APFN post
The Big Lie of Flight 93
Sun Aug 22, 2004 00:12
69.43.20.46

Jon Carlson
PROVEN: The Big Lie of Flight 93!
Sat Jul 24, 2004 00:27
69.43.12.129


UNITED AIRLINE PIECE:
http://www.wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html 
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

NOTICE THE TIME DATE. "Flight 93" was supposed to have crashed around 10 a.m
and "Flight 175" was supposed to have struck the South Tower at 9:02 a.m.

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland
Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb
aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White. White said the plane had been moved to
a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many
people were aboard the flight.
United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175,
a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.

INN World Report analyst Woody Box, reporting on the deplaning procedures at
Hopkins Airport, found solid evidence that 200 passengers were onboard not
the 33 passengers claimed by major media sources.
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=323 
One hypothesis suggests the 200 passengers deplaned in Cleveland represent
the AA 11, Flight 175, and Flight 93 passengers combined. Flight 11 and
Flight 175 Boeing 767 airliners were claimed by major media sources to have
crashed into the North and South WTC Towers, respectively. That hypothesis
has Flight 175 landing at Newark to transfer passengers from AA Flight 11
and Flight 175 to Flight 93. Major media sources claimed Flight 93 was
delayed 41 minutes, the amount of time that would have been needed to
transfer passengers from Flight 175.

This hypothesis brings up the question, "Where did the airliners that struck
the Towers come from?" According to the Operation Northwoods plan discussed
below they would be remotely-controlled drones with no passengers. Photos of
the South Tower airliner shows bulges on the understructure. The bulge in
the wing area of the body indicates Predator state-of-the-art remote-control
capability.
http://www.rense.com/general41/spain.htm 
http://www.81x.com/Authors/green1/Bild7_details1.JPG 
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/third.html 
http://www.the-movement.com/essays/fireball.htm 


BOOK EXCERPT p.82
According to secret and long-hidden documents obtained for BODY OF SECRETS
by James Bamford, the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved
...OPERATION NORTHWOODS, which had the written approval of the chairman and
every member of the JCS, called for innocent people to be shot on American
streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high
seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C.,
Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not
commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be
blamed on Castro, thus giving JCS Chairman Lemnitzer and his cabal the
excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they need to launch
their war.

BOOK EXCERPT p. 85-6 (Portion of Operation Northwoods related to Flight
93)
An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate
for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization
in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted
for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected
passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual
registered aircraft would be converted to a drone (a remotely controlled
unmanned aircraft). Take-off time of the drone aircraft and the actual
aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida.

>From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to
miimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Elgin AFB where
arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the
aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue
to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting
on the international distress frequency a "May Day" msessage stating he is
under attack by Cuban MiG aircrafgt. The transmission will be interrupted by
destruction of the aircraft, which will be triggered by radio signal. This
will allow ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) radio stations
in the Western Hemisphere to tell the U.S. what has happened to the aircraft
instead of the U.S. trying to "sell" the incident.

IN A NUTSHELL, Flight 93 with passengers deplaned in Cleveland while a
duplicate aircraft was blown up by radio signal.

Numerous witnesses of the "Flight 93" explosion and crash sighted a small
white jet that no doubt pulled the trigger.

BACKGROUND ON THE SAAB JET:
Information and Photos of the Saab 105 SK60 series military jet:

http://user.tninet.se/~xpz458v/SAAB105-SK60_english.htm 
http://www.canit.se/~griffon/aviation/text/60saab105.html 
http://www.canit.se/~griffon/aviation/img/saab/ 

This plane fits the description given by eye witnesses. It is a 2 seater
allowing one person to pilot in tight formation right above the airliner and
another person to remote-control the other plane. The plane
remote-controlled to Australia had a second plane monitoring it apparently
capable of adjusting directions if the original computer flight plan failed.
Obviously a jet not normally flown in this country would be hard to
identify. It has a top speed of over 1000 mph and is extremely maneuverable.
The Austria Air Force flies them as does Sweden.

Interesting that the Flight 93 Mirror article mentions a small WHITE jet
that several witnesses saw but the FBI claims to be a 'business jet" or
never existed. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143 

http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm 

"There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on
top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it
just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back
of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it
on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI
came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.

FURTHER verification that some kind of military aircraft was operating in
the area is scientifically irrefutable.

At 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by supersonic flight - was picked up by an
earthquake monitoring station in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles from
Shanksville.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30682 

"As soon as we looked up, we saw a mid-sized jet flying low and fast,"
Decker told the Record. "It appeared to make a loop or part of a circle, and
then it turned fast and headed out. " Describing the plane as a Lear-jet
type, with engines mounted near the tail and painted white with no
identifying markings, Decker said, "If you were here to see it, you'd have
no doubt. It was a jet plane, and it had to be flying real close when that
757 went down."


one eye witness in PA said there was a small white jet (nm) — anonymous, Sat Jul 24 01:09
commie f 104s in u.s. airspase — Anonymous, Sat Jul 24 02:48



Main Page - 07/24/04


Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]

APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES