It's Coming Down
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/It's-Coming-Down.MP3
Domestic Use of Spy Satellites To Widen
Law Enforcement Getting New Access To Secret
Imagery
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 16, 2007; Page A01
The Bush administration has approved a plan to
expand domestic access to some of the most
powerful tools of 21st-century spycraft, giving
law enforcement officials and others the ability
to view data obtained from satellite and
aircraft sensors that can see through cloud
cover and even penetrate buildings and
underground bunkers.
A program approved by the Office of the Director
of National Intelligence and the Department of
Homeland Security will allow broader domestic
use of secret overhead imagery beginning as
early as this fall, with the expectation that
state and local law enforcement officials will
eventually be able to tap into technology once
largely restricted to foreign surveillance.
Administration officials say the program will
give domestic security and emergency
preparedness agencies new capabilities in
dealing with a range of threats, from illegal
immigration and terrorism to hurricanes and
forest fires. But the program, described
yesterday by the Wall Street Journal, quickly
provoked opposition from civil liberties
advocates, who said the government is crossing a
well-established line against the use of
military assets in domestic law enforcement.
Although the federal government has long
permitted the use of spy-satellite imagery for
certain scientific functions -- such as creating
topographic maps or monitoring volcanic activity
-- the administration's decision would provide
domestic authorities with unprecedented access
to high-resolution, real-time satellite photos.
They could also have access to much more. A
statement issued yesterday by the Department of
Homeland Security said that officials envision
"more robust access" not only to imagery but
also to "the collection, analysis and production
skills and capabilities of the intelligence
community."
The beneficiaries may include "federal, state,
local and tribal elements" involved in emergency
preparedness and response or "enforcement of
criminal and civil laws." The "tribal" reference
was to Native Americans who conduct
semiautonomous law enforcement operations on
reservations.
"These systems are already used to help us
respond to crises," Charles Allen, the chief
intelligence officer for the Department of
Homeland Security, said in a telephone
interview. "We anticipate that we can also use
it to protect Americans by preventing the entry
of dangerous people and goods into the country,
and by helping us examine critical
infrastructure for vulnerabilities."
Domestic security officials already have access
to commercial satellite imagery, including the
high-definition photographs available from
Google and other private vendors. But spy
satellites offer much greater resolution and
provide images in real time, said Jeffrey T.
Richelson, an expert on space-based surveillance
and a senior fellow with the National Security
Archive in Washington.
"You also can get more coverage more often,"
Richelson said. "These satellites will cover
during the course of their orbits the entire
United States. They will be operating 24 hours a
day and using infrared cameras at night."
Other nonvisual capabilities can be provided by
aircraft-based sensors, which include
ground-penetrating radar and highly sensitive
detectors that can sense electromagnetic
activity, radioactivity or traces of chemicals,
military experts said. Such radar can be used to
find objects hidden in buildings or bunkers.
One possible use of the technology would be to
spot staging areas along smuggling routes used
to transport narcotics or illegal immigrants,
officials said. In a handful of cases, security
officials have requested -- and obtained --
similar help, but only on a case-by-case basis.
Allen said the agreement with the DNI grew out
of the general impetus for wider
intelligence-sharing in the aftermath of the
Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, when
administration and intelligence officials began
examining the possibility of increasing
officials' access to secret data as a means of
strengthening the nation's defenses.
The program was formally authorized in May in a
memo by Director of National Intelligence Mike
McConnell to Homeland Security Secretary Michael
Chertoff. The two officials have been
coordinating for months, as recommended in a
2005 study headed by Keith Hall, then the
director of the National Reconnaissance Office.
Hall's group cited an "urgent need" for
expanding sharing of remote sensing data to
domestic groups other than scientific
researchers. "Opportunities to better protect
the nation are being missed," the report said.
Under the new program, the DHS will create a
subordinate agency to be known as the National
Applications Office. The new office, which has
gained the backing of congressional intelligence
and appropriations committees, is responsible
for coordinating requests for access to
intelligence by civilian agencies. Previously,
an agency known as the Civilian Applications
Committee facilitated access to satellite
imagery for geologic study.
Oversight of the department's use of the
overhead imagery data would come from officials
in the Department of Homeland Security and from
the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence and would consist of reviews by
agency inspectors general, lawyers and privacy
officers. "We can give total assurance" that
Americans' civil liberties will be protected,
Allen said. "Americans shouldn't have any
concerns about it."
But civil liberties groups quickly condemned the
move, which Kate Martin, director of the Center
for National Security Studies, a nonprofit
activist group, likened to "Big Brother in the
sky." "They want to turn these enormous spy
capabilities, built to be used against overseas
enemies, onto Americans," Martin said. "They are
laying the bricks one at a time for a police
state."
Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on
Government Secrecy for the Federation of
American Scientists, said that the data could be
useful but that oversight for the program was
woefully inadequate. Enhanced access "shouldn't
be adopted at all costs because it comes with
risk to privacy and to the integrity of our
political institutions," he said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/15/AR2007081502430.html?nav=rss_politics
======================
I'm The Resister
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/I'm-The-Resister.MP3