RE:
http://www.rense.com/general73/red.htm
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Israelis Caught Red Handed Planning 'Arab'
Terrorism
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 08:28:30 -0500
From: Oceania Investigations
pat.shannan@gmail.com
To: Janice@911truth.org
My brother rushed in to turn on the TV when he heard that this
story
was breaking and hailed me into the room. My immediate reaction
was
that this was either total propaganda that didn't happen at all
or
another "false flag" operation promoted by the greatest
deceivers on
earth; the same who appear to exposing their motives in this
phone
call.
Somebody needs to press Rense for more proof of the veracity of
this.
Is there a tape? No one should need reminding that tomorrow is
the
14th, but if nothing comes down, this exposure will be accepted
by
many as the reason why it didn't.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
towncryr@comcast.net
Date: Aug 12, 2006 9:38 PM
Subject: Israelis Caught Red Handed Planning 'Arab' Terrorism
To: towncryr@comcast.net
It certainly has the 'air' of legitimacy.. Of course, this isn't
the
kind of information where one puts his or her by-line.
Interesting
that it states there are "lots more" and that there will be
another
one on the 14th...
If this is, in fact, legitimate, it gives several extremely
interesting references to different institutions, people and
agencies...
Israelis Caught Red Handed Planning 'Arab' Terrorism
The Voice of the White House
8-12-6
WASHINGTON, DC -- "Here, as promised, is an interesting
conversation
that somehow accidentally got intercepted and transcribed. There
are
lots more where this came from!"
Transcription of telephone conversation on August 3, 2006
from
Israeli Embassy, Washington D.C. Telephone Number (202)
364-5582.
to
unidentified individual at AIPAC , Washington D.C., Telephone
Number
(202) 639-5201
Commenced 1821 hrs, concluded 1826 hrs.
Speaker A: Reuven Azar - Counselor for Political Affairs,
Embassy of Israel
Speaker B: Unidentified individual located at AIPAC headquarters
A. Well, things are going as well as expected, better perhaps
than
expected. There is military progress there (Lebanon) and we have
wonderful cooperation here.
B. For sure, but don't forget the dangers in having too much
cooperation. All right for this moment but in the long run, this
can
certainly backfire on us. You know, we are seen as being too
much
influential with the Bush people.
A. I wouldn't worry too much about that. The media is certainly
not to
worry about and most Americans really do not care about things
there
(Lebanon) The main point is that by the time the U.S. makes
itself
felt at the UN, we will have accomplished our goals and
established
the buffer we need.
B. Absolutely butthere is still the future to think about.
A. Who cares? Once we establish the buffer, the rest is just
shit. It
will all be hidden soon in the coming press reports of Arab
'attacks'
on the U.S. This is for the voting in November. You know, 'many
Arab
groups will for sure attack American targets.' They (the U.S.
Government) will choose so-called target areas where they need
the
most support. We don't need to worry about Miami, Skokie or
Beverly
Hills after all. (Laughter) and this is a little crude but the
public
here is terribly stupid and the warning color days worked
before,
didn't they?
B. Yes, but there are second thoughts on all of that. If you go
to the
well too often, there are problems. People lose interest.
A. The British are being such swine about this, aren't they?
They are
causing trouble about the bombs these days.
B. Just a few troublemakers. The press here does not cover that
and
who reads the foreign media? Most Americans can't read anyway.
But
there is danger that the U.N. might be motivated to move a peace
keeping force into Lebanon and this might negate our purposes.
Hesbollah must be utterly wiped out and Syria must be made to
realizewith force if necessarythat it cannot supply the
terrorists
with more Iranian rockets. Maybe an accidental airstrike on
Syrian
military units could say to them to mind their own business. We
have
done this before.
A. It is too bad that we cannot teach Tehran a lesson. The
ultimate
goal would be to have America attack Iran but I am afraid the
American
military is dead set against this
B. They are all Jew-haters up there.
A. For sure, but we know that Americans can bomb the shit out of
Tehran and hopefully kill off a number of the militants,
probably
disrupt their atomic program and teach all of the area that the
U.S.
means business. We support them, they support us. But they
cannot send
in ground troops and if we did that, our losses would not be
borne at
home. As it is, there are the usual malcontents bleating about
the
Lebanon business.
B. They are just afraid they will get a rocket on their house
and
there are the same ones here. The Lieberman business is not that
good,
after all. Yes, of course he is a liberal Democrat but his
support of
us is too obvious. He could be a little critical too. We see the
Bush
people doing this, just to keep the people quiet. Yes, they say,
see,
we too are actually critical of Israel.
A. But not too critical, right?
B. No, never that. Too many pictures of dead jerks for example.
We
need to see more pictures of grieving Israelis, mourning lost
sons and
children. Can't we get more of those? ... the Arabs.
A. I feel sorry for the American media. Their instincts are to
defend
dead Arab children
B. But nits make lice, don't they? Who mourns dead Israeli
children?
A. I'm sure there would be more on this but not enough children
are dead.
B. Not yet, anyway. But if they rocket Tel Aviv
A. Well, then, for sure.
B. We should have pictures all ready if that happens. Do you
think it will?
A. Tehran directs that part of the business. We don't have as
much
inside gen on them there
B. The ...ing Russians are on their side.
A. We have always had trouble with those Slavic pricks. First
weapons
B. The Chinese assholes also do this, don't forget.
A. No one around here will forget that, be assured. The time
will come
when we get them too. Say we cut off their oil from the Gulf?
What
then? They will dance to our tunes then, not Tehran's.
B. If we had oil
A. But we do not. The filthy Putin has the oil. They should get
rid of
him while they are at it. Our people almost had it but he forced
them
out.
B. They can always come back. The people here would really
support
this. We put our people back in after we get rid of Putin and
then a
guaranteed flow of oil to America.
A. And Russia is off the chessboard too.
B. They all want that badly here, too. Cheney is the strongest
supporter of cutting the nuts off of RussiA. The military
here are against fishing in troubled waters.
A. They can't be replaced, Bush can't sack them all.
B. Set an example. Sack a few more of the assholes and the rest
will
shut up. They always do. So, send me your latest list and I'll
see
what I can do here.
A. Send someone to pick it up. The mail here is awful. It will
take a
week if some black doesn't steal it, throw it away or wipe his
ass with it.
B. Tomorrow for sure.
A. OK. And one other matter. We feel very strongly that if the
current people get kicked out in November, as it looks like they
might, we owe them to help them stay right where they are. It
has
taken a long time and much money to get all the ducks lined up
and we
don't want to have to start in again. We can generally rely on
sympathy from the Democrats but they will not support any more
military ventures over there. That's for sure.
B. Then what do you suggest?
A. The terrorism card works wonders. We were going to release a
statement that Arabs were going to attack an El Al plane on
takeoff,
with rockets.
A. Probably leftovers from the CIA businesses in Afghanistan.
A. Let's not get into that now. But this scare would only affect
flights to Israel and we don't think it would have any impact on
the
election.
B. Well then, why not have these attacks aimed at American
aircraft?
Where would they attack from?
A. Say at the perimeter fence lines at airports. Or better
still, why
not a plan cooked up to smuggle explosives on board
transatlantic
flights to or from America? Something clever that will catch the
public imagination.
B. That stupid bomb in the shoe routine?
A. Don't knock it. It worked, didn't it? We can always find some
suckers with a bent to this we can fill up with real enthusiasm
and
then turn them in, complete with plans. They actually believe
they are
going to paradise and ... virgins and we have another propaganda
coup. Let's give this some effort. You know, a terrified public
will
not want to change horses in mid stream. So far, the Rove people
have
a good line: If you're against the Republicans, you're
encouraging the
evil terrorists sthick.
B. Well, they did that with the alert warnings and it workedmore
or less.
A. Face it, they aren't too bright here. They ran it into the
ground,
had to fire Ridge and Ashcroft, one of our very best friends
ever, and
put those things on ice. They need to discover a huge plot but
in
America
A. You know, as you said, infiltrate a group of crazies, plant
things
on them, call the FBI
B. Oh, they do that themselves. That business in Florida was
pathetic
A. But it worked, didn't it?
B. For about ten minutes at six o'clock for about three days.
A. Well, think about it and get back to me.
B. Right.
A. What's the situation with your two people? Are they going to
be
tried or not?
B. Probably not, as far as the Bush people are concerned. But it
is up
to the courts and we are very careful not to ... with them. They
are expected to have the charges thrown out soon
A. Well, I'll pray for them. I have to go now so I'll get back
to you
later. Don't forget to send someone for the list
B. OK.
(Conversation terminated)
This is just the tip of a very large iceberg. Other inside
information
will be published in upcoming editions. On Monday, August 14, I
will
put up a complete listing of all members of Congress who have
received
money from AIPAC, state by state, amount by amount.
Dear old crazy, and defeated, Lieberman, shrieking with rage at
seeing
all his extra income flowing down the drain, has received over
$227,758 so far from AIPAC . Tell me, children, what did he do
for all
that money? There are many more names and amounts to entertain
you as
well as to give you a concrete guide as to your voting in
November
next.
As far as the recent stories about "terrorist attacks" coming
from
England, don't believe them. It is well known around the White
House
that this invented story is designed to offset the crushing
defeat of
the Administration's darling liberal, Lieberman. This theme, by
the
way, according to position papers circulating here, is the main
theme
of the November elections. The thesis? Why the Iron Trio of
Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld have protected, and will continue to
protect,
innocent America from evil terrorist threats.
Of course, if you vote Democratic, all bets are off and armies
of
rabid Muslim (read non Christian) fascists will at once invade
America, to rape, loot and pillage while setting off bombs in
the
Des Moines Public Library. Please note that in spite of all the
shit
the Bush people have spread around about "proctecting America"
there
has not been one proven incident of any real terrorist group
caught or
no attack thwarted. The WMD lies were the father and the
"terrorist
threats" and the illegitimate child of this corrupt and
dangerous
gang."
<http://www.rense.com/general73/red.htm>
http://www.rense.com/general73/red.htm
