FEMA and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited
Kurt Nimmo, Another Day in the Empire
September 8,2005
If you believe the corporate media, FEMA is simply a bungling
and inept emergency management agency and its director, Michael
Brown, according to the Washington Post, is simply an
"accidental director" and "the failed head of an Arabian horse
sporting group who was plucked from obscurity to become
President Bush's point man for the worst natural disaster in
U.S. history" and, as the Boston Globe notes, "got the job
through an old college friend who at the time was heading up
FEMA.... Brown -- formerly an estates and family lawyer -- this
week has made several shocking public admissions, including
interviews where he suggested FEMA was unaware of the misery and
desperation of refugees stranded at the New Orleans convention
center." In short, the corporate media would have us believe
Brown is a clueless lawyer and former horse trader and FEMA an
unresponsive federal bureaucratic leviathan wrapped up in red
tape. But this does not explain the following:
FEMA refused evacuation help from Amtrak; it turned away
experienced fire fighters and first responders; it turned back
Wal-Mart supply trucks; refused to allow the Red Cross to
deliver food; blocked a 500-boat citizen flotilla from
delivering aid; turned away generators and other equipment (see
this page with links to news stories). In other words, FEMA went
out of its way to deny aid and allow people to die from
dehydration, starvation, and lack of medicine and medical help.
In addition to denying aid, and thus killing an as of yet (and
possibly forever) unknown number of people, FEMA is attempting
to control media access to the worst natural disaster in
American history (see Journalist Groups Protest FEMA Ban on
Photos of Dead). Moreover, journalists and photographers have
been assaulted by troops and had their notebooks and cameras
confiscated (see The Eye of the Hurricane by Matthias Gebauer).
Regardless of all the corporate media hype, FEMA was not created
to respond to natural disasters and help American citizens (in
fact, it is an unconstitutional construct, created by Executive
Order, and draws its "lawful" facade not from the American
people, but the fact Executive Order 12148 was published in the
Federal Registry). "FEMA has only spent about 6 percent of its
budget on national emergencies, the bulk of their funding has
been used for the construction of secret underground facilities
to assure continuity of government in case of a major emergency,
foreign or domestic," writes Harry V. Martin. "General Frank
Salzedo, chief of FEMA's Civil Security Division stated in a
1983 conference that he saw FEMA's role as a 'new frontier in
the protection of individual and governmental leaders from
assassination, and of civil and military installations from
sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident
groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience
in times of crisis.'" In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, a lot of
criticism is focused on FEMA, but this is not the first time the
agency has taken heat for "dropping the ball" after natural
disasters. Martin writes:
FEMA's deceptive role really did not come to light with much of
the publi...il Hurricane Andrew smashed into the U.S. mainland.
As Russell R. Dynes, director of the Disaster Research Center of
the University of Delaware, wrote in The World and I, "...The
eye of the political storm hovered over the Federal Emergency
Management Agency. FEMA became a convenient target for
criticism." Because FEMA was accused of dropping the ball in
Florida, the media and Congress commenced to study this agency.
What came out of the critical look was that FEMA was spending 12
times more for "black operations" than for disaster relief. It
spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United
States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or
domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress, only
members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion
expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These
few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain"
around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security
programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency
Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars
before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979.
One such black op was REX-84 (Alpha Explan, or Readiness
Exercise 1984), exposed by the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987, and
described as "a secret government within a government."
Iran-Contra criminal Oliver North "worked closely with FEMA to
redraw national contingency plans dealing with nearly everything
from nuclear attack to civil insurrection," explains totse.com
(FEMA: Blueprint For Tyranny). "FEMA's action plan included the
declaration of martial law, suspension of the Constitution and
aggressive moves against dissenters. A trigger could be 'violent
and widespread internal dissent.' This plan and its failure to
clearly define a national crisis caused Attorney General Smith
to issue an official protest. The Herald reported that on Aug.
2, 1984, Smith emphatically expressed to National Security
Advisor Robert 'Bud' McFarlane his alarm over FEMA's 'expansion
of the definition of severe emergency to encompass "routine"
domestic law enforcement emergencies.'" Under Reagan, Louis O.
