blueridgeAn Open Letter II to WCPO regarding pulled ArticleMon Aug 23, 2004 22:2669.43.20.171Ms. Foreman,The nature of my questions were personal to you and your news station, andbeyond the scope of this insulting form letter, which is nothing but aredundant reply already posted on the web site. (Is it the stations policyto avoid making corrections in the news, or avoiding public inquiry, by aform letter that states nothing but generalities?) My questions are "in thepublic interest", and I request a specific reply to my specific questionsbelow, which are reasonable, and center on the FACTS in the originalstory....which have NOT been disproved, witnessed by the Mayor of Cleveland(who issued a statement which you quoted), and also your news station, andinformation from a United Airlines employee, who stated specifically that iswas UA Flight 93 that made an emergency landing on Sept. 11, 2001. I wouldlike an answer, as would thousands of Americans interested in your "newscoverage". Will you post a reply, a full and credible "correction"? ThereWAS an emergency landing, surely at least by United Airlines (unless the APor your station got that part wrong too), for a bomb threat, per theMayor....so which Flight number was it if not 93? Where did the flightoriginate from? How many passengers got off? IT IS STILL NEWS THAT HAS YETTO BE CORRECTED, IF IN ERROR AT ALL.If there is an error, standards procedure in media is to post a"correction". So if it was NOT Flight 93....then what plane landed inCleveland, with a reported bomb threat, to which the Mayor referred? Whotold you to take the web article down? Did someone in the government talkto your station about it? Whom? What did they say? When did the AP"disapprove" this "preliminary" supposed article of theirs (which I do notbelieve), and why did THEY fail to do so (assuming that is true) to yourstation, FOR ABOUT 3 YEARS? Yes...we are suspicious, which is reasonable!Why not post then the disclaimer from the AP about their article---and thedate they disclaimed it, if they did at all?!Do you believe in "freedom of the press"? Then please earn the public'strust, by coming forth with the truth...whether politically correct or not.Thousands are watching and waiting for a more credible reply from yourstation.Sincerely,BWS----- Original Message -----From: "Foreman, Elizabeth" To: "'blueridge'" Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:05 AMSubject: RE: WCPO AND TWO United Airlines PIECES solves 9/11 Puzzle Dear Sir/Madam, This is a form letter, as we've received several letters on this subject. Thanks for bringing this article to our attention. I believe a radio host found this story and put a link to it on his Web site: http://www.rense.com/general56/flfight.htm This article was a preliminary AP wire report. It was incorrect but forsome reason - probably due to the fact that September 11, 2001, was a hecticday - it wasn't removed from WCPO.com. We've consequently removed it to eliminate any confusion. Thanks again for visiting WCPO.com. Sincerely, LIZ Liz Foreman Internet Site Director WCPO.com eforeman@wcpo.com 513-852-4069 (office) 513-919-1112 (cell) -----Original Message----- From: blueridge [SMTP:blueridge@citynet.net] Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 10:10 PM To: eforeman@wcpo.com Cc: Jon Carlson Subject: WCPO AND TWO United Airlines PIECES solves 9/11 Puzzle Importance: High Ms. Foreman, WCPO webmaster, For almost 3 years your article, "PLANE LANDS IN CLEVELAND; BOMB FEARED ABOARD", dated 9/11/01 at 11:43:57 am, appeared on your web site. But within the last 10 days or so, SUDDENLY IT HAS MYSTERIOUS BEENDISAVOWED, AND REMOVED. (We have retained copies of the original article). This email is why the government had WCPO remove the article, which was NOT "factually incorrect", but only contradictory to the government's "official story" and coverup of the events of 9/11. This email is just one of many detailing with evidence the truth of what happened that day....vindicating your original story! Who made you change the posted web article, after almost 3 years? What did they tell you the reason was? Who did the order come from? Ibelieve you scooped the AP, in your original local coverage....I do not believeit was a "preliminary AP article", yet nevertheless, a REAL INCIDENT DID INDEED OCCUR AT CLEVELAND AIRPORT ON THAT DAY, WHICH THE MAYOR ISWITNESS OF, BY HIS OWN TESTIMONY, AND UNITED AIRLINES DID REPORT IT AS FLIGHT 93....YOUR ARTICLE WAS RIGHT. Due to the disinformation from the liars in our government about 9/11, flight 93 is supposedly the one that "crashed in Shanksville, PA".Below you will see how that was not the case....and your original ariticle is correct, and YOU KNOW can be verified by statements taken that day bythe above sources. (Only propaganda forces the issue that Flight 93 crashed...not factual data, not even a mortician). FOR THE SAKE OF THE TRUTH...PLEASE READ FURTHER...SEE HOW YOUR ARTICLE WASCORRECT....PROVING THE GOVERNMENT IS LYING ABOUT 9/11.....WHICH IS WHY THEY HAD YOU REMOVE THIS ARTICLE (being quote and posted) FROM YOUR SITE. For the good of America....help us expose this coverup of your story....WCPO had a real scoop on all the networks in the nation, by uncovering the truth,contrary to government propaganda! (An American Airlines chief informationofficer also appeared in recent articles talking of NEW cell phone technologyJUST NOW enabling communication between airlines and the ground....contraryto "Let's Roll"!) I hope to hear from you of the circumstances bringing about this change, and why you would have any reason to doubt the facts as originally reported, given that the event reported actually occurred with witnesses and mayor's testimony. Another explanation and identification of THAT aircraft must be provided before accepting that is was not Flight 93 ofUA as reported to WCPO. Sincerely,xxxxxxx
Main Page - Monday, 08/23/04
Message Board by American Patriot Friends Network [APFN]
APFN MESSAGEBOARD ARCHIVES