Ian McFerran
OPEN EMAIL - NICK BURG ''FAKED'' VIDEOS
Mon Aug 23, 2004 02:58
64.140.158.20

RE: BEHEADING OF NICK BERG ... cia.htm Western Voice on Tape http://www.apfn.org/Nickberg/voice.htm

The Unanswered Questions http://www.apfn.org/NickBerg/questions.htm

Nick Berg Had Ties To ...
HTTP://www.apfn.org/apfn/pow_beheaded.htm

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: OPEN EMAIL - NICK BURG ''FAKED'' VIDEOS
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 16:07:37 EDT
From: IanMcFerran@aol.com
To: apfn@apfn.org


This is a standard/open email, to anyone who's interested in truth and freedom, as I've been asked by some to list the anomalies I've noticed in these videos, so I thought I would put this email-list out on the web for ALL to see in the hope that honesty and truth will prevail and in line with my right to do so under Article 19 of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, 1948. Feel free to display the contents of this email on your website so that other open-minded people can consider the facts for themselves.

I am not an investigator or anything like that. I'm an alternative health therapist, just a regular man. However, I have a sharp(ish) mind and 20/20 vision and my eyes tell me a very different story to that which the ignorant masses are being lead to believe by the equally blind mass-media. I offer you these comments (and questions) below in friendship and in the hope that the ''oppressed'' minorities, will wake-the-hell-up and see what's going on right in front of their very own eyes. When reading this email, please keep in mind this quote by the German Rev. Martin Niemoller...

''First they came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me and, by that time, there was no-one left to speak up for me.''

Silence, according to the song, maybe golden, but it's also a potential KILLER!

Tell the world, SAVE THE WORLD.


NICK BURG VIDEO
1/ In the long version of Nick's beheading, which includes him giving a little speech about himself followed by his killers (laugh) giving their own speech afterwards, you see Nick is quite composed for someone who is about to be internationally humiliated and then horrifically killed in a non-Islamic fashion (note, according to some Islamic sites, the method used by these people is not normal Muslim practice).

2/ While the killers are reading their speech, Nick is, once again, as cool as a cucumber. Either he has been trained by ''007, James Bond'' or he knows nothing untoward is about to happen to him. He makes just the slightest movements during the entire ordeal. There is one other possibility which I will come to at the end of this email.

3/ The Muslim man (ha, ha) reading the speech, fumbles with the paper on which it is written many times but his voice never falters during the entire speech. Could someone else be reading the speech and he is just making out that it is him? I think so. In fact, at one point, he even losses where he is supposed to be reading from and gets the papers all mixed up and yet the voice continues perfectly. (Very profession, I DON'T think). It doesn't add any credibility to your ''cause'' if you show the world you can't even read!

4/ The Timer. This is a beauty! I'll leave you to have a good look at it but can someone out there in Internet-land, please get back to me and let me know why there are fluctuations on the counter at the bottom right of the screen throughout the entire speech/beheading footage? Also, I would like to know why it is, Internet-land population, that when Nick's head is cut off and lifted up to the camera in triumph (if you're mad enough to think that it was actually cut off) that the counter says THE SAME TIME it said when NIck's head was being cut off? Also, (I know I'm going on a bit but it's important) why is the counter in USA Military layout and not normal 12 or 24 hour settings used by the general public? Another issue; why is it that from the time the speech of the killers ends and the time we see Nick being pulled to the ground and attacked (we're lead to believe by the filming that this time-laps is about 1 second, at the most) is, according to the bottom right counter, almost an hour later?!!

5/ Nick, like all the others, makes no attempt to move out of the way during his execution. I realise his hands are bond but he is still in full control of his major muscles and can thrive around as most people would under the circumstances. I offer this, in the interest of fairness... could it be that military personnel are trained not to resist under such circumstances so the inevitable is over with much quicker? Quite possible. Could it also be that Nick is drugged? Quite possible. However, what we see is not Nick... it is a dummy, just like all the rest of the beheading executions! In fact, they used the same dummy for Nick as they did for Kim Sun Il.

6/ The camera cuts a number of times during the excision. Why? Surely these people want their cause furthered and, if we are to believe the Xenophobic American press, this would have been a golden opportunity for that to have occurred. Instead, they have an exceptionally poor quality tape-recording (just like the faked Oslama binLaden ''confession'' tape, created and put out by the Americans, in an attempt to allow America and it's allies to ''justify'' staying in Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, or whatever other country George W. Bush feels has ''his'' oil) when they could have made a crystal clear recording on digital. After all, these people are meant to have links to very rich organisation and, therefore, shit-loads of money at their disposal. Why didn't they use their wealth and purchase a brand new tape (even I can afford that) and record it with a good quality camera? (They can borrow mine if they want. It's old but it still works.) They haven't done their cause any justice at all. But then, they didn't make this film... did they?

7/ Why is the man reading from the speech speaking Arabic in a clearly Western accent?

8/ Why are the hands of ALL the terrorists... WHITE? I thought those who live in the Middle East are light brown in skin pigmentation? Maybe my eyes do need checking after all.

9/ I haven't seen this for myself, but people have commented on it... Apparently, some of the killers are wearing gold jewellery. You might thing that's OK. However, according to the strict rules of this (Muslim) group, Gold is forbidden. Worth having a think about that, wouldn't you say?

10/ Why is there a man wearing, what appears to be an American Military jacket & cap on the right side of the camera near the end of the footage? It's very nice of the killers, don't you think, to let their enemies have such a close look at one of their boys being killed? There can only be one reason for this man being there - Muslims DID NOT kill Nick Burg.

11/ Why is there a western man's voice, at the end of the killing, before his (the dummy's) head is raised up to the camera, saying IN ENGLISH - ''Thy Will Be Done, Thy Will Be Done.''? After this western/English slip-up (and, incidentally, Thy Will Be Done is an inherently ''Christian'' quote) the sound is suddenly switched off. As a budding amateur photographer, I can tell you here and now that these men will never get a job at the BBC or CNN as a cameraman!


KOREAN KIM SUN Il
Kim is an interesting one to watch, especially if you watch it after Nick's faked death. Kim does actually beg for his life and is blindfolded throughout. Personally, I think Kim Sun Il honestly believed he was about to die. My heart goes out to Kim's family especially. I cannot begin to imagine, nor do I wish to, what they must be going through right now. Obviously, the terrorists have learnt a lesson from the previous balls-up that was Nick's faked death. However, consider the following...

1/ When the killers are there, after Kim's begs & pleas have finished, Kim is uncharacteristically silent and motionless. Very odd, given that he was begging for his life moments before.

2/ His torso, attire, etc. are exactly the same as Nick Burg's, when he was, apparently, killed. (I suggest that they used the same dummy at this point).

3/ Just like Nick, when Kim's head is cut off, there is remarkably very little blood. Given that the killers have cut through several major arteries, this means, at least to me, that they did not cut the neck of a ''living'' man. I have seen footage and stills of beheadings in Saudi Arabia and I can tell you that when these arteries are cut, there is an enormous amount of blood that spurts out some 6-10 feet! If the person is stressed, as Kim clearly was, this would increase the blood pressure and, therefore, make one almighty mess. However, there is very little indeed. Given that both Nick and Kim are very close to a wall when they are beheaded, that wall should have been drenched in their blood. IT'S PERFECTLY CLEAN IN ALL OF THE SHOTS!!! Even highly qualified doctors have said this doesn't look right.


PAUL JOHNSON VIDEO
This is just a full blown joke! No speech, no long-winded pleas, just a dummy's head being cut off. As we say in England... "Please excuse my French... Bollocks!" I have nothing more to say about this film as it's an insult to my intelligence.

To Paul's family... I'm sorry if my comments are too strong for you. I realise you are going through a living hell right now and my heart truly bleeds for you. However, I must say the truth. You, along with the rest of the world, have been lied to. Your son/farther/husband, like so many before him and so many still to come, has been used for the sake of oil.


BULGARIAN GUN SHOT FOOTAGE
Hmm, this one looks like it could be real... but it isn't! It's fake like all the rest of these films that a 5 year old could do better at.

1/ He is utterly motionless (he's even better at it than Nick Burg was, and Nick was/is US-Millirary) during his killer's speech. How thoughtful of him to accommodate his murders like that.

2/ He then reads, on que (and I'll come back to the ''que'' later) a prepared speech.

3/ Camera cuts and suddenly, or is it just my eyes, now he has a blindfold and his mouth and the beard-area around his mouth take on a different characteristic.

4/ The man with the gun, shots the Bulgarian gentleman in the ''right temple''. Then what happens? Well...
a/ He raises his hands up in preparation for falling forward
b/ His head raises up in the same fashion
c/ Then (and this is the really funny bit) he falls FORWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think I'll just add a few more exclamation marks to make the point very clear here... He falls forward!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This defies the laws of physics. However, given that we are supposed to believe that the terrorists (who didn't exist) on September 11th 2001 suspended the laws of physics in the successful demolition of the Twin Towers and the missile (ops, should I have said plane, that's the official version, isn't it) that stuck the Pentagon, it's no wonder the makers of these faked films think we will believe Muslim can defy physics when shooting people as well.

Note: No blood leaves the entrance (right) side of the head. No blood leaves the exit (left) side of the head. He face is fully intact throughout - contrary to normal gunshot wounds to the head.

5/ Then the camera... yes, you've guessed it... ''cuts''.

6/ When they can be bothered to start filming again, there is no blood on the floor.

7/ Two more shots are fired into the gentleman's head. Again, no blood comes out at either time.

8/ The camera - AGAIN - cuts. Now we see a short scene from almost the front of the executed man. Arrr, finally, there's the blood. I knew it would be along sooner or later. Not much though, given he's had three bullets blasted into his head all at point-blank rang. And look! He's head and face are STILL in perfect condition. (Maybe they needed to use this dummy for another faked assassination film and didn't want to get it dirty.)


With regard to the ''que'': There is a possibility that ''Mind-Control'' is being used on these men and that all of the men are in fact dead through execution (which I doubt). If Mind-Control was used, not all people are as susceptible to it. Therefore, that may explain why Paul Johnson's film wasn't like the others. Perhaps he couldn't be Mind-Controlled and was just killed outright. With the Belgium gentleman, he may well have been controlled through this method. The subject of Mind-Control is vast and I would suggest you look into this further through some of the links I have listed below as I have taken the opportunity to list some websites, (along with the 1st site where all these films can be seen for free), where you can find out more about Mind-Control, Psychic work, Remote Viewing, Conspiracies, Corruption, etc, etc.

Above has been the main points of the footage that I've come up with so far. Don't get me wrong, whilst I have a sneaking suspicion that these men are linked into some sort conspiracy which they may or may not be complicit with, my heart goes out to their families who must be living through hell itself right now and, no doubt, will do for many years to come. I can do nothing for them except hope that these points, if made more public, go some way to showing the families that their sons/husbands/fathers have been used in one of the world's biggest and most horrific lies ever and hope that they seek justice through the proper channels.

The above then, for me, begs the following questions...

1/ Are these men involved, complicit or otherwise?
2/ If so, does the fact that these films are fakes mean that they are still alive?
3/ If so, are they now working for forces we know nothing about (perhaps they know nothing about what they are involved with either)?
4/ If they are dead, I do not believe that they are simply through the actions of these fake murders, then why were they used in such a public way?

I have one answer I would like to offer with respect to the last question - OIL! These actions by (apparently) terrorists have allowed America and it's allies to remain in the Middle East and 'secure' the countries and their energy resources. Likewise, America has gained in the Billions, just through contracts alone, to carry out what I have just said.

Any thoughts on these points would be greatly received and I say again, feel free to post these comments on your website.

This has been an open email, distributed to the sites below and others.

Yours in truth and friendship,

Ian.

http://www.turkishdenial.com/ (The site with the footage in question)

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/
http://www.rense.com/
http://islamonline.net/english/index.shtml
http://www.joshuabooks.com/index2.htm
http://www.spychips.com/index.html
http://trance-formation.com/default.htm
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.davidicke.com/
http://www.michaelmoore.com
http://ummo.cc/
http://www.newsforthesoul.com/index8.htm
http://www.the-movement.com/
http://www.guerrillanews.com/government/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/articlesrepublic.html
http://www.libertythink.com/911.htm
http://www.bushrevealed.com/
http://www.nwowatcher.com/

Three sites of interest...

http://www.pfc.org.uk/legal/hra98.htm
http://www.un.org