Giuffrida, "a stealth-obsessed ex-California National Guard
officer who preferred to be addressed according to his former
rank in that organization," as Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen
describe him, oversaw FEMA. During the late sixties and early
seventies, Giuffrida served as then California governor Reagan's
terrorism advisor and at Reagan's request founded the California
Specialized Training Institute, a school for police and military
commandos. "Giuffrida and [Edwin] Meese (then Governor Reagan's
chief assistant) helped develop a plan to purge California of
its militant and peaceful protesters," Vankin and Whalen write.
"Operation Cable Splicer, a variation of the Army Garden Plot, a
'domestic counterinsurgency' scheme, spied on suspected radicals
and marshaled maximum force to squash riots and legitimate
demonstrations alike."
It appears Hurricane Katrina has provided FEMA with an excuse to
"dry run" its unconstitutional powers in New Orleans, rounding
up "refugees" (now called "evacuees") and "relocating" them in
various camps. "Some evacuees are being treated as 'internees'
by FEMA," writes former NSC employee Wayne Madsen. "Reports
continue to come into WMR that evacuees from New Orleans and
Acadiana [the traditional twenty-two parish Cajun homeland] who
have been scattered across the United States are being treated
as 'internees' and not dislocated American citizens from a
catastrophe. Some FEMA facilities are preventing these internees
from leaving on their own. Reports of mandatory registration and
the issuing of FEMA ID cards suggest that FEMA, an agency that
is rife with right-wing security goons and severely lacking in
humanitarian workers, has other motives in treating poor and
destitute American citizens as prisoners in their own country."
Call it REX-84 revisited.
"The disaster that struck New Orleans and the southern Gulf
Coast has given rise to the largest military mobilization in
modern history on US soil. Nearly 65,000 US military personnel
are now deployed in disaster area, transforming the devastated
port city into a war zone," writes Bill Van Auken. "While no
doubt incompetence and indifference played a major role [in the
supposedly bungled aid effort], there is also strong evidence
that aid was deliberately withheld by the White House and the
Pentagon as part of a strategy for asserting unfettered military
control over the city.... the US ruling elite and both major
parties have used September 11 as the pretext for implementing
far-reaching attacks on democratic rights and breaching legal
barriers -- such as Posse Comitatus -- against the use of
military force against the American people." Van Auken mentions
"that US military's Northern Command had developed a series of
'war plans' for the military 'to take charge' in domestic
crises" allegedly in response to "supposed terrorist attacks,
including the detonation of a nuclear device in a major American
city" and "the catastrophe that struck New Orleans provided
ideal conditions for testing the plans out."
Finally, as a corollary of the FEMA-Pentagon operations in New
Orleans (as opposed to the soft and squishy and apparently
endless corporate media spin about displaced people finding
solace in private homes and humanitarian shelters), see Don
Nash's Refugees from New Orleans behind barbed wire in Utah and
I just got back from a FEMA Detainment Camp, the latter posted
by a Christian man who attempted to deliver aid to Louisiana
"refugees" (or detainees) in Oklahoma and was turned away by
FEMA bureaucrats.
*******************************************************************************************************************************
LET'S STOP KIDDING OURSELVES! 9-11 was an Israeli-backed
spanking on our
collective American bottom! A Boeing 757 DIDN'T pierce through
six walls of the
Pentagon (impossible + no aircraft debris), a late model cruise
missile did the job;
the Twin Towers DIDN'T collapse due to heat (impossible),
demolition charges
did the job; there were NO Arab hijackers (the jets were guided
electronically);
and the Zionists/Judeo-Christians now in control of the United
States are traitors
to the U.S. Constitution... as well as being mass murderers.This
has been a Zionist
WAG THE DOG operation from the start, deadly serious for our
elected leaders
WHO KNOW WHO'S GUILTY, and an Arabian Nights charade for Mom and
Pop
in Littletown, U.S.A.! It's an info war! Forward this to the
world!
henrithecelt@gci.net
AMERICAN CAMPS.....
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/camps.htm