

Are most of 9-11 truth "Infog"? All sites Tarpley recommends as influential are registered through the same server -- 911blogger.com is blocking report of discovery

From: Steven T. Hatton
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [9-11-NeXuS] Who Owns 9/11 Truth?

>On Wednesday 12 September 2007 23:45, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
> In trying to sort out what is really going on vis-a-vis the KW affair, I
> started looking into the various sites and individuals specifically named
> by Tarpley as possible agents of influence. I have discovered some very
> curious facts about certain 9/11 sites. Notice that all the sites listed
> below are registered through the same service. Do we go with coincidence
> theory here?
> http://vehme.blogspot.com/2007/09/who-owns-911-truth.html
> I had attempted to copy the content of that blog to 911blogger.com, but so
> far the blog has not been approved.
> Names to be on the watch for are:
> Arabesque,
> Michael Wolsey,
> Cosmos,
> Jenny Sparks,
> and, as much as I hate to say this, Victoria Ashley(victronix).
> Jon Gold's ybbs.com site also has an interesting registration record. My
> bone to pick with Jon is personal, at this point, so I'm not going to make
> a big fuss about the anomaly. It is significant enough to mention,
> however.

The evidence just keeps getting stronger.

Registrant:Domains by Proxy, Inc.
15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
Domain Name: 911BLOGGER.COM

Registrant:Domains by Proxy, Inc.
Domain Name: VISIBILITY911.COM

Registrant:Domains by Proxy, Inc.

Registrant:Domains by Proxy, Inc.
Domain Name: 911TRUTH.ORG

Registrant:Domains by Proxy, Inc.

Registrant:Domains by Proxy, Inc.

"Whoever controls the histories of nations controls those nations and their
peoples." Germar Rudolf

Results 1 - 10 of about 6,180,000 for 9/11 INVESTIGATION


Results 1 - 10 of about 12,000 for APFN WTC 9/11 INVESTIGATION

WTC: STRANGER THAN FICTION - 3 visits - 11/6/06
AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM ...... 9-11 Attack on America http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC.htm  ...
www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm  - 214k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
[ More results from www.apfn.org  ]
Q The investigation of the WTC “is a half-baked farce.” - Fire Engineering Magazine. .... APFN 9/11 INFO AND LINKS: http://www.apfn.org/APFN/WTC.HTM  ...
www.apfn.net/Messageboard/02-11-05/discussion.cgi.45.html  - 24k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
David Ray Griffin - 9/11 Commission Report
After Andrew Card reported the second crash on the World Trade Center, the president just .... Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN] ...
www.apfn.net/messageboard/02-11-05/discussion.cgi.56.html  - 19k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
[ More results from www.apfn.net  ]
911 - The Citizens' Investigation Continues
Scandal Inside the FBI: Did G-Men Miss the Boat on 9-11? ... 911 Terror in America http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC.htm  APFN - Just One Problem with ...
www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/citizens_investagation.htm  - 27k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
Letter to Swiss Re
The controlled demolition theory of the collapse of WTC North and South Tower is ... Why has there been no investigation on the part of the 9/11 Commission? ...
www.serendipity.li/wot/lehrman.htm  - 27k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on ...
"The Final Secret of 9/11" [APFN link expired]. Instead of an open inquiry into what ... Philadelphia Inquirer, 2004-01-29: Editorial | 9/11 Investigation ...
www.serendipity.li/wtc_postscript.htm  - 21k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
Digg - 9/11 Commission Report
Still thinking the 9/11 Commission really investigated and disclosed what ... http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC.htm http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm  ...
digg.com/political_opinion/9_11_Commission_Report - 33k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
This question was conspicuously absent from the official investigation. ... 9/11 info and links..... http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm  ...
disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=234999;article=1580;title=APFN%20MESSAGE%20BOARD - 14k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
BEST 911 Investigation sites: http://www.geocities.com/anitaalittle/archiveprior_knowledge.html  http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm ...
www.cyberspaceorbit.com/coyupup.htm  - 15k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this


From: “William Douglas”


[Please share with media, and everyone else]

Exposing the 9/11 Conspiracy Wingnuts

I began researching the mainstream media coverage of the controversy regarding the attacks of 9/11/2001, when reading an article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Newspaper, dated June 29th, 2006. It was titled, “Sept. 11 claim stirs UW probe — Instructor says U.S. planned the attacks to provoke war.” This led to my discovery of some wild conspiracy theorists that endanger our government and media establishments, with quite frankly insane assertions. I’ll address this in full in the final paragraph.

Then by using a “google video 9/11" search, I recently viewed a FOX News interview on Hannity and Colmes with an Arab Studies teacher from the University of Wisconsin named Kevin Barrett. I had earlier seen an interview with another, a professor named James Fetzer, University of Minnesota Duluth. A few weeks earlier I had seen an interview on MSNBC Scarborough country interviewing a Mike Berger representing 911Truth.org.

Some of these guests referred to an organization called “Scholars for 9/11 Truth” with a website www.st911.org, which offered a physics research paper questioning the official explanation of the events of 9/11/2001. While visiting this site, I read that they pointed to the temperatures of the fires in the WTC buildings, and construction of the buildings, and the speed they fell, as evidence they claimed proved that what we saw on 9/11/2001 when the towers fell had to have been the result of a controlled demolition. Like the ones we’ve seen with Las Vegas hotels being brought down. Their claim was that the WTC buildings could not have been caused solely by the aircraft hitting the WTC buildings that day.

Then, I contacted the office of a Wisconsin State Legislator, Rep. Stephen Nass (R-Whitewater), and asked to speak to someone in the office who could speak on this issue. I asked if he was familiar with the Scholars for 9/11 Truth website, and he replied they had learned of it this week. I asked him if he and the Representative could comment on the charge that the fires on 9/11/2001 in the WTC buildings did not burn hot enough to bring down the buildings, and if he’d read the scholars organization’s charge that thermate traces had been found on debris from the fallen towers (thermate indicating demolition type explosives were involved). The gentleman responded that no, they had not looked at this information, and this would not be something they would look at, further indicating that anyone who made such charges was blinded by their hatred of President Bush.

Which leads back to the interviews of guests on the three television news programs. The main theme of all three of the guests on these programs appeared to be concern of the physical evidence of 9/11/2001, mentioned above and particularly regarding the collapse of three of the World Trade Center buildings on that day.

The main themes of the interviewers on these programs appeared to be two-fold:
1) The guests were representing a fringe movement, and most Americans do not dispute the official 9/11 explanation of the 19 hijackers defeating US military and intelligence forces on 9/11/2001.
2) The guests and those they speak for, who question the official 9/11/2001 account, are of questionable sanity

This motivated me to do some research. First I looked at the fringe movement issue that the majority of Americans disagreed with the programs guests and accept the official explanation, and secondly, the sanity and expertise of people like their guests who question the official story of 9/11/2001.

First, regarding the fringe issue, asserting that the guests questioning the events of 9/11 reflected a small minority of American opinion. I looked at the only polls I could find on these questions, and the results were surprising. A CNN viewers poll, which is not scientific, held Wednesday, November 10th, 2005, asked, “Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11?” 89% replied “Yes,” they did believe there was a cover-up by the U.S. Government (9,441 votes), while only 12% felt there was no cover-up. In a national Zogby poll, of May 2006, found that 45%, of the American public felt a new 9/11 investigation should be launched because “so many unanswered questions about 9/11 remain that Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success.” An earlier Zogby poll of New York City residents, from August of 2004, found that Half (49.3%) of New Yorkers felt that U.S. government officials “knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act.” While 66% of New Yorkers called for a new probe of Unanswered Questions by Congress or New York’s Attorney General.

Now to the second issue the television media interviewers were most concerned with, which was the expertise and sanity of the people demanding a new 9/11 investigation, and some even suggesting possible U.S. government complicity in the attacks of 9/11/2001. Again, a simple google “video 9/11" search, provided a wealth of information. This too yielded some surprising results.

One of the loudest advocates of the most damning charge that “members of the U.S. government actually orchestrated the events of 9/11 to fool the nation into unpopular wars”, was not a tree-hugging Green Party activist, but rather a prominent Republican, in fact a Former Chief Economist under George Bush, and professor at Texas A&M, Morgan Reynolds. www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

Google research of the growing list of other 9/11 skeptics of the official story, some “convinced of U.S. government involvement,” while others not going that far, but pointing out that”the official story is highly questionable and demands further investigation,” yielded surprising results. Including a host of high level Republican administration officials, defense experts, intelligence experts, and respected scholars, as well as well known celebrities who are now adding the spotlight of their names to the issue of 9/11. Among them were:

Former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S.
Air Force, under President Reagan, and combat fighter pilot Col. Robert Bowman (Caltech Phd in aeronautics and nuclear engineering). video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674

Former CIA Intelligence Advisor to Reagan and George HW Bush and
founder of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, Ray McGovern

Kevin Ryan, former department head at UL (Underwriter Laboratories) the company which certified the steel which went into the WTCs upon their construction, and inspected it after the WTC collapses in 2001.

Former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury Senior Research
Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Research Fellow at Stanford’s Independent Institute,
and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, Paul Craig Roberts

Canadian National Defense Minister, the Honourable Paul Hellyer

Minister for the Environment, and Member of Parliament (United Kingdom) Michael Meacher

National Minister of Defense (Germany). Also, served as Minister of Technology Andreas Von Bulow

Former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces, and chief of the
department for General affairs in the Soviet Union ‘s ministry of Defense, General
Leonid Ivashov

Former MI6 British Counter Intelligence Officer, David Shayler

Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, former Marine Corps officer, author or editor of more than 20
books, and co-chair of Scholars For 9/11 Truth, James Fetzer

Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, and co-chair of
Scholars For 9/11 Truth, Steven Jones

Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion & Theology, Claremont
Graduate University, and author or editor of some 30 books, including “The New Pearl Harbor” and “The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions” David Ray Griffin

Professor of mathematics, University of Western Ontario, and founder
of the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven (SPINE), A.K Dewdney

Aircraft crash investigation authority, USAF Col. (Ret) George Nelson

Former chief Pentagon arms negotiator for the Middle East, USAF Col.
(Ret) Don de Grand-Pre

Actor Charlie Sheen (Platoon, Wall Street, etc.)

Actor, Ed Asner

Actor, Ed Begley, Jr


So, now that we’ve examined the two main issues of concern for the television news interviewers, which was the “fringe” aspect of the questioners, and the “sanity/expertise” issue, it appears those arguments are very weak arguments, really with no merit at all. Obviously tens of millions of Americans, according to polls, want a new investigation into 9/11/2001 and have a strong suspicion of U.S. government involvement at some level. Obviously not all of the national defense, intelligence, aeronautics, physics and engineering experts questioning the official story of 9/11 are insane or unqualified to comment.

This begs the question, in the face of such obvious facts, why do our media personalities continue to attempt to throw out accusations that are patently untrue regarding those who question the official story? When a television news interviewer continues to ask questions and make asser

Main Page - Monday  09/17/07

Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]


messageboard.gif (4314 bytes)