Leahy Threatens Bush Aides With Contempt
JESSE J. HOLLAND | August 20, 2007 11:54 PM EST |
WASHINGTON — A top Senate Democrat on Monday threatened to hold
members of the Bush administration in contempt for not producing
subpoenaed information about the legal justification for
President Bush's secretive eavesdropping program.
"When the Senate comes back in the session, I'll bring it up
before the committee," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. and
chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I prefer
cooperation to contempt. Right now, there's no question that
they are in contempt of the valid order of the Congress."
Leahy's committee on June 27 subpoenaed the Justice Department,
National Security Council and the offices of the president and
vice president for documents relating to the National Security
Agency's legal justification for the wiretapping program.
White House lawyer Fred Fielding, in a Monday letter to Leahy,
said that the administration needed more time.
Top News
Top Posts
Entertainment: David Ehrenstein: Mervgate!
Living Now: Albertina Rizzo: On Impulse
Media: Chris Kelly: Learning to Loathe Yourself: Peggy Noonan
and How To Be a Conservative Pundit
Politics: Chris Kelly: Learning to Loathe Yourself: Peggy Noonan
and How To Be a Conservative Pundit
Business: Dan Solin: Breaking News: The Markets Aren't Volatile!
Business: Capital One To Close Mortgage Unit, Lay Off 1,900
Media: Blogger Files Complaint Against Sen. Thompson
Entertainment: The Worst Screen Couplings Of All Time, Topped By
Star Wars
Living Now: Yawn Away: Urge For Post-Lunch Naps 100% Normal
Politics: Leahy: Cheney Told GOP-Led Congress
It Wasn't 'Allowed To Issue Subpoenas'
"A core set of highly sensitive national security and related
documents we have so far identified are potentially subject to
claims of executive privilege and that a more complete
collection and review of all materials responsive to the
subpoenas will require additional time," Fielding said.
The Washington Post reported on its Web site Monday that Vice
President Dick Cheney's office had acknowledged it had dozens of
memos and orders related to the wiretapping program, including
43 separate authorizations from Bush and 10 legal memoranda from
the Justice Department.
While Cheney's counsel, Shannen W. Coffin, said the documents
"may be responsive" to the Senate committee's demands, he gave
no indication that the vice president's office was likely to
hand them over without a struggle, the Post reported.
Leahy said his committee had waited long enough.
"It has been almost two months since service of the subpoenas,
three weeks since the time they asked for additional time. And
still, we have nothing at all," Leahy said.
Leahy also questioned whether the Senate would again reauthorize
laws that expand the government's authority to spy on foreigners
without the subpoenaed information.
Congress, before it left for its August recess, approved an
update to the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
allowing the government to eavesdrop on terror suspects overseas
without first getting a court warrant.
The overhaul was the result of a recent Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court ruling that banned eavesdropping on
foreigners when their messages were routed though communications
carriers based in the United States.
The provisions expire after six months, but the White House
wants them made permanent.
"For Congress to legislate effectively in this area, it has to
have full information about the executive branch's
interpretations of FISA," Leahy said. "We cannot, and certainly,
we should not legislate in the dark, where the administration
hides behind a fictitious veil of secrecy."
The White House said it was not looking for a conflict with
Congress over FISA.
"Extending and modernizing FISA is critical to our national
security, and our intelligence professionals consider it
imperative that we do not weaken the tools they feel are
necessary to protect America's national security interests,"
White House spokesman Tony Fratto said.
Leahy also indicated that the committee would continue to seek
recently resigned White House adviser Karl Rove's appearance on
the U.S. attorney firings.
Fielding has said President Bush would invoke executive
privilege to keep Rove from answering questions or submitting
documents to Senate Judiciary Committee. The committee has been
investigating whether the White House ordered the prosecutor
firings in ways that might help Republicans in elections.
"I don't think he had a valid claim of executive privilege,
because all the testimony has been it wasn't discussed with the
president. If it wasn't discussed with the president, there's no
executive privilege," Leahy said. "And they've just lost the
other claim they could make that he's too important to the
operation of the White House to be able to take time to testify.
That's not going to be the case anymore."
___
On the Net:
Senate Judiciary Committee:
http://judiciary.senate.gov
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070820/democrats-subpoenas